 |
 |
OK, what's going on? First a post from Victor Lounds, and then one from Lee Duynslager labelled as "possible spam" (see copied header below), and I suspect this is just the beginning. Did we change something to the campus spam filter to create a bunch of false positves, or do we just have a rash of users coincidentaly sending messages that look like spam? Thanks, -- dkm At 12/22/2008 01:59 PM Monday, Lee Duynslager wrote: >X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system >"mx56.mail.msu.edu", has > identified this incoming email as possible spam. The > original message > has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't > spam) or label > similar future email. If you have any questions, see > [log in to unmask] for details. > Content preview: I've already called the helpdesk about > this. Does anybody > know the maximum attachment size for the new MSU webmail? > From what the attachment > upload screen shows it is 2mb. Is that a mistake, because > before our users > could send 10mb of attachments right? [...] > Content analysis details: (-1.0 points, 5.0 required) > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at > http://www.dnswl.org/, low > trust > [35.8.2.205 listed in list.dnswl.org] > 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message