I’m not clear what the negatives
are for Exchange. It scales well, has great support from both Microsoft
and a host of other companies, it has the best web client that I am aware of,
supports more current mobile devices and can be expected to support any
significant future devices capable of email and calendaring. Sure it
costs money but so do most good systems. My sense is that you tend to get
what you pay for in both cars and software.
From: Jon Galbreath
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007
10:13 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG]
University-wide messaging and calendar system
Zimbra’s a
pretty good alternative to Exchange for a collaboration suite. My only
thought on it is: what’s going to happen to it now that it’s been
purchased by Yahoo?
From: MSU Network
Administrators Group [mailto:
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007
9:46 AM
To:
Subject: [MSUNAG] University-wide messaging
and calendar system
I enjoyed attending the MSU IT Exchange last Friday to
discuss the technology direction and concerns for the University as well as to
share ideas on what might be the best solutions.
In particular the topic Mr Davis discussed on the current University email
system and the possible directions that could be taken with it ("stay the
course", replace, upgrade, discontinue, etc) and the thoughts and feelings
of the audience. I can see their are some passionate individuals about this
topic.
While I feel the mail system could be better with updates, like a refreshed web
interface, I feel there is a much greater need for a University-wide calendar
system. I seem to remember Mr Gift commenting on how this topic can be
very sensitive with individuals and that one of the biggest challenges with it
is personal control to who can access your calendar and what they can see or
do.
Personally I've been looking into the Zimbra Collaboration Suite (http://www.zimbra.com/products/)
which seems to provide a fully featured messaging, calendaring, contact
management package. The system can be run in a hosted enviroment or
purchased and run at the University level on our own servers.
For those unfamiliar with Zimbra, it provides messaging using all of the
standard protocols (POP3, IMAP and SMTP with or without SSL) so stand-alone
programs like Microsoft Outlook, Mozilla Thunderbird, Eudora or Apple Mail.app
would work with it. In addition a fancy
Zimbra also provides a calendar to each user and allows the user to control
access to it from other users. With permissions set users can even
"subscribe" to anothers calendar using the iCal standard protocol
with programs like Apple's iCal or Mozilla Sunbird (Windows, Linux, Mac) and
Microsoft Outlook 2007 or 2003 with a plug-in.
One advantage I see with this system is that users of Outlook can still
maintain their calendar, contacts and mail through Outlook, like they do now,
and all of that will be syncronized with the Zimbra server. It even
supports Outlook in cached mode. Those of us with Macs can use Mail.app,
iCal and Address book and this will sync (using iSync) to the server as well.
There are a number of other features that I haven't looked at yet, such as
instant messaging, creating documents and custom components for VOIP or
mapping.
I see on their web site that they are having some webinars about campus wide
messaging using Zimbra, and comparing it to what Google is offering (http://www.zimbra.com/about/webinars.html).
I'm curious, has anyone at the "University level" looked at Zimbra as
a possible replacement for the current messaging system? Is anyone on
campus running Zimbra? If so, what has been your experience with it?
Just my thoughts to try and get a discussion started on this topic.
--
Informatics Specialist
Biomedical
100 Conrad Hall
Phone: 517-432-4248
Fax: 517-353-9420
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
__________ NOD32 2591 (20071014) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com