 |
 |
Yes, but many of us remember centralization ;=) -----Original Message----- From: Tony Cooke [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 1:08 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] University-wide messaging and calendar system >>Olson: "The problem would be how to implement Exchange." Agreed. At the IT Exchange (aptly named), when Tom Davis queried the group about "Campus Exchange", I asked if we were just talking about Exchange, or rather Exchange plus AD as a whole. Consider that there are _many_ AD domains on campus (several of which AIS maintains), and many units not running AD run some other form of NOS (such as Novell). I imagine (and this would be an excellent case study) that the University as a whole wastes a significant amount of resources duplicating the effort supporting NOS\infrastructure (labor, hardware, licensing, support.) Further, since we're already scarce on resources (read: man hours) a more centralized IT approach at MSU would allow people to focus on the mission of their department, and put less focus on being a jack-of-all-trades (master of none). Honestly, I think the impact of decentralization should be heavily considered in these financially difficult times. >>Surato: "The biggest negative I can see is that it is a Microsoft platform. It does scale, but it is also less secure (in my opinion)." I don't think that it being a MS platform is a negative, nor does that make it less secure. This is often the case when the administrator of said Windows system lacks the tools\training required to maintain it properly. >>Murray: ".their applications product support for non-Windows systems, in my experience, hasn't be great but rather poor." A lot of different systems could potentially be impacted by even the thought of "Campus AD". However, I think that understanding and mitigating these types of problems would be a significant part of the research phase. >>Zimbra: I think Zimbra is novel (no Groupwise related pun intended), but really it feels like an OSS knock-off of Exchange to me. Plus, to get all of the features, you'd need to get the "Enterprise" (or similar) version, at which point I'm not certain that the cost savings (per CAL) would be great over Exchange. I will, however, say that Zimbra's web UI is very slick. -Tony __________ NOD32 2591 (20071014) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com