Print

Print


We use Acronis TrueImage for a few servers and it works awesome.  I know
it is a bit more expensive but it seems to be worth it.  Being able to
restore a server to completely different hardware with ease is a great
thing, not to mention you can use that feature to transfer physical -->
Virtual and Virtual ---> physical.

Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator

[log in to unmask]
517-355-9200 x2569


-----Original Message-----
From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Troy Murray
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 9:04 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Bare metal restore software

I've used the Home version before on a few Windows 2003 servers.  It  
wouldn't see any disks that weren't basic disks.  I also looked at  
their enterprise version that will backup your servers and have a  
central console to control it all.  I found the centralized console to  
be half baked (this was last February) and their Universal Restore  
option (at that time) was an additional purchase.

I don't know the cost, or if you use Backup Exec, but they have a  
version that does server (and desktop) imaging, not sure if its a  
separate product (was when I considered it) or an option for Backup  
Exec now.

--
Troy Murray

On Sep 5, 2007, at 4:24 PM, Laurence Bates <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> As far as I can see, the folk at Acronis are very intransigent about  
> the
> price of their software.  I havn't found any deals on the web and  
> they want
> $553 per server (Quantity 25) for educational institutions.  That's  
> the
> price of a fairly decent car.  I just can't see paying that much for  
> disk
> imaging software.
>
> For what it's worth, they do a Home version that works with Windows  
> 2003 but
> they do not recommend it for that purpose.  I think that it might  
> work for
> simple servers but it cannot see more complex drive setups.
>
> So I guess that I'm still looking, which is a pity.  Acronis could  
> make so
> much more if they charged a reasonable price per copy.  That certainly
> worked for Microsoft...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter J Murray [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 11:08 AM
> To: Laurence Bates
> Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Bare metal restore software
>
> He got us a really good rate on NOD32, so I'm sure he might be able to
> work out something with Acronis.
>
> Laurence Bates wrote:
>> Thanks.  I might try that.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Peter J Murray [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 10:02 AM
>> To: Laurence Bates
>> Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Bare metal restore software
>>
>> I like Acronis too.  Perhaps an email to Ron Rivard asking him to  
>> look
>> into negotiating a special rate for MSU.
>>
>> Laurence Bates wrote:
>>
>>> I am looking into disk imaging software (again) and finding that the
>>> prices for software that will do live image backup for Windows  
>>> server
>>> 2003 are still too high.  I like Acronis True Image Server for  
>>> Windows
>>> 9.1 for its convenience but the best price that I have seen it at is
>>> $629.  What are other people using?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Laurence A. Bates
>>>
>>> College of Education
>>>
>>> Michigan State University
>>>
>>> 217E Erickson Hall
>>>
>>> East Lansing
>>>
>>> MI 48824
>>>
>>> 517-355-2178
>>>
>>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________ NOD32 2507 (20070905) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 2507 (20070905) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com