 |
 |
Only issue we've seen here is, again, the MMC snapin. I've created a few utilities for advanced users that, I've had to recreate on their machines because the MMC with SP2 is newer than what comes in the AdminPak. -dak On 7/9/07 10:55 AM, "Troy Murray" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Just wanted to see if the general consensus on applying and running > Windows Server 2003 SP2 was still positive or if anyone has run across > a snag. > > Thanks, > > -t > > > > On 4/13/07, Erik Selke <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> All 4 of my 2k3 servers are running it w/o issue. >> >> Erik >> >> Peter J Murray wrote: >>> On a related matter, anyone had any experiences with SP2 for Windows >>> Server 2003? >>> >>> Laurence Bates wrote: >>>> >>>> What is the general consensus about the best way of installing >>>> Microsoft's regular update Patches? >>>> >>>> 1) Automatically install when available >>>> >>>> 2) Automatically download and install ASAP >>>> >>>> 3) Automatic download and install after a reasonable comment period. >>>> >>>> 4) Do extensive testing before installing regular updates >>>> >>>> 5) Install first on a virtual LAN which mimics all of the major >>>> servers ;-) >>>> >>>> Laurence A. Bates >>>> >>>> College of Education >>>> >>>> Michigan State University >>>> >>>> 217E Erickson Hall >>>> >>>> East Lansing >>>> >>>> MI 48824 >>>> >>>> 517-355-2178 >>>> >>>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Erik Selke >> Information Technologist >> Department of Sociology >> 316 Berkey Hall >> Michigan State University >> [log in to unmask] >> (517) 353-1804 >> >