02
Aug 2006
When Elena Ortiz found a job on an organic
raspberry farm after working for nine years in conventionally farmed fields,
she was glad for the change. The best part about her new job was that she no
longer had to work just feet away from tractors spraying chemical herbicides
and pesticides. An added bonus was the fruit itself -- "prettier,"
she said, and firmer, which made it easier to pick.
Better living without chemicals?
Photos: iStockphoto
But when it came to how Ortiz was treated by
her employers, little was different. Her pay remained meager: $500 a week at
peak berry-picking season, but as little as $200 a week during much of the
year, leaving her and her farmworker husband with little money to buy fruits
and vegetables for their five children. The supervisors at her farm, Reiter
Berry, were often "aggressive" and capricious. Rules were arbitrary;
workers were sometimes closely monitored, but sometimes allowed to work
independently. They were, said Ortiz, assigned to "better or worse
rows" -- all depending on the whims of the supervisors.
When organizers from the United Farm Workers encouraged the Reiter employees to
form a union, the company allegedly responded with intimidation and harassment.
"There was an atmosphere of fear. People were afraid they would be laid
off," Ortiz said in a recent interview. (Elena Ortiz is not her real name;
fearful of losing her job, she spoke only on condition of anonymity.) "I
wish they would treat us better. What can the people do? Nothing."
Garland Reiter, one of the co-owners of the company, took objection to Ortiz's
comments. "I think we're a leader in the industry, living by honesty,
openness, and respect," he said.
Nevertheless, it appears that worker abuse in the organic industry is
widespread.
"There's a common conventional wisdom by a lot of consumers, especially at
the higher-end stores, that just because it's organic the workers are treated
better," said UFW spokesperson Mark Grossman. "And that's simply not
true."
That disconnect between reality and public perception is of increasing concern
to farmworker advocates, food activists, and some farmers, who worry that as
the organic sector replicates the abusive conditions of conventional
agriculture, it is sacrificing the founding values of the sustainable-food
movement. The desire to return organic to its roots is driving a slew of
initiatives to develop labor standards for organic farms. If successful, the
new standards would establish the organic sector as the kind of fully
sustainable industry -- both socially responsible and environmentally sound --
that could be a model for the entire economy.
Green and red and unfair all over.
When you go to the supermarket and buy produce
or packaged goods that carry the organic label, you can feel confident that the
food was grown under rigorous environmental standards. The U.S. Department of
Agriculture's organic seal, which debuted in 2002, is
a guarantee that your fruits and vegetables were cultivated without
petroleum-based fertilizers or (with rare exceptions) synthetic chemicals, and
that they aren't genetically modified. The organic label, however, goes only so
far. While the seal covers a range of environmental practices, it says nothing
about labor conditions.
Although comprehensive studies of conditions on organic farms are hard to find,
complaints like Ortiz's are not uncommon. For example, Willamette River
Organics, one of
Workers get no consolation in the form of higher wages or better benefits,
either. According to a report
published last year by researchers at UC-Davis, a majority of 188
If that doesn't seem to fit the organic movement's hippie and homesteader origins,
the incursion of big business may be partly to blame. Reiter Affiliated
Companies, where Ortiz works, is a perfect example of how the movement has
shifted. With thousands of employees, Reiter is the biggest supplier to
Driscoll
That niche is now a $14 billion industry in the U.S. Giant food-processing
corporations, seeing opportunities for expansion, have become major players in
the organic industry. For example, General Mills owns the organic brands
Cascadian Farm and Muir Glen. Kellogg owns Sunrise Organic. Even agribusiness
giant ConAgra is in on the act, recently introducing organic versions of its
Orville Redenbacher popcorn and Hunt's tomato sauce brands.
And while organic's profitability would suggest that there is plenty of money
to pay workers better -- for those so inclined -- much of the profits go to
retailers and wholesalers higher up the food chain. Raising workers' wages is
also complicated by the fact that organic labor costs are disproportionately
high, since such operations often depend on hand weeding in place of chemical
herbicides.
Ultimately, paying workers more depends on paying farmers more, which appears
unlikely in a country that has gotten used to cheap food.
"People look down on farmers," said Tim Vos, one of the co-owners of
People who feed people.
Another obstacle toward improving conditions
is that, simply put, the treatment of farm laborers doesn't rate high on most
people's list of concerns. At least, that's the conclusion of a recent consumer study conducted by
researcher Phil Howard at UC-Santa Cruz. The survey found that workers' rights
ranked fifth on a list of food-related issues that interested respondents --
right behind the treatment of animals.
Farmer Jim Cochran put it bluntly: "Everybody cares about how the bugs are
treated, but nobody cares about how the workers are treated."
Cochran knows what he's talking about. In 1987, his operation, Swanton Berry
Farm, became the first organically certified strawberry grower in
The 30 workers at Swanton
While Cochran's commitment to social justice is laudable, being a union farm
makes his costs 15 percent higher than those of other organic growers. Because
union certification seems unrealistic for the small and medium-sized farms that
still make up the bulk of organic growers, a range of organizations is working
on proposals to create some kind of "fair made" label to encourage
farmers to adopt better labor policies.
At least half a dozen projects are in the works. The Rural Advancement
Foundation International and the Farmworker Support Committee have enlisted
five farms in a pilot project
demonstrating best labor practices. Growers in
The slew of different programs demonstrates an energetic grassroots commitment
to improving worker treatment. But there is a danger that having too many
separate standards will be confusing to consumers and cumbersome for growers.
So the various interests have come together in an ad-hoc coalition -- the
Domestic Fair Trade Working Group -- to develop a single set of labor
standards, a single monitoring process for farms, and one seal that consumers
can trust to mean workers were treated right. The draft principles include a
living wage for farmworkers, fair prices for farmers, transparent business
practices, and family farm ownership.
Of course, another alternative would be to try to amend the existing USDA
organic seal to include labor standards. But with advocates already busy
fighting back efforts by the major food processors to loosen the organic rules,
creating an independent label appears the best way to go.
"The government can't lead on this," said Cecil Wright, director of
local operations at
When will that point be? Participants in the coalition agree it will be at
least three years before shoppers can expect to see an independent label that
certifies decent working conditions. In the meantime, advocates point out that
there are a number of steps farmers can take to make their employees feel more
valued. A recent report
[PDF] by the California Institute for Rural Studies looked at best labor
practices on 12 organic farms and identified several low-cost ways for
cash-strapped farmers to improve workplace conditions. When interviewed,
farmworkers said a slower pace of work, year-round employment, free food from
the farm, flexible schedules, and plain old "respectful treatment"
would make them feel like their work was important.
The stakes are high when it comes to the successful creation of a "fair
labor" organic seal, and the importance of the struggle goes beyond the
tight-knit sustainable-food community. If organic farmers can find a way to
produce food without exploiting either the environment or their workers,
advocates say, they can set an example for other industries to follow.
"For me, the big issue is in terms of progressive movement-building,"
said Ronnie Cummins, director of the Organic Consumers Association. "It's
time to dovetail the health, sustainability, and justice movements. The
potential is incredible. But it's going to take some real, hard
organizing."
- - -
- - - - - - -
Jason Mark lives and works on an organic
farm in California, where he is researching a book about the future of food.
He is the coauthor, with Kevin Danaher, of Insurrection:
Citizen Challenges to Corporate Power.
|
http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2006/08/02/mark/index.html
Grist Magazine:
Environmental News and Commentary
©2006. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of
humor®.
9.
USDA report disputes claim that farmers are vanishing breed
Farm Press online news
Aug 4, 2006 8:56 AM
By Paul Hollis
Farm Press Editorial
Staff
http://southeastfarmpress.com/news/080406-usda-exits/
The
HOLLIS
|
One example of our government’s clever
use of the language is the recent USDA report, “Understanding U.S. Farm
Exits,” a much more palatable title than perhaps, “The Disappearing
U.S. Farmer,” or “U.S. Farmers: A Vanishing Breed.”
The report explains that the rate at which
According to the report, about 717,100 farms
in the
Understanding farm exits is important for
three reasons, says the report. First, knowing which types of farms are most likely
to exit might be useful to policymakers interested in the effects of exits on
exiting farmers, the remaining farms, and farm communities. Second, exits help
reallocate resources between farming and other economic activities and within
the farm sector itself. Third, farm exits — and farm entries — play
an important role in introducing technologies and productivity growth, as in
other industries.
The authors of the USDA report studied two
fundamental drivers of farm exits — farm size and operator age. The life
cycle of farm operators is important in understanding farm exits because most
• Exit rates decline as farm size
(measured by sales) increases.
• Nevertheless, exit rates are still 6
to 7 percent for large farms (sales of $250,000 or more).
• The exit rate initially declines with
age until it reaches 8 to 9 percent for farmers between 45 and 54 years of age.
• The rate then increases and peaks at
12 to 13 percent for farmers who are at least 65 years old.
• Exit probability is inversely related
to business age. It is substantially higher for recent entries than for older,
more established farms.
• Exit probability is particularly low
for large farms that are at least 14 years old and operated by farmers who are
younger than 65. The lower exit probability for these large, well-established
farms may help explain the growing concentration of production among fewer
farms, particularly if the farms are passed on to other family members and
continue in operation.
With farm bill politics in season,
you’ll likely be hearing a great deal more in coming months about the
decreasing numbers of U.S. farmers, including the rationalization that new
technologies, etc., mean that none of us should be alarmed that farmer numbers
continue to decline over time.
Anyone who has observed agriculture in recent
years has noticed several trends, including fewer and fewer young people
entering the farming profession, the increasing average age of farmers, and the
decimation of rural communities due to declining farm-based economies. The USDA
report touches on some of these trends, but the research methodology and
statistics tend to obfuscate the human element.
10. Vegetable
By John Mishanec, IPM Vegetable Program
General Conditions
While counties in central part of eastern NY continue to receive at
least 2 heavy rains per week, the area from
Vine Crops
Go out and check your pumpkin fields for powdery mildew (PM).
Look on the undersides of leaves for the telling white spots of powder.
Once you find your first PM this kicks off your spray schedule. Meg
McGrath recommends mobile fungicides such as Quintec, Nova or Procure,
and Pristine rotated with protectant fungicides like bravo, etc. It
is important to monitor mildew development on the underside of leaves to assess
fungicide effectiveness. Fungicide resistance is a major concern with
this disease.
Downy mildew was found in western NY and on
Sweet Corn
Trap catches in eastern NY, NJ are increasing in European corn borer
(ECB) and corn ear worm (CEW) We are catching consistent numbers or CEW
in the neighborhood of 1.5 to 2 per night which indicates a 4-5 day spray
schedule. ECB numbers are increasing and basically at this point in the
season growers have few options but to protect their corn in green silk.
For now, it is important to spray corn with emerging tassels if the field is
over a 15% threshold of worm infestation. To make a decision on spraying
the rest of your corn, it is important to follow the trap catches in your
location. CEW are the most dangerous. CEW lay their eggs on
the silk and when the eggs hatch the larvae will go directly into the tip of
the ear. CEW eggs hatch with 76 degree days (DD). With a 70 degree
temperature average, you will accumulate around 20 DD per day. Our higher
temperatures in the 90's will really push this and you can expect eggs to hatch
in 3 days or less. ECB eggs hatch with 100 DD so it takes a little longer
for ECB to hatch. ECB lay their eggs in the ear zone either on the ear or
on the undersides of leaves around the ear. When the ECB larvae hatch,
they are small and it takes a while for them to be big enough to get into the
ear. You have some space with ECB but not with CEW. The CEW
levels drive your spray schedule. With the levels of CEW we are catching,
a 4-5 day schedule on silk corn is called for.
Many growers report that Warrior has not been doing the job it once did.
Try different products if this has been the case on your farm. For
organic growers, Entrust will work fairly well against CEW when the numbers are
low. If insect populations skyrocket, than even hard chemicals have a
hard time doing the job.
Peppers
In some fields we have found bacterial spot on pepper. The
lower leaves have numerous quarter inch and smaller size spots. The lower
leaves Then turn yellow and begin to fall off. Fixed copper plus Maneb is
the recommendation for conventional growers and copper alone for organic
growers.
The second flight of European corn borer (ECB) is just beginning. ECB
will lay their eggs on peppers and when the larvae hatch, they will make a hole
just at the edge of the cap. Water gets into the hole and then the fruit
rots. Spintor of for organic growers, Entrust will work very well
in controlling the ECB larvae on a 5-7 day schedule.
Tomatoes
Growers should be carefully monitoring their crops looking for late
blight. Look for large, the size of a half dollar black spots on the
leaves. Early in the day, you will see a white ring of spores around the
spot. There is nothing else that looks like late blight so if you see it
you will know. Call your local Cooperative extension office or call me at
518-434-0016 if you think you have late blight.
Be careful mixing copper with other fungicides as sometimes you will get
burning on the new growth. It may appear you have a disease problem but if
it is only on the new growth, than you probably have a burn issue.
We are also finding lots of early blight on lower leaves. Look for bronze
colored spots with concentric rings in them. Sometimes the spots are at
the edge of the leaf and sometimes they appear as small, quarter inch size
spots on the leaf. Early blight is not an aggressive disease. It
comes on when the plant is stressed and in a weakened condition. This can
be environmental or just from a heavy fruit load. Now with fruit sizing
up, it is putting stress on the plant and along with moist conditions, we are
seeing this problem in most fields. The traditional fungicide for early
blight is Bravo but Quadris also dose a great job in controlling the
disease. For organic growers, copper is the best product to use.
We found a field with small levels of bacterial spot on tomato. For now,
mostly we are finding foliar problems that do not directly impact the
fruit. Bacterial diseases will always cause fruit problems and should be
treated with copper.
Potatoes
We have late blight close to our region on
Leaf hopper is being found in very high numbers in most fields. Go out
and flop a plant into the row and shake it, than flop the plant to the other
side of the row. Inspect the ground for leaf hoppers that have fallen off the
plant onto the ground. This is an easy way to see what is happening in
the field. We've already started to see some burning on susceptible
varieties. The edges of the leaves will turn dark brown. Eventually
the whole plant will turn brown and die. It's important to pay attention
to leaf hopper because they can seriously decrease yield without being very
evident. For conventional growers, Phaser and Thionex are the insecticides
least toxic to ladybird beetles This is important for aphid
suppression. For organic growers, the options are limited. Pyganic
is the only product that is organic certified that will do the job.
Cornell Recommends
The online version of the 2006 Integrated Crop and Pest Management
Guidelines for Vegetables is now available at
http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/recommends/
--
John Mishanec
Area Vegetable IPM Educator
Cornell Cooperative Extension
Phone 518-434-0016
E-mail [log in to unmask]
11.
Spargel Productions
[log in to unmask] -- ASPARAGUS! (A Stalk-umentary) a film by Anne de Mare
& Kirsten Kelly
We wanted to send out special thanks
to Michiganders Lynn Glaser (Mrs.
Asparagus 1987) and John Bakker (Asparagus Board Director)
who came all The way from Oceana County for the New York Premiere at the Rural
Route Film Festival last weekend! We had a terrific audience for the show and
Great fun at the Aspara-tini After Party, where we served
Organic Vegetable and Crop Outreach Specialist
C.S. Mott Sustainable Food Systems
303 Natural Resources Bldg.
517-353-3542
517-282-3557 (cell)
517-353-3834 (fax)