Print

Print


i can confirm that i got a duplicate email delivery with the following 
header in my inbox:
msg1:

Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on sys14.mail.msu.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0
Envelope-to: [log in to unmask]
Delivery-date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:31:37 -0400
Received: from duct.tape.net ([69.2.38.23])
	by sys14.mail.msu.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1)
	id 1G7dUG-0002XZ-NY
	for [log in to unmask]; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:31:36 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by duct.tape.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD44869940E;
	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:31:33 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from duct.tape.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (duct.tape.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 27122-08; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:31:33 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from duct.tape.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by duct.tape.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C586993DD;
	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:28:34 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: [log in to unmask]
Delivered-To: [log in to unmask]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by duct.tape.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A02698E60
	for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:42:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from duct.tape.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (duct.tape.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 26477-01 for <[log in to unmask]>;
	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:41:32 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from richard2.pil.net (richard2.pil.net [208.8.16.11])
	by duct.tape.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 2524A698E52
	for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:41:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (qmail 92633 invoked by uid 1825); 31 Jul 2006 17:34:42 -0000
Received: from localhost ([log in to unmask])
	by localhost with SMTP; 31 Jul 2006 17:34:42 -0000
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:34:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: [log in to unmask]
X-X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at duct.tape.net
Subject: RE: APC Matrix 5000 question(s)
X-BeenThere: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
List-Id: list.inet-access.net
List-Unsubscribe: <http://inet-access.net/mailman/listinfo/list>,
	<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
List-Archive: <http://inet-access.net/pipermail/list>
List-Post: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
List-Help: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
List-Subscribe: <http://inet-access.net/mailman/listinfo/list>,
	<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Errors-To: [log in to unmask]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at 



msg2:

Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on sys05.mail.msu.edu
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0
Envelope-to: [log in to unmask]
Delivery-date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:16:43 -0400
Received: from duct.tape.net ([69.2.38.23])
	by sys05.mail.msu.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1)
	id 1G7eBv-0005jj-AM
	for [log in to unmask]; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:16:43 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by duct.tape.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8167699750;
	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:16:42 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from duct.tape.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (duct.tape.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 27845-03; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:16:42 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from duct.tape.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by duct.tape.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E206996FD;
	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:13:50 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: [log in to unmask]
Delivered-To: [log in to unmask]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by duct.tape.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324FB698E6B
	for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:42:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from duct.tape.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (duct.tape.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 26472-02 for <[log in to unmask]>;
	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:41:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from richard2.pil.net (richard2.pil.net [208.8.16.11])
	by duct.tape.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 29BC5698E53
	for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:41:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (qmail 92633 invoked by uid 1825); 31 Jul 2006 17:34:42 -0000
Received: from localhost ([log in to unmask])
	by localhost with SMTP; 31 Jul 2006 17:34:42 -0000
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:34:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: [log in to unmask]
X-X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at duct.tape.net
Subject: RE: APC Matrix 5000 question(s)
X-BeenThere: [log in to unmask]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
List-Id: list.inet-access.net
List-Unsubscribe: <http://inet-access.net/mailman/listinfo/list>,
	<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
List-Archive: <http://inet-access.net/pipermail/list>
List-Post: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
List-Help: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
List-Subscribe: <http://inet-access.net/mailman/listinfo/list>,
	<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Errors-To: [log in to unmask]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at duct.tape.net
X-Virus: None found by Clam AV



j

Matt Kolb wrote:
> STeve Andre' writes:
>>    Are others seeing duplicate messages today?  So far, I think
>> I've seen three emails duplicated twice, each.  At first I thought
>> that it was at the remote end, but now that I've seen this with
>> other emais, I don't think so.
>
> I have seen IMAP (and certainly POP3) clients do this in the past.  In 
> briefly investigating the logs, I am not seeing what I would consider 
> duplicate delivery.  Can you cite some examples (time would be good, 
> complete headers would be great).  Again, I'm not seeing anything 
> right off the top that looks like there's a problem on this side.  The 
> best thing to do (assuming no one else responds to this thread 
> in-kind) would be to file a Problem Report with the ACNS help desk 
> (2-6200) and supply whatever information you have.
> ./matt
>