 |
 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris Wolf wrote: > The more I look at it, the more I agree with you that the font size (.6em) > for the left-hand navigation is too small. I can read it as it is, but I > would welcome even a small increase in size, to perhaps .75em. I think they > went overboard in trying to squeeze in too many links in too little space. I'd have to add my voice to the complaints about the secondary menu size. Why not go whole hog, do some link triage, and use the natural size of the font (1 em). People how like to see teeny fonts adjust the size downward. - -- Sven Bohm -.- ..-. ---.. .- KBS-LTER Information Manager http://www.msu.edu/~bohms/public.2005 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDz7ce/1PKtSxCFBERAugqAJ9OkgiiNXpJgbEnMXYz8ZxBGk3qMQCeKGEl h4lTPb0JLWpF0fS6Jn4xzJM= =fk0Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----