 |
 |
Unfortunately I can read every language except Dutch. ;-) P.S. It's all Dutch to me... _____ From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bosman, Don Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 3:36 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Anti-spyware vs. current anti-virus software / suites? On my kids & parents Windows machines, I use HitmanPro http://www.hitmanpro.nl/ followed up by Microsoft's Antispyware. http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/spyware/software/default.mspx If something makes it past that combination the drive will have to be wiped and Linux installed. HitmanPro can take a long time as it automatically runs a growing list of antispyware products. After it finishes you can read a report on which product did what. Don Bosman Information Technologist Michigan State University, Libraries 100 Library East Lansing, MI 48824 517-432-6123 ex 233 [log in to unmask] <http://www.hitmanpro.nl/> -----Original Message----- From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Richard Wiggins Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 3:10 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: [MSUNAG] Anti-spyware vs. current anti-virus software / suites? Last time we discussed this at NAG, several months ago, folks still suggested using not just one, but instead at least two, of the popular anti-spyware titles. Has this recommendation changed since then? How well do the current versions of anti-virus software, or security suites, perform the anti-spyware function? Thanks, /rich