Print

Print


Was the question about an administrative console answered?
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Matthew Farra
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] anti virus recommendation Could you comment on pricing?

Do any of these packages offer some kind of administrative console for central management/monitoring of systems?


--
/-------------------/-------------------/-------------------/-------------------/
Matthew Farra
Microcomputer Hardware/Software Coordinator
Remote Sensing & GIS Research and Outreach Services, Michigan State University
email: [log in to unmask] - phone: 517.432.3720 - fax: 517.353.1821

On 11/1/05, Steve Bogdanski <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I second the bloatware comment.  We here have never been big fans of either Symantec or McAfee for this exact reason (anyone ever had to fix a machine that had Norton SystemWorks installed?).  Over here we use F-Prot Antivirus and have been for about 6 years.  It is a great program for the same reasons mentioned about NOD32, especially the small footprint.  While I am not sure if F-Prot has as high of a stop rate as NOD32, we have never had a problem with any of our PCs as long as they had updated definitions on them.  Besides the price is outstanding in comparison.  I don't have the exact numbers, but if I remember correctly it was ~$5,000 for 3yrs for 1,200 workstations.  Here is there site if anyone wants to check them out: http://www.f-prot.com/index.html.

________________________________________________
Stephen Bogdanski           Network Support, MSU-CVM
Michigan State University   [log in to unmask]
A227 VetMed Center         Phone:          (517) 353-5551
East Lansing, MI 48824     Fax:              (517) 432-2937


>>> Margaret Wilson <[log in to unmask]> 10/31/05 08:35PM >>>
I won't requote prices since Peter has done an excellent job of that
already.  :-)  Unlike many antivirus products (especially Symantec) which
have turned into what I call "bloatware" using up a ton of RAM, NOD32 has a
small footprint and is very configurable.  It also updates daily, sometimes
more than once.  I second Peter's wish that MSU would negotiate reduced
rates with Eset.

Regards,

Margaret

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter J Murray" <[log in to unmask]>
To: < [log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] anti virus recommendation Could you comment on
pricing?


>I got a quote, education is 50% off of retail prices.
>
> It works out to $26 per seat for one year, and $39.20 a seat for two years
> for a smaller quantity (5 seats)
> and
> It works out to $11 per seat for one year, and $17.50 a seat for two years
> for a larger quantity (60 seats)
>
> Sure, Symantec is cheap, but it does not meet expectations.
>
> From what I've seen, it seems that Nod32 is the way to go.  I wish MSU
> would negotiate a nice rate with them (if anyone's listening).
>
> PM
>
>
>
> Bosman, Don wrote:
>
>>I know it will vary based on quantity, but could you share with the list
>>what the costs for NOD32 are?
>>
>>Don Bosman
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
>>Behalf Of Margaret Wilson
>>Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 4:41 PM
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] anti virus recommendation
>>
>>
>>I use NOD32 and have been very pleased.  Nuttin' gets through.  :-)
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Margaret
>>
>
>