 |
 |
Sorry, wrong link on the Linux virtual server project. It should have been ... http://linux-vserver.org/ On 9/16/05 3:34 PM, "Bryan Murphy" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On my last job we used the Linux Virtual Server Project ( > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/) and later switched to Virtuozzo ( > http://www.sw-soft.com/en/products/virtuozzo/). > > Neither worked all that great for our purposes because each virtual > dedicated server had a different client on it so it was always a fight over > who got the most resources. The Linux virtual server project had no way of > limiting cpu and ram consumption on a per virtual server basis hence the > switch to virtuozzo. This took care of that problem by jailing each server > into its own fixed amount of resources making it very slow by default (the > smallest account was capped at 256megs of available physical memory). > > If you will be the owner of all virtual servers on a given physical server > then the Linux virtual server project would be ideal (and is free). > > Hope that helped. > > /------------------------------------ > | Bryan Murphy > | Computer and Network Coordinator > | Plant Research Lab and Plant Biology > | http://infotech.prl.msu.edu > \------------------------------------ > > > On 9/16/05 3:21 PM, "Troy Murray" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Just curious if anyone here on campus is using any type of server >> virtualization software to consolidate servers in their department. >> In particular something like VMWare Server ESX/GSX. >> >> Thanks,