Ozzie Rivera: Appreciate getting your concise and cogent letter to Governor Granholm. It succinctly reflects our discussions at recent conferences & meetings on key concerns and the connection between the KCP Initiative and the Cherry Commission's Report. WR Osvaldo Rivera wrote: > As promised in a recent meeting here is a copy of the letter I sent to > Governor Granholm about the KCP problems dated April 8^th . This same > letter was personally handed to her soon after. > > > > Besides attaching it to this email, I also included it in the text of > this email. > > > > Thanks. > > Osvaldo "Ozzie" Rivera > > Madonna University > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ***************************** > > > > > > April 8, 2005 > > > > > > Honorable Governor Jennifer M. Granholm > > P.O. Box 30013 > > Lansing , MI 48909 > > > > > > Dear Honorable Governor Granholm: > > > > By way of introduction, I am the director of Multicultural Affairs at > Madonna University, a private institution, and also a member of a > state wide network of higher education administrators and program > directors who work directly with the recruitment and retention of > students from historically underrepresented racial and ethnic groups > as well as students from educationally and economically disadvantaged > backgrounds. > > > > The purpose of this letter is to bring to your attention some serious > concerns I have which are shared by a significant number of educators > and administrators from both private and public universities. The > potential impact of proposed language changes for the > King-Chavez-Parks (KCP) Initiative will negatively impact the > aforementioned students. Of particular interest is our concern that > this will have a chilling effect on historically underrepresented > ethnic and racial groups. > > > > We ask for an opportunity to speak to you or to a designated > representative about the issues detailed below. > > > > We were elated when the recent Cherry Commission Report on Higher > Education was released and it championed the goals of increasing and > successfully graduating a greater number of university and college > students here in Michigan . A number of us testified before Commission > hearings, I being one of them. We were especially delighted with your > enthusiastic support of that report. > > > > It does appear that you have not been well served and advised in your > efforts to move ahead with your higher education agenda. Recent > language changes proposed by the Department of Management and Budget > for the Executive Budget Bill re:the King Chavez Parks Initiative go > counter to the spirit of the Commission report and your own goals. > What is proposed is not good policy, is not inclusive and undermines a > commitment to higher education. This will gut successful program > interventions which have been in place for close to two decades and > which have played a critical role in insuring the diversity of our > university and college campuses. This is especially troubling given > that the dollar amount involved, 5.1 million dollars, is a rather > miniscule amount given the state's total budget. Quite frankly more > funds are needed. > > > > Though this letter does not propose to go into extensive analysis I > will offer a few examples to give some indication of some of its > potential impact. > > > > Proposed language would cut out private universities and colleges, > historically a key partner in the fight to retain and graduate > minority students. In recent conversations with my colleagues in > public institutions they have unequivocally stated their opposition to > such a move. > > > > Additional language would cut back college visitation days to only > high school students. Research shows this type of intervention must > start earlier. Our practice has been to include middle school students > in the King Chavez Parks College Days. > > > > Furthermore proposed language limits services to students of color, > whereas KCP funded programs historically have been more encompassing. > > > > Now that the executive budget bill with its proposed language changes > is being discussed within the legislative bodies, many of us who work > so hard around retention issues are fearful that our progress to date > and future efforts are in jeopardy. > > > > We welcome an opportunity to speak to you and/or your designated > representative. I can be reached at (734)432-5541 during regular > business hours. > > > > Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > Osvaldo Rivera > > Director, Office of Multicultural Affairs > > >