 |
 |
STeve Andre' <[log in to unmask]> writes: > On Tuesday 19 April 2005 16:21, m. kolb wrote: >> Peter J Murray <[log in to unmask]> writes: >> > Something that comes up all the time is the fact that people are >> > brushing up against their 64mb quota Its not the quota that bothers >> > them so much (although 64 doesn't seem as big as it used to), it's that >> > they have no notice other than the fact that they stop receiving >> > emails. Is there some plan to offer at least a notification service >> > (and perhaps even a soft quota) via email to let users know that they >> > are hitting the ceiling, or are at least close? >> >> This is being considered. >> >> ./muk > > Realizing fully that money does not grow on trees, I think that raising > the 64M default should be considered. I'm getting an amazing (well, > depressing) amount of spam these days, and have actually hit that > limit when I've been busy and not looked at it for a while. I know that this is also being considered. ./muk