MSU Listserv


AIB-L Archives

AIB-L Archives


AIB-L@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

AIB-L Home

AIB-L Home

AIB-L  November 2018

AIB-L November 2018

Subject:

CALL FOR PAPERS: iBEGIN 2019 - Copenhagen - June 22-23

From:

ari van-assche <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ari van-assche <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:22:17 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Dear AIB Community,

We are pleased to send you the Call for Papers for next year’s iBEGIN Conference which will directly precede the AIB Annual Meeting at the Copenhagen Business School on June 22-23. A great opportunity to do back-to-back conferences and extend your stay in one of Europe’s “hottest” capitals!

Regards,

Ari, Ram and Henrik




International Business, Economic Geography and Innovation

iBEGIN 2019

Ports versus Portals: International Connectivity and the Bundling of Tangibles and Intangibles
June 22-23, 2019

Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

Since 2013, the iBEGIN community has aimed to integrate research on the intersection of the three fields of international business, economic geography, and technology/innovation studies. In addition to the conference theme, we welcome all paper submissions that address the broader iBEGIN research agenda.



Scholars have analyzed the role of advances in information and communication technology as a driver of dramatic changes in business processes and organization (Alcacer et al., 2016; Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014; Leamer & Storper, 2001). The emergence of global value chains and the resulting co-evolution of firms and locations may be seen as a particular case of this wide-ranging megatrend (Cano-Kollmann et al., 2016; Turkina & Van Assche, 2018). An exponential growth in computing power combined with an equally impressive expansion in the network capacity have dramatically reduced both the costs and risks of transmitting codified knowledge across borders. These trends have facilitated MNEs’ ability to tap into previously non-accessible knowledge pockets, allowing them to build key complementarities between intangible assets from different locations (Bathelt et al., 2004; Zhao, 2006).

However, long before information technology began to play a significant role in international business, another type of network undergirded the global economy: maritime transportation networks (Heaver, 2010). While it is well-known that modern international business dates to the dawn of the industrial revolution in the 18th century (Hummels, 2007), the role of the transportation infrastructure, beginning with the clipper ships that carried tea from ports in China and India to the pool of London, has long been “taken for granted”. Driven by technological and organizational innovations, the user cost of this transportation network has fallen over the centuries, with some discontinuous sharp drops. These include major advances in the mid-20th century like containerization (Levinson, 2006; Pedersen and Sornn-Friese, 2015) and the invention of the jet engine (Bernhofen, et al. 2016; Hummels, 2007). The transportation network continues to service international business to this day, ensuring the delivery of its tangible component. This more traditional backbone of international business corresponds in many ways to the Internet backbone laid down at the end of the 20th century and expanded thereafter.

Transportation networks, originally made up of ports and sea lanes and connected through a complex web of agents and intermediaries, but increasingly supplemented with airports and aviation routes are not only important for the transmission of bulky commodity products like coal, iron ore and grain, but are also crucial for knowledge-intensive industries. This is because many knowledge-creating activities need to be bundled with tangible assets for them to be developed, transferred, and often even for them to have meaning. For instance, R&D centers consistently require tangible inputs for the development of new ideas and products (Hannigan & Mudambi, 2015; Pisano & Shih, 2009). Furthermore, MNEs often embed new knowledge that is transferred to foreign partners within the tangible goods that they export (Keller, 2004). A MNE’s ability to develop a global knowledge network should therefore not only be a function of the availability of electronic connectivity, but also on its access to the global network of maritime ports and airports and their hinterlands.

Data from the World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index (Arvis et al., 2018) and UNCTAD’s Liner Shipping Connectivity Index (Hoffmann, 2012) suggest that there is wide heterogeneity in seaport and airport performance around the world. These performance gaps matter for trade, especially within global supply chains. Superior logistics performance is closely associated with bilateral trade growth (Hoekman & Nicita, 2011). A location’s ability to export rapidly is at least as important a source of comparative advantage as the costs of labor, capital and other inputs (Gamberoni et al., 2010; Ma & Van Assche, 2016). This reinforces the point that good logistics performance is a necessary, but often overlooked condition for setting up well-functioning global supply chains (Schotter & Beamish, 2013).

Recent studies add that physical port heterogeneity is taking a new turn. Rather than serving as vertically integrated hubs that compete with one another, but differ in quality and price, seaports are increasingly specializing in particular horizontal niches (Jacobs & Lagendijk, 2014). They are collaborating with each other to offer complementary regional logistics solutions, resulting in increased efficiency. Other studies point out that the cost of moving tangibles is not only a function of infrastructure, but also of industrial organization forces. The ownership of multiple port terminals by multinational entities that implement regional rationalization strategies reinforces the process of port complementarity (Hall & Jacobs, 2010). At the same time, while today’s container shipping industry is characterized by more pro-competitive, cooperative arrangements (consortia, vessel sharing agreements, and strategic alliances), a high proportion of maritime liner shipping was historically priced by conferences, facilitating collusion and anti-competitive pricing (Hummels et al., 2009). This is a response to persistent over-capacity and repeated Bertrand-type “race-to-the-bottom” experiences of the major industry players (Wu, 2012). There is similar evidence in air transport (Micco & Serebrisky, 2006).

Nonetheless, few studies have jointly analyzed the human, physical and digital infrastructural networks and their link with global knowledge and value creation. This is particularly important given that we have established that co-terminus nature of physical and digital networks. Our reading of the current literatures leads us to conclude that this lacuna may be the result of the disciplinary focus of most research. Hence we would like to expect inter-, multi-, and cross-disciplinary approaches to yield important new insights. The foundational disciplines of iBEGIN (international business, economic geography and innovation studies) form the starting point, but we expect that this exercise will also be informed by many others, like comparative political economy, economic and business history, international economics and supply chain management.

There are a number of crucial questions related to the conference theme that we believe are important for both theory and policy:

·         How dependent are intangibles on tangibles for their value creation? Are these tangibles disproportionately sourced locally or imported?

·         How important is goods trade for the inter-firm transfer of intangible knowledge

·         How does maritime and air connectivity matter for a location’s innovation performance and international innovation partnerships?

·         How has the structure of the maritime and air transport network evolved, and why?

·         How does spatial heterogeneity at different geographical scales drive the location choice and network design of terminal operators, shipping lines and air cargo companies?

·         What is the role of the network of representatives, branch offices and third-party intermediaries established by shipping lines, as well as their collaborators in conferences, consortia and alliances in shaping the shipping lines’ internationalization strategies?

·         Have ports and clusters changed their international connectivity strategies in response to global value chains and the rising importance of intangibles?

·         What are the internationalization strategies of multinational port terminal operators, shipping lines and air cargo companies?

·         How can government policy strengthen locations’ logistics performance (in terms of liner and air shipping connectivity) in the era of global value chains?

KEY DATES:

Submission of extended abstracts: February 1, 2019
Authors notified by: February 15, 2019
Conference dates: June 22-23, 2019.

SUBMISSIONS:

Submit extended abstracts to: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Submission format: extended abstracts (“SMS-style” submissions – 5-7 pages)

FURTHER INFORMATION:

Program Co-chairs: Henrik Sornn-Friese ([log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>) and Ari Van Assche ([log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>)
iBEGIN Convener:  Ram Mudambi ([log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>)

REFERENCES


Alcacer, J., Cantwell, J., & Piscitello, L. 2016. Internationalization in the information age: a new era for places, firms and international business networks? Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5): 499-512.

Arvis, J. F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2018). Connecting to Compete 2018: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. World Bank.


Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31-56.

Bernhofen, D., El-Sahli, Z., & Kneller, R. 2016. Estimating the effect of the container revolution on world trade. Journal of International Economics, 98(1): 36-50.

Brynjolfsson, E. & McAfee, A. 2014. The second machine age: work, progress and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW. Norton & Co.


Cano-Kollmann, M., Cantwell, J., Hannigan, T.J., Mudambi, R. & Song, J. 2016. Knowledge connectivity: an agenda for innovation research international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3): 255-263.


Gamberoni, E., Lanz, R., & Piermartini, R. 2010. Timeliness and contract enforceability in intermediate goods trade. WTO Working Paper ERSD-2010-14.


Hall, P. & Jacobs, W. 2010. Shifting proximities: the maritime port sector in an era of global supply chains. Regional Studies, 44(9): 1103-115.

Hannigan, T.J. & Mudambi, R. 2015. Local R&D won’t help you go global. Harvard Business Review online, June 25.

Heaver, T. D. 2010. The Dynamic Role of International Shipping in Business Structures and Relationships. In Van de Voorde, E. & Vanelslander, T. (eds.), Applied Transport Economics. Uitgeverji De Boeck.


Hoekman, B. & Nicita, A. 2011. Trade policy, trade costs and developing country trade.
World Development, 39(12): 2069-2079.

Hoffmann, J. 2012. Corridors of the Sea: An investigation into liner shipping connectivity. In Alix, Y (ed.), Les Corridors de Transport. EMS.

Hummels, D. 2007. Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3): 131-154.


Hummels, D., Lugovskyy, V. & Skiba, A. 2009. The trade reducing effects of market power in international shipping. Journal of Development Economics, 89(1): 84-97.


Jacobs, W. & Lagendijk, A. 2014. Strategic coupling as capacity: how seaports connect to global flows of containerized transport. Global Networks, 14(1): 44-62.

Keller, W. 2004. International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3): 752-782.

Leamer, E. E., & Storper, M. 2001. The economic geography of the Internet age. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4): 641-665.

Levinson, M. 2006. The Box. How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger. Princeton University Press.


Ma, A. & Van Assche, A. 2016. Spatial linkages and export processing locations in China. World Economy, 39(3): 316-338.

Micco, A. & Serebrisky, T. 2006. Competition regimes and air transport costs: the effects of open skies agreements. Journal of International Economics, 70(1): 25-51.

Pedersen, T. & Sornn-Friese, H. 2015. A Business Model Innovation by an Incumbent Late Mover: Containerization in Maersk Line. In Foss, N. & Saebi, T. (eds.), Business Model Innovation: The Organizational Dimension. Oxford University Press.

Pisano, G., & Shih, W. 2009. Restoring American competitiveness. Harvard Business Review, 87(7-8): 114-125.

Schotter, A. & Beamish, P. 2013. The hassle factor: an explanation for managerial location shunning. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5): 521-544.

Turkina, E. & Van Assche, A. 2018. Global connectedness and local innovation in industrial clusters. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(6): 706-728.


Wu, W. (2012). Capacity utilization and its determinants for a container shipping line: theory and evidence. Applied Economics, 44(27): 3491-3502.


Zhao, M. 2006. Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 52(8): 1185-1199.


--
[HEC]<http://www.hec.ca/>

Ari Van Assche, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of International Business

[hecca]<http://www.hec.ca/>

[Agrements]

3000, chemin de la Côte‑Sainte‑Catherine, Montréal (Québec) H3T 2A7
Téléphone : 514 340-6043  Télécopieur : 514 340-6987


[recyclez]



Pensons à l'environnement
avant d'imprimer





____
AIB-L is brought to you by the Academy of International Business.
For information: http://aib.msu.edu/community/aib-l.asp
To post message: [log in to unmask]
For assistance:  [log in to unmask]
AIB-L is a moderated list.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager