MSU Listserv


CSSAMSU Archives

CSSAMSU Archives


CSSAMSU@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

CSSAMSU Home

CSSAMSU Home

CSSAMSU  August 2013

CSSAMSU August 2013

Subject:

How to choose PhD advisor

From:

Judy Chung <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Judy Chung <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:02:38 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (134 lines)

How to choose PhD advisor
Peter Chen 
http://bbs.creaders.net/education/bbsviewer.php?trd_id=884488


	Most PhD students do not realize that their career fates in US or other industrialized
countries are often determined on the day they have chosen their PhD advisors.
Typically, an average PhD candidate in a US university is intelligent enough to
become a CEO of a company, a wall-street trader, or a professor in a US major research
university. However, most PhD graduates will not end up at their desirable jobs,
even if they work very hard and have strong motivations. In fact, many top university
PhD graduates cannot find decent jobs in US, while many people who earn their
PhD degrees from median universities become professors, industrial leaders, CEOs,
etc. Unfortunately, many PhD students are misled by the rankings of
universities and particularly the rankings of undergraduate colleges. An
essential fact is that in this top level of professional trainings, it is one’s
PhD advisor, rather than one’s university, that determines one’s career future. 


	 


	For a hard-working PhD candidate, one can foresee his/her
career fate by the job statistics of one’s PhD advisor’s former PhD graduates. For
a senior professor who has produced more than 10 PhD graduates, the job statistics
is quite accurate. If 75% of the former PhD graduates are currently professors in
major research universities, then an average current student in the group will
most likely end up as a professor in a major research university in the future
too. Similarly, if 75% of the former PhD graduates cannot find jobs, then an
average current PhD student in the group will most likely become unemployed on
the day of his/her graduation. Note that for chemistry, physics, mathematics,
computer science, etc, one can find a list of one’s former group members at
genealogy webpages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_genealogy.


	 


	Additionally, if one’s PhD advisor is a very senior professor who is
near the end of his/her career, one has to pay a close attention to the job
statistics of recent PhD graduates in the past 5 years. Very often, such a
senior professor is in a rapidly decaying (old) field and does not have the
energy and knowledge to move to a new field (why bother if one is going to
retire in 5 years?). Then, his/her current students will be most likely to face
more difficulties in finding desirable jobs than group’s statistics would
suggest. There are exceptions, though --- some true researchers always enjoy
new ideas and new fields. However, such senior professors are few and far
between.        


	 


	On the other hand, if one’s PhD advisor is a junior professor who has
not yet produced enough PhD graduates to offer a good statistics, then there is
more uncertainty. Sometimes, an excellent student can help shaping the
advisor’s career profile in this situation. A good thing is that the junior
professor usually works hard and tries to get his/her tenure. However, in
general, a junior advisor offers less help in your career development. In this
case, the ranking of one’s university may play a more important role in one’s
job hunting. 


	 


	If you are a foreign PhD student, you actually should use the aforementioned
job statistics with caution because it is not applicable to you directly. It is
typically more difficulty for a foreign PhD student to find a desirable job in
US, such as a faculty position, than one’s American lab-mates. Typically, to
offset one’s culture and language disadvantages, foreign PhD students need to put
about threefold more effort to achieve the same career goals. For example, if
it takes about 4 papers for an average America PhD student to find a faculty
job, an average foreign PhD student may have to produce more than 10 papers of the
same quality to find a similar faculty position. Therefore, one should pay more
attention to the statistics of former foreign PhD graduates in the lab, which
is more suitable for one’s case. If one cannot find all data for the statistics
of one’s advisor’ former PhD graduates, one can check a couple of other crucial
indicators, namely, advisor’s publication record and grant record. Publication
record can be easily found at ``Web of Science’’. One should pay a close
attention to the publication in the last five years, which are roughly
equivalent to the publication period of a student with his/her advisor.  If a PhD advisor publishes only about 2 papers with each of his/her
typical PhD student and the number of papers for a successful job seeker on the
job market is 8, the PhD candidate will have a great difficulty to fulfill
his/her job goal with such an advisor.  


	 


	Note that one’s career development depends crucially on one’s advisor’s
academic status, reputation and connection. A minimal requirement for an advisor
to be a qualified one is that he/she should regularly have external research
grants in his/her career, except for people in some disciplines such as social
sciences and liberal arts where federal research grants might be rare.  This is not an issue for a PhD candidate who is
supported by a research assistantship (RA) from his/her advisor. On the other
hand, if one is, or is going to be, supported by a teaching assistantship (TA)
from one’s department, one has to watch out pitfalls. Many advisors might never
have any external grant, which means their academic statuses are very low in
their fields. Typically, by playing local politics, these advisors are able to have
PhD students either as their cannon fodders or as their career savers (Be aware
that people who are inactive in research usually have much more time to play local
politics). Unfortunately, these advisors might deliberately conceal partial or
full information from their (potential) students. However, it is quite easy to do
an ``Award Search’’ in public domains to find out an advisor’s grant situation.
The National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Health Institute (NIH) are
among the most respected funding agencies. There are some other useful indications
of academic status: committees of professional organizations and conferences,
editorships of international journals, and panels of federal funding agencies. In
fact, NIH study section members are in public domain. Typically, a PhD
candidate’s career is on a dead-end track if his/her advisor’s academic status
is very low.  To avert this fate, one should
either switch to a qualified advisor or change a school as soon as possible.


	 


	Finally, a good advisor is typically willing to spend time on his/her
students, cares about his/her students’ career development, responses to
students’ needs and first of all, has a superb job record for his/her former
PhD graduates. However, what contributes to a good advisor is a complicated and
subjective issue. A good PhD advisor for one student might not be a good one
for another person.  The last word is
that it makes no sense to spend about four or five years to pursue a PhD degree
if it does not lead you to a decent career.   		 	   		  
================================================================
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe CSSAMSU mailing list, please go to:

     http://list.msu.edu/archives/cssamsu.html

Click "Join or leave the list". For further assistance, please
contact Jerry McAllister [log in to unmask]
================================================================

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
July 2023
June 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
July 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
November 2021
September 2021
August 2021
April 2021
March 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager