We use awstats for well over 100 sites. it's satisfactory. it does the
robot separation stuff mentioned. it does by-country
tracking/breakdowns as of a recent update. it's done all we've ever
asked it to do in terms of gathering stats. we used analog for a while
too, it was also satisfactory, we just had to choose one or the other
for uniformity. the price for both is right, free, open-source. if you
are really interested i could give you a link to an example stats page
of ours to get a look at it's output, just msg.
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 18:09 -0400, Chris Wolf wrote:
> We looked at these last year, trying to find a replacement for WebTrends
> which we had been using for years, but which had grown too complicated and
> too expensive. We chose SawMill http://www.sawmill.net/, primarily because
> it was the only low-priced one that seemed serious about identifying visits
> from spiders and eliminating them from the stats. Unfortunately, their Lite
> version, which is free, probably won't meet most people's needs. We went
> with a 5-profile license for SawMill Professional, which was $320 with the
> educational discount.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Renee Starkey [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 2:37 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [MSUNAG] Apache log analyzer
>
> Hello
>
> Any one familiar with a good log analyzer for an apache web server?
>
> --
> Renee Starkey @-}-----}-----
> Information Technologist I
> 115 Old Horticulture
> Language Learning Center, Michigan State University
> Phone: 517-355-7587
> Fax: 517-432-5246
|