It sounds to me like one more of those cases where you HAVE TO upgrade,
even when you know that there is no direct benefit, but not to be left
behind, because they decided to change a few basic things.
Jon Galbreath wrote:
> The file format changes for one. The free converter kits from Microsoft can patch Office 2003 so they open documents, but some templates don't work with the converters. Also there is the issue of possible features that are lost in the conversion process. I don't have any examples of what may or may not convert correctly, but I do know that even with the converters installed across the board here, they're not a guaranteed solution to avoid the upgrade.
>
> Jon Galbreath
> MCSE/Security+
> Systems Administrator
> International Studies and Programs
> Ph: 517-884-2144
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Oscar Castaneda
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:39 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Office 2003 or 2007?
>
> In this unit, users work with 20% of what Office is about. Nobody uses
> outlook. Nobody uses access. They all are big on word and powerpoint,
> but still at a basic level on terms of what features are used.
>
> My question would be: what is new in Office 2007 that is worth the
> upgrade for a group like mine?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Scott Smith wrote:
>
>> We're going to be starting the update in HR in a couple of weeks, I'm
>> told. The guys say they are going to do a GPO upgrade, and I think
>> they have tested it out, so this may not be correct information.
>>
>> I have been using it for over a year. It takes some getting used to
>> coming out of 2003, but I find that I like it better. It was worth the
>> switch for me.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> *On Behalf Of *Troy Murray
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:48 PM
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Subject:* Re: [MSUNAG] Office 2003 or 2007?
>>
>> I'm curious how Office 2007 installs are happening. In the past I've
>> deployed both Office 2002 and Office 2003 using GPO and it worked
>> seamlessly and with ease. In looking at some of the resource kit
>> documentation, I'm lead to believe that you cannot do a GPO install of
>> Office 2007 like you did with Office 2002 and 2003, is that correct?
>>
>> -t
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Ehren Benson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Any new installs are getting 2007, people with 2003/XP are getting
>> upgraded as they request it.
>>
>> Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
>> Windows Systems Administrator
>>
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> 517-884-5469
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>> Behalf Of Cheryl Akers
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:31 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [MSUNAG] Office 2003 or 2007?
>>
>> We're in the middle of deciding of we need to upgrade.
>>
>> Our department is still on Office 2003. Are you all upgrading to 2007 or
>> are you still on 2003?
>> Cheryl
>>
>> Cheryl Akers, MS, CNA - [log in to unmask]
>> Microcomputer Support - Microbiology and Molecular Genetics
>> 2228C Biomedical Physical Sciences
>> Michigan State University
>> East Lansing, MI 48824
>>
>> 517-884-5298
>>
>> "I try to take one day at a time, but sometimes, several days attack me
>> at once."
>> Jennifer Unlimited
>>
>> --
>> Troy Murray
>> Systems/Database Administrator
>> Michigan State University
>>
>> Clinical And Translational Sciences
>>
>>
>> Biomedical Research Informatics Core (BRIC)
>> 100 Conrad Hall
>> East Lansing, MI 48824
>> Phone: 517-432-4248
>> Fax: 517-353-9420
>> E-mail: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> AOL IM: troymurray72
>>
>>
>
> --
> Oscar Castaneda
> Michigan State University
>
>
>
--
Oscar Castaneda
Michigan State University
|
