And for the record, I see that my own post to MSUNAG about "possible
spam" messages also got labelled as "possible spam". So it goes.
-- dkm
At 12/22/2008 02:21 PM Monday, David McFarlane wrote:
>OK, what's going on? First a post from Victor Lounds, and then one
>from Lee Duynslager labelled as "possible spam" (see copied header
>below), and I suspect this is just the beginning. Did we change
>something to the campus spam filter to create a bunch of false
>positves, or do we just have a rash of users coincidentaly sending
>messages that look like spam?
>
>Thanks,
>-- dkm
>
>
>At 12/22/2008 01:59 PM Monday, Lee Duynslager wrote:
>>X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system
>>"mx56.mail.msu.edu", has
>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The
>> original message
>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't
>> spam) or label
>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see
>> [log in to unmask] for details.
>> Content preview: I've already called the helpdesk about
>> this. Does anybody
>> know the maximum attachment size for the new MSU
>> webmail? From what the attachment
>> upload screen shows it is 2mb. Is that a mistake, because
>> before our users
>> could send 10mb of attachments right? [...]
>> Content analysis details: (-1.0 points, 5.0 required)
>> pts rule name description
>> ---- ----------------------
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
>> http://www.dnswl.org/, low
>> trust
>> [35.8.2.205 listed in list.dnswl.org]
>> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
|