MSU Listserv


MSUNAG Archives

MSUNAG Archives


MSUNAG@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG  March 2008

MSUNAG March 2008

Subject:

Re: firewall hardware

From:

Adam McDougall <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Adam McDougall <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:24:23 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (96 lines)

Both of these posts remind me of a similar device I saw mentioned on a FreeBSD 
mailing list recently:
http://www.axiomtek.com/products/ViewProduct.asp?view=429

That one has 7 built in Gig ports each with its own PCI Express 1x lane
(sufficient for full gig speed). 

If I were building more firewalls myself, I would probably investigate 
such devices, but keeping in mind nice features off the shelf servers can
offer such as a remote graphical console, ssh-able remote serial console,
and (compared to canned solutions) the ability to install commonly available
network analysis or diagnostic tools at a network point where they are 
most useful.  

You may consider having extra network ports on it which get linked to 
various switches or devices on your network that allow you to get a 
remote view of your network traffic at critical points other than the 
firewall itself. 

PF has some interesting but realistic paranoia features on a low level,
some of which can only be enabled when using routing instead of bridging.
PF can also be used in FreeBSD or NetBSD at least; I think FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE
contains PF from OpenBSD 4.1, and earlier releases of FreeBSD contained an
earlier version of PF. 

I believe the largest factor in how many packets per second a PC can forward
is the L1 cache size.  AMD tends to win here, and the Intel Quad cores are 
deficient in L1 size.  If this is for on campus use, demands probably aren't
extremely high and pretty much any reasonably modern PC should suffice.  
Its also worth sizing it for maximum transfer speed even if it is not realistic,
so you are aware of what bottleneck the firewall may be imposing on future needs
or bursts.  The PC will probably not even notice a normal amount of traffic.

Hard drive will be insignificant unless you plan on logging alot or logging
intensively.  You pretty much only use it to boot from otherwise.  I'd still
recommend setting up two hard drives in a software or hardware mirror AND 
MONITOR IT.  The alternatives all seem to either offer less redundancy or 
more dependancies, and/or be more difficult to update if you feel like upgrading
software.  

If you need any non-copper interfaces, you may want to consider externals means
for converting a copper connection from your firewall to the uplink (fibre?).
Fibre cards are expensive to fit into specific slot sizes in servers and 
finding drivers might be more obscure or less reliable than a standardized
copper gig port.  It adds another point of failure, but on the other hand,
something external is easier to replace than an internal card, perhaps cheaper,
and doesn't require a power cycle. 

On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 08:46:43AM -0500, Troy Murray wrote:

  I'm preparing to install a third and fourth Astaro Security Gateway device 
  that offers the same functionality that you outline before.  You can 
  purchase a hardware device with their software, or, put their software on a 
  system you have available.
  
  Their hardware devices can be found here:
  http://www.astaro.com/our_products/astaro_security_gateway/hardware_appliances/model_comparison
  
  -t
  
  
  On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:42 AM, Eric Weston wrote:
  
>> I'm collecting opinions regarding hardware to use for a firewall. If you
>> are interested in weighing in on this subject, I'm interested to hear
>> your ideas.
>> 
>> The hypothetical firewall is a purpose built OpenBSD box running OpenBSD
>> Packet Filter (pf), on a box that bridges the outside world to a
>> protected network of approximately 1000 nodes. The box needs to have a
>> network interface for administrative access via ssh, and two
>> high-throughput network interfaces to provide the "bridge" from the
>> protected network to the internet.
>> 
>> Given this general scenario, what sort of box might you purchase and/or
>> assemble for this purpose? What elements would you consider critical?
>> (architecture, interfaces, harddrive or alternative, CPU, etc..)
>> 
>> 
>>   Thanks,
>>                Eric Weston, Libraries
  
  -- 
  Troy Murray
  Developer
  Michigan State University
  Biomedical Research and Informatics Center (BRIC)
  100 Conrad Hall
  East Lansing, MI 48824
  Phone: 517-432-4248
  Fax: 517-353-9420
  E-mail: [log in to unmask]
  Calendar
  HTML - http://www.icalx.com/html/troymurray72/month.php?cal=BRIC+Work
  iCalendar - http://www.icalx.com/public/troymurray72/BRIC%20Work.ics
  

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2023
June 2023
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
January 2019
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager