MSU Listserv


MSUNAG Archives

MSUNAG Archives


MSUNAG@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG  May 2007

MSUNAG May 2007

Subject:

Penetration testing

From:

Eric Weston <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 15 May 2007 11:30:12 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (91 lines)

The latest issue of CRYPTO-GRAM had a number of interesting articles,
and in particular, one regarding penetration testing. Those of you who
attended the SANs training recently will recall Eric Cole mentioning
many times his company doing pen testing. Here is the article, for those
of you who don't subscribe to CRYPTO-GRAM.


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

      Is Penetration Testing Worth It?



There are security experts who insist penetration testing is essential
for network security, and you have no hope of being secure unless you
do
it regularly. And there are contrarian security experts who tell you
penetration testing is a waste of time; you might as well throw your
money away. Both of these views are wrong. The reality of penetration
testing is more complicated and nuanced.

Penetration testing is a broad term. It might mean breaking into a
network to demonstrate you can. It might mean trying to break into a
network to document vulnerabilities. It might involve a remote attack,
physical penetration of a data center or social engineering attacks. It
might use commercial or proprietary vulnerability scanning tools, or
rely on skilled white-hat hackers. It might just evaluate software
version numbers and patch levels, and make inferences about
vulnerabilities.

It's going to be expensive, and you'll get a thick report when the
testing is done.

And that's the real problem. You really don't want a thick report
documenting all the ways your network is insecure. You don't have the
budget to fix them all, so the document will sit around waiting to make
someone look bad. Or, even worse, it'll be discovered in a breach
lawsuit. Do you really want an opposing attorney to ask you to explain
why you paid to document the security holes in your network, and then
didn't fix them? Probably the safest thing you can do with the report,
after you read it, is shred it.

Given enough time and money, a pen test will find vulnerabilities;
there's no point in proving it. And if you're not going to fix all the
uncovered vulnerabilities, there's no point uncovering them. But there
is a way to do penetration testing usefully. For years I've been saying
security consists of protection, detection and response--and you need
all three to have good security. Before you can do a good job with any
of these, you have to assess your security. And done right, penetration
testing is a key component of a security assessment.

I like to restrict penetration testing to the most commonly exploited
critical vulnerabilities, like those found on the SANS Top 20 list. If
you have any of those vulnerabilities, you really need to fix them.

If you think about it, penetration testing is an odd business. Is there
an analogue to it anywhere else in security? Sure, militaries run these
exercises all the time, but how about in business? Do we hire burglars
to try to break into our warehouses? Do we attempt to commit fraud
against ourselves? No, we don't.

Penetration testing has become big business because systems are so
complicated and poorly understood. We know about burglars and
kidnapping
and fraud, but we don't know about computer criminals. We don't know
what's dangerous today, and what will be dangerous tomorrow. So we hire
penetration testers in the belief they can explain it.

There are two reasons why you might want to conduct a penetration test.
One, you want to know whether a certain vulnerability is present
because
you're going to fix it if it is. And two, you need a big, scary report
to persuade your boss to spend more money. If neither is true, I'm
going
to save you a lot of money by giving you this free penetration test:
You're vulnerable.

Now, go do something useful about it.

This essay appeared in the March issue of "Information Security," as
the
first half of a point/counterpoint with Marcus Ranum.
http://informationsecurity.techtarget.com/magItem/0,291266,sid42_gci1245619,00.html
or http://tinyurl.com/yrjwol

Marcus's half:
http://www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/editorials/point-counterpoint/pentesting.html
or http://tinyurl.com/23ephv


** *** ***** ******* *********** *************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2023
June 2023
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
January 2019
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager