MSU Listserv


EQUITY Archives

EQUITY Archives


EQUITY@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

EQUITY Home

EQUITY Home

EQUITY  March 2007

EQUITY March 2007

Subject:

MDCR Report- Detroit News 3/7/07

From:

Rudy Redmond <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Retention & Graduation Issues Concerning Minorities in Higher Education <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:43:46 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (34 lines)

Report: Collective bargaining, foster care among state programs in jeopardy because of Prop 2

Marisa Schultz / The Detroit News

LANSING -- Proposal 2 does not end the promotion of diversity in the state of Michigan but it has put eight state programs in jeopardy, according to a report released today by the Michigan Civil Rights Commission.

State statutes that appear to violate the new constitutional amendment are in the areas of collective bargaining agreements, foster care, higher education, Commission on Spanish Speaking Affairs, minority- and women-owned businesses, minority student grants, single business tax credits and special-needs adoption.

"It would be wrong to say that Proposal 2 has not had an impact on state operations. * These are real services to real people in the state of Michigan," said Linda V. Parker, director of the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, which prepared the report on behalf of the commission.

In November, 58 percent of Michigan voters approved Proposal 2, a constitutional amendment that bans the use of race and gender preferences in university admissions and government hiring and contracting.

Two days after the election, on Nov. 9, Gov. Jennifer Granholm issued an executive order to the commission to study the impact of Proposal 2 on state government programs and how to preserve diversity within the confines of the new law.

Members of the department interviewed leaders at 17 state departments and six other state agencies. The secretary of state and attorney general departments declined to be interviewed, Parker said.

With two exceptions, none of the departments or agencies used affirmative action plans that discriminate or use preferential treatment in their hiring or contracting processes. And the two departments that do -- the Michigan Department of Transportation and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality -- must retain these affirmative action programs in order to comply with federal law, the report said.

Proposal 2's language makes an exception for programs that are needed in order to maintain federal funding.

One of the most significant findings of the report, Parker said, is the opportunity for the state to pursue more federal funding, which would allow the promotion of diversity to continue.

"Federal funding to any state is a win/win. Under Proposal 2, federal funding which has affirmative action requirements attached to it are not a violation of Proposal 2 and we have an opportunity to pursue that," Parker said.

However, some proponents of Proposal 2 questioned whether the pursuit for more federal funding would be an attempt to skirt the law.

"I have a fear that you are going to try to use this to circumvent Prop 2 and the will of the people," Chetly Zarko, a former communications director for the group that got Prop 2 on the ballot, told the commission . "We will be watching you."

Zarko and others have challenged whether the federal government actually requires contractors to use preferential treatment.

Now the report will head to the governor. It will be up to her, lawmakers and state departments to review the recommendations and decide what action to take.

You can reach Marisa Schultz at (313) 222-2310 or at [log in to unmask] 
http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070307/UPDATE/703070451/1003

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2020
March 2018
August 2017
February 2017
October 2016
July 2016
June 2016
April 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager