MSU Listserv


EQUITY Archives

EQUITY Archives


EQUITY@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

EQUITY Home

EQUITY Home

EQUITY  December 2006

EQUITY December 2006

Subject:

Gongwer TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19 2006

From:

Rudy Redmond <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Retention & Graduation Issues Concerning Minorities in Higher Education <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:59:41 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (109 lines)

NEW SUIT SEEKS TO DULL PROP 2 EFFECT; JUDGE OK'S DELAY


Voter approval of Proposal 2006-2, barring the use of most race- and
gender-based affirmative action programs by public entities, cannot
override the constitutional right of universities to take race and
gender into account when establishing the make-up of their student
bodies, a new lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Detroit on Tuesday
contends. 


The new lawsuit was assigned to U.S. District Judge David Lawson, who
earlier in the day approved an agreement by the state and the state's
three largest universities to delay the implementation of Proposal 2
until no later than July 1.

http://www.aclumich.org/FinalComplaint.pdf

The NAACP and ACLU, representing students, faculty and applicants, said
in its new case that Proposal 2 cannot undercut the right of
universities, most recently established in a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court
decision regarding UM admissions policies, to consider race and gender
as one factor in their admissions process. 


The suit alleges the new language does not ban programs that use race
or gender in the admissions process, and in fact argued that such an
interpretation would "place an unconstitutional burden on the ability of
protected groups to advance their interests and rights while leaving
others, such as legatees, athletes, and veterans, free to advance theirs
without any similar burdens."


Those are similar to new arguments submitted by the group By Any Means
Necessary in a revised complaint filed Monday in its lawsuit that
brought the Proposal 2 controversy to the federal court.


"Affirmative Action is still the law of the land," said Wendell
Anthony, president of the Detroit chapter of the NAACP.   "We have come
too far to allow the doors of opportunity to be shut in the face of the
American promise of liberty and justice."


And ACLU Executive Director Kary Moss said, "We are pleased to be able
to represent current students and faculty, as well as prospective
students, in a case that will be the first to evaluate exactly what
Proposal 2 means in this state." 


The lead plaintiff in the case is U-M student Chase Cantrell, an
African-American who said he selected the Ann Arbor campus because it
was "so much more dynamic" than the Cornell Law School where he had also
been accepted. 


The order (USDC docket No. 15024) issued by Mr. Lawson to delay
implementation of the new constitutional language means the University
of Michigan, Michigan State University and Wayne State University may
complete their current admissions and financial aid process under their
existing policies giving additional weight to applicants who are from
racial minority groups or are women.


The new amendment was to have gone into effect Saturday, a date that
will still apply to other public entities that must end their
preference-based programs.


Attorney General Mike Cox said in a statement that the stipulated
agreement to delay implementation of the amendment as it applies to
universities "upholds Proposal 2 and the will of the people."


In exchange for winning a delay in adhering to the new ban on
affirmative action programs, the universities agreed to drop their
cross-claim in the lawsuit challenging the amendment as violating the
U.S. Constitution, and to not file other constitutional claims against
the proposal.


But Alan Foutz of the Pacific Legal Foundation, which sought to enter
the case on Monday, said the agreement does not prevent the universities
from filing a later challenge against Proposal 2.


Governor Jennifer Granholm, a defendant in the case, was also a party
to the agreed delay. She said the state is continuing to review the
implications of the amendment as it applies to government. "Clearly we
are committed to diversity," she said. 


George Washington, an attorney for the group By Any Means Necessary
that initiated the court challenge, said the agreement to delay its
application to universities was "a good first step toward undoing
Proposal 2."

Meanwhile, the city of Lansing filing a motion to obtain a delay
similar to the one given universities in order to have the amendment go
into effect when the city's fiscal year begins July 1.   It argues it
has contractual commitments and hiring procedures that cannot be quickly
abandoned.


Mayor Virg Bernero said, "Like the state universities, we need time to
evaluate our hiring and procurement processes and to make whatever
adjustments are needed to comply with the law."   But he also said he is
committed to continuing to do everything possible to "uphold the
principles of inclusion and equality."

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2020
March 2018
August 2017
February 2017
October 2016
July 2016
June 2016
April 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager