MSU Listserv


EQUITY Archives

EQUITY Archives


EQUITY@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

EQUITY Home

EQUITY Home

EQUITY  October 2006

EQUITY October 2006

Subject:

Diverse Online

From:

Rudy Redmond <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Retention & Graduation Issues Concerning Minorities in Higher Education <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:19:39 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (71 lines)

From Diverse Online

Current News
Scholars Gear Up to Defend School Desegregation 
By Christina Asquith
Oct 13, 2006, 07:11

As the U.S. Supreme Court gears up to hear a school desegregation case brought on by parent groups in Seattle and Louisville, Ky., a group of legal and education scholars filed briefs this week in support of desegregation efforts.

“What is at issue is this country’s promise made 52 years ago in Brown v. Board of Education and how much is left of that promise,” said Theodore M. Shaw, president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund.

More than 600 people and organizations signed briefs supporting what the NAACP calls “voluntary integration efforts.” Among those were 553 university social scientists, arguing in a lengthy brief that decades of research show that segregation is unhealthy and unproductive. 

The Supreme Court will begin hearing oral arguments on Dec. 4 involving a case in Seattle, (Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1) and in Louisville, Ky., (Meredith v. Jefferson County Public Schools). In both cases, local education officials in urban school districts designed enrollment plans that encouraged racial diversity while still allowing children to attend neighborhood schools and have some measure of school choice. These efforts were challenged by parent groups, who filed lawsuits claiming that the consideration of race was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

 The school districts have won in federal, district and appellate courts. However, the Supreme Court agreed to review the issue on appeal. U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings has weighed in against using race in admissions, as have officials from the U.S. Department of Justice, arguing that the school districts’ efforts are “unconstitutional.” 

With Justice Sandra Day O Connor’s resignation and Bush’s recent appointments of conservative justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito, it is uncertain how the court will rule. 

“Everyone’s watching to see what kind of new court this will be. We know we need at least five votes,” Shaw says.

 Leading the team of social scientists backing the school districts is Dr. Gary Orfield, director of the Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. 

Research by Orfield shows that segregated schools tend to be unequal in many respects: They have higher concentrations of poverty, less opportunity for student to understand each other and lack diverse perspectives. Predominantly minority schools have less qualified teachers who leave more rapidly. They also have many more teachers out of subject areas, less Advanced Placement courses and more instability in enrollment because parents are moving.

Orfield surveyed students in Louisville and Seattle, and says they reported high levels of appreciation for the opportunity to learn and understand each other and work in multiracial communities. 

“We’re amazed. People should realize there’s a vast body of scientific evidence supporting desegregation,” Orfield says.      

 The case has become a lightening rod in part because of rising segregation in the 1990s. Orfield says the increase in segregation is a result of the changing population in the United States and growth of residentially segregated areas, especially for Hispanics. 

“There’s been a dismantling of desegregation orders that were successful in the South,” he says.

In Seattle, the 46,000-student district has suspended since 2002 its “racial tiebreaker” policy. Seattle schools have an “open choice” policy that allows students to attend any school. Race was allowed to be used as one criterion for admission when demand outpaced capacity. But when White children were denied admission to Ballard High School in favor of minority students who lived further away, angry parents formed a group called “Parents Involved in Community Schools.” The group argues that considering race is a violation of the Constitution, the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the voter-approved Initiative 200, a state law forbidding preferential treatment on the basis of race, ethnicity or gender.

In Louisville, parent Crystal Meredith claims the district’s policy denied her son, Joshua, a transfer to a better school because he is White.

Francisco Negron, general counsel for the National School Board Association, says the case is about allowing local districts to decide for themselves what’s in the best interests of the students. 

“It’s important the court not replace the judgment of local school boards,” he says. “This is not a federally mandated one size fits all.”

In an interview with the Seattle Post Intelligencer, PICS President Kathleen Brose said, “It’s been years, and I still feel as strongly about the case today as when we first started. If we were truly racist, we would be out of here, living in the White suburbs. What we really want people to understand is that we’re not against diversity, we’re for neighborhood schools.”

-Christina Asquith

 

Reader comments on this story:
 
There are currently 2 reader comments on this story:
 
“a tool for optimizing holistic diversity”
After reading your this article, it is clear that several scholars are making the case for desegregation by referencing known pros and cons of desegregation ; however, I don't see many scholars discussing HOW to achieve desegregation in such a way that no individual group can claim discrimination or unfair practice.

     As a result of the 2003 US Supreme Court rulings in the University of Michigan case, I developed Applications Quest,http://www.ApplicationsQuest.com
     Applications Quest is a data mining, software tool that provides holistic comparisons of applications in an effort to optimize holistic diversity.  As such, Applications Quest adheres to the US Supreme Court ruling and it provides a solution to all race-conscious admissions, school placement and any other diversity policies in a fair and equitable way that is easy to understand and use.  If you would like to learn more about Applications Quest, feel free to give me a call or send me email.  Applications Quest is a solution to these issues.
-Juan E. Gilbert

Auburn, AL 
Voluntary Integration Cases
For a discussion of the Parents Involved and Meredith cases as well as a prediction regarding the Supreme Court's decisions concerning the constitutionality of the cases, please see my forthcoming article, which is available at http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1787 

Eboni Nelson
Assistant Professor
Thurgood Marshall School of Law
Houston, TX 




© Copyright 2005 by DiverseEducation.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2020
March 2018
August 2017
February 2017
October 2016
July 2016
June 2016
April 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager