MSU Listserv


MSUNAG Archives

MSUNAG Archives


MSUNAG@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG  June 2006

MSUNAG June 2006

Subject:

Re: Backup Devices/Media

From:

"First, Tim" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

First, Tim

Date:

Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:44:13 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (174 lines)

I believe with the Dell boxes (they're all made by ADIC, at least the
library's are) you can just replace the interface card to switch from
SCSI to Fiber Channel.  That card is not cheap at all, but I believe you
can do a replacement.  I'm not 100% on that for the ML6000's, but I know
the 136T can be converted after purchase.  We currently start our
backups at 9PM and are finishing around 7AM.  With the growth we've
already seen and the amount we're anticipating we're adding the second
library to help us keep up.

As a generality we don't use the higher end support options from Dell.
Most of our servers have bronze support (Next Business Day) with us
having a spare server onsite that we can steal parts from if necessary.
On critical servers we usually put Silver support on them, which gives
you 7x24 4-hour response.  With tape library's, we actually use gold
support.  The library going down has too much potential for major
disaster.  As a result we go with higher end maintenance.

On the 136T we have moved our maintenance to Service Express, and
actually have replacement parts sitting on the shelf onsite.  We do this
just because we know that the picker will be getting replaced every
couple of months.  

While I understand your reasoning behind getting tapes through
University Stores, we have learned that when you have problems there
tends to be a desire by the support folks to blame the tape.  To combat
this, we've been buying the tapes directly from Dell.  Their pricing has
been very competitive and it totally gets you out of the blame game as
to who caused a problem.

-tim

________________________________
Timothy D. First, MCSE
Information Technologist III
 
Michigan State University 
Administrative Information Services 
 
[log in to unmask] 
(517) 353-4420 x335 
Fax: (517) 355-5176 

-----Original Message-----
From: Al Bray [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 3:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] Backup Devices/Media

Hey Tim,

Thanks for the feedback on the Dell ML6000 line.  I had looked at the
Dell tape libraries through the link via the MSU Computer Store Premier
Pricing when I initially started looking for a replacement library.  But
the ML6000 stuff is kind of buried out there and all I was seeing at the
time was the 136T and 132T systems.  Actually looking today, still have
to drill down.  I should have known Dell had a product line similar to
the Quantum PX500 line.

The ML6010 is more in-line with what I was looking for as far as feature
set and the pricing/performance specs are as good if not a little better
than the Quantum PX502 (especially if you consider that with the DELL,
our price includes the 3 Year BASIC hardware warranty).  

I also like their modular approach for possible future growth on the
ML6000 line.  But to be honest...the base 36 slots is probably way more
than we will need before the product lives out it's life cycle for us.

Only thing that the Quantum line had was that you could buy their PX50X
stuff with the Ultra 160 LVD SCSI drive /interface and then install a
fibre bridge option when ready to move it over to a fibre network.
There were some advantages to this configuration like lower cost drives
and flexibility to start out with it working over the LAN and being able
to move it over to the FC network without a total reinvestment. But also
I wondered about the performance one would give up bridging instead of
using native FC.  As far as I can see with the Dell ML6000, you choose
wither LVD SCSI or FC configuration from the get go.  Of course I
haven't called Dell yet to confirm this. 

Anyway...thanks for bringing the PowerVault ML6000 line to my attention.
Definitely worth a look and since your seeing impressive performance
with the big brother of this line in your test environment, that is good
to know.

On a side note, another reason I was asking how prevalent the LTO-3
drives were on campus is because I am going to talk to Stores and see
what they can start stocking the LTO-3 tapes.  When we moved from DAT to
DLT, we got them to stock the tapes.  Over the years that worked out
well because they could buy them in quantity and pass on the savings and
ordering them  from Stores was a lot less hassle (even with open orders
and the procurement cards available).  I want to approach them about
doing the same with the LTO-3 tapes but haven't a clue how many people
are using the LTO-3 stuff here on campus.

Again, thanks for your feedback Tim.

- Al






   
-- 

===============================
Al Bray
Systems Analyst
University Services
Michigan State University
Phone: 517-355-0357 Ext. 161
Fax: 517-353-2024
email: [log in to unmask] 

>>> On 6/8/2006 at 1:33 pm, in message
<[log in to unmask]>,
"First, Tim"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> We're using a Dell Powervault 136T Library with five LTO-2 drives in
it.
> It has been performing pretty well, but we wear the picker out every
> couple of months due to the number of tape mounts we do.  We just
> purchased a Dell ML6200 loaded with LTO-3 drives in it, which is
> actually an ADIC i500.  So far we're not running production on it yet,
> but our tests have shown drastic performance improvements and the
> hardware appears to be very impressive.
> 
> BTW, we have a handful of stand alone LTO-1 Drives and a two drive
> loader if anyone might be interested.  I'm not sure what the process
is,
> but if someone were interested in buying them from us, we can find out
> what that process has to be.
> 
> -tim
> 
> ________________________________
> Timothy D. First, MCSE
> Information Technologist III
>  
> Michigan State University 
> Administrative Information Services 
>  
> [log in to unmask] 
> (517) 353-4420 x335 
> Fax: (517) 355-5176 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Al Bray [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:06 PM
> To: [log in to unmask] 
> Subject: [MSUNAG] Backup Devices/Media
> 
> We are currently re-evaluating not only our backup software, but also
> the Library/Media we use as part of a   SAN implementation we are
> planning.
> 
> Currently we are using and older one drive Dell PowerVault 120 DLTIV
> (40/80gb) library that is barely cutting it today let alone when we
> acquire the SAN and want to move the backup traffic off our LAN and on
> to the Fibre Channel Network.
> 
> Currently I am looking at the Quantum 502 Tape Library with one LTO-3
> Ultrium drive (400/800gb) because it seems to have pretty good
features
> for the price point when compared to some of the others.
> 
> Just wondering how many people out there are using LTO-3
devices/media,
> what manufacturer you went with and how it's performing for you.
> 
> 
> Thanks for any feedback in advance.
> 
> - Al

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2023
June 2023
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
January 2019
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager