MSU Listserv


EQUITY Archives

EQUITY Archives


EQUITY@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

EQUITY Home

EQUITY Home

EQUITY  June 2006

EQUITY June 2006

Subject:

COMMISSION: M.C.R.I. FRAUD WAS STRATEGIC- Gongwer, MONDAY, JUNE 12 2006

From:

Rudy Redmond <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Retention & Graduation Issues Concerning Minorities in Higher Education <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:09:24 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (67 lines)

COMMISSION: M.C.R.I. FRAUD WAS STRATEGIC

The Michigan Civil Rights Commission charged Monday that the practices
of deceiving people, particularly African-Americans, into signed the
petition for the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative was a strategic move
made by the group pushing the ballot proposal.   

Commission Chair Mark Bernstein said in turning over the commission's
findings that, "We have provided a silver platter to the Attorney
General and Supreme Court to conduct an even more thorough
investigation.   This is about conduct (of the petitioners) not
content."

Individuals involved in the MCRI who attended the press conference in
Lansing (they were also held in Detroit and Grand Rapids) said that the
commission is prejudiced against the ballot proposal, calling it a
"Kangaroo Court," and that it was declaring the group guilty of fraud
when the courts, Department of State and Attorney General have already
declared the allegations to be untrue. 

But in conducting a five-month long set of hearings and analysis, the
commission concluded in its 16-page report that, "Two notable and
distressing truths emerge from the hundreds of pages of testimony
included in the report.   First, the instances of misrepresentation
regarding the content of the MCRI ballot language are not isolated or
random. Acts of misrepresentation occurred across the state, in multiple
locations in the same communities, and over long periods of time.  
Second, the impact of these acts of deception is substantial.   It
appears that the acts documented in the report represent a highly
coordinated, systematic strategy involving many circulators and, most
importantly, thousands of voters."

While the responsibility is there for both the person signing the
petition to understand what they are signing and for the circulator to
honestly tell the person what the petition involves, "A failure of the
first responsibility should not permit abrogation of the second.   The
conduct of MCRI to avoid false and misleading statements is of paramount
importance irrespective of all other events."

The commission heard testimony took testimony in oral or affidavit form
from hundreds of people, including several African-American people who
said they were told the petition was to support affirmative action, so
they signed it or helped circulate it. 

The commission is asking for some sort of reprieve for the aggrieved by
the Attorney General or Supreme Court, including having the court
reconsider the leave of appeal it filed in dealing with Michigan Civil
Rights Initiative v. Board of State Canvassers.  The group is also
asking that the Legislature implement preventative laws so that this
situation does not happen in the future. 

Nate Bailey with the Attorney General's Office said that they received
the commission's report and are reviewing it.   He did not know of any
precedent for the report to bring about a revocation of the initiative
from the ballot, as did Harold Core, spokesperson for the Department of
Civil Rights. 

Officials with the MCRI have repeatedly said their petition gatherers
did not use fraudulent tactics to gain signatures, and have criticized
the commission as a politically biased organization.

ENDORSEMENTS: A coalition of chambers of commerce in Grand Rapids,
Muskegon, Holland and Grand Haven has come out opposed to the MCRI,
according to One United Michigan.

Meanwhile, Gregory Creswell, the Libertarian candidate for governor,
has announced he is supporting the MCRI.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2020
March 2018
August 2017
February 2017
October 2016
July 2016
June 2016
April 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager