MSU Listserv


MSUNAG Archives

MSUNAG Archives


MSUNAG@LIST.MSU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV at MSU

LISTSERV at MSU

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG Home

MSUNAG  January 2006

MSUNAG January 2006

Subject:

Re: New web site comments

From:

"Byers, Sharon" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Byers, Sharon

Date:

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:14:21 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (169 lines)

Let's not pick on any one department for being less than perfect with
user control over font size, and I apologize for appearing to do so.  My
own site also locks the font unless the user turns on accessibility.  In
fact of the half dozen MSU departmental sites I just looked at randomly,
only one seems to scale the font correctly using the IE font size
setting. It's still a learning process for most of us. 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Gorentz [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] New web site comments

At 01:44 PM 1/18/2006, Chris Wolf wrote:
>I realize the following doesn't fully solve the problem you and John 
>are having, but...
>
>1) MSU's new home page generally follows better design practices than 
>the other ones you are having trouble with. Specifically regarding font

>sizes, the registrar's site has font sizes specified in absolute 
>measurements (pixels in this case), which to a great extent reduces the

>user's control over their view of the page. Most designers feel that 
>it's better to use relative font sizes because it gives more control to

>the user. MSU's new home page uses relative sizes. So my view is that 
>the registrar's site is more to blame than MSU's new site for the fact 
>that you have to change your browser settings. Again, I realize this 
>just gives you a different target for blame, without solving your
problem.

Agreed.  The web team has done a good thing by not using absolute font
sizes.  That sort of behavior is to be encouraged.   I still wish they
would make their font sizes a little larger than they have done.    (Do
there really exist people who can read those teensy fonts in the
lefthand submenus?  Well, I can read them for a few seconds, but it's a
painful experience.)  


>2) If it's an option for you, consider using Firefox or Netscape 
>instead of IE. They (and some other browsers such as Opera) have a true
"text zoom"
>feature which gives better font resizing on almost any web page without

>having to change your browser settings the way you have to in IE. I 
>would be really surprised if IE 7 doesn't include a comparable feature,

>so another option would be to wait for it to come out.

Last time I used Firefox the font size controls weren't all that great
compared to what I've used on Opera.  I've been thinking of giving it
another try to see what's been done, lately, and also to see if it lets
me override the fixed line heights that so many webs are using these
days.  (Thankfully, MSU's has not gone down that road.)   IE6 doesn't
have an override for that.

I'd be glad to go off bicycle touring and have nothing to do  with the
web until IE7 comes out, but unfortunately my family and employer expect
me to get work done in the meantime, which means I have to do something
in order to use the web.    I'll probably have to go back to putting
Opera on my computers again.   

Maybe someday there will be better column handling features, too.  I'm
hoping that would do away with the problem that I originally reported.  

John Gorentz



>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MSU Network Administrators Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
>> On Behalf Of Byers, Sharon
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:26 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] New web site comments
>> 
>> The problem is that changing the text size from the View menu doesn't

>> work on all websites, for example our current RO website, whereas the

>> Accessibility method does.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wolf, Chris [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:12 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] New web site comments
>> 
>> The warning about obsolete browsers does not refer to IE6; it's 
>> talking about much older versions.  Although IE6 has a few minor CSS 
>> bugs, its support of CSS is generally very good.
>> 
>> When you're viewing CSS pages, the "ignore font sizes..." may not be 
>> the best method for getting larger fonts on the screen. Have you 
>> tried leaving the "ignore font sizes"
>> unchecked and using View, Text Size to make the text larger? 
>> This method works on both the old and new MSU pages.
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: MSU Network Administrators Group
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>> 
>> > Behalf Of Byers, Sharon
>> > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:48 AM
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: Re: [MSUNAG] New web site comments
>> > 
>> > I see this message in the status for the new website.  I
>> reported the
>> > same accessibility problem John mentions below, except that
>> I'm using
>> > SP2.  I hope this doesn't mean we're just out of luck!
>> > 
>> > "Because of problems with their support for cascading sytle sheets 
>> > (CSS), some obsolete web browsers may have cosmetic problems 
>> > displaying sites that use CSS, including MSU's new site. The 
>> > recommended solution is to upgrade to a current browser version."
>> > 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: John Gorentz [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:37 PM
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: [MSUNAG] New web site comments
>> > 
>> > I'm going to post some comments about MSU's new web site here.  I'd

>> > use the on-line form for providing feedback, but that form
>> insists on
>> > my providing a ranking of a whole bunch of things before
>> it'll let me
>> > submit my comments.  I hardly ever participate in doing rankings on
>> > surveys like that.   They're not going to provide the 
>> recipients with
>> > useful information, so why should I waste my time on them?   
>> > It hurts my
>> > head to try to squeeze my opinions into a 1-5 ranking.   And 
>> > besides, I
>> > didn't even have opinions on all the items that form asks about.  
>> > 
>> > My comment is based on a look at the home page only.   The 
>> > following is
>> > what I tried to submit before I saw that the form wasn't going to
>> > cooperate:
>> > 
>> > I don't think users with visual difficulties are going to
>> like the way
>> 
>> > the menu on the left overlaps the text.  I use
>> > IE6 SP1 with the accessibility feature, "Ignore font
>> sizes...".  I use
>> 
>> > this option because most web pages use fonts that are too small for
>> > comfort.   I've
>> > taken a screen shot of the results and have put it on my
>> personal web
>> > site for you to look at.  It's at
>> > http://www.johngorentz.com/pix/msupage.jpg
>> > 
>> > There were no such problems with the old web page.   
>> > 
>> > I like the color scheme on the old one better, too.   After 
>> all, it's
>> > supposed to be "Go Green! Go White!", not "Go Green! Go Grey!"
>> > 
>> > John Gorentz
>> > W.K. Kellogg Biological Station
>> > 
>> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2023
June 2023
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
January 2019
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager