Content-Type: text/html ABSTRACT "BOOKS ARE WEAPONS": Books In Twentieth Century Presidential Campaigns Priscilla Coit Murphy School of Journalism and Mass Communication University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill The use of books as campaign material has rarely been noted, let alone studied, yet almost all of our twentieth century presidents have books to their credit. This paper examines how books by candidates in three clusters of presidential elections were used as part of their campaign effort in the pre-broadcast era, the radio era, and the television era. The study assesses the role of books in the candidates' communication to the electorate, whether as direct communication of the candidates' views or as evidence of their character. The number and kind of books is noted for each era, along with evidence of awareness of their political function. Changes in use and style across the three periods is discussed, and suggestions about the relationship of the books to the other media are noted. The analysis concludes with perceptions about possible trends continuing to the present time and suggestions for further study. ABSTRACT "BOOKS ARE WEAPONS": Books In Twentieth Century Presidential Campaigns Priscilla Coit Murphy School of Journalism and Mass Communication University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill How books by presidential candidates were used as part of campaign efforts in the pre-broadcast era, the radio era, and the television era. An assessment of the role of books in the candidates' communication to the electorate, whether as direct communication of the candidates' views or as evidence of their character. The number and kind of books is noted for each era, along with evidence of awareness of their political function. Changes in use and style, and suggestions about the relationship of the books to the other media are noted. Price Competition "BOOKS ARE WEAPONS": BOOKS IN Twentieth-Century Presidential Campaigns "Would that mine adversary had written a book" ~ Job 31:35 Priscilla Coit Murphy Doctoral Student University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Journalism and Mass Communication Paper submitted to the History Division AEJMC National Convention August 9-12, 1995 Price Competition "BOOKS ARE WEAPONS": BOOKS IN Twentieth-Century Presidential Campaigns Introduction In the history of presidential campaigns, candidates have used virtually all media at their disposal to put themselves before the American public. Much has been said and written about the relationship between the candidates and "the press" or "the media," particularly in the age of the sound bite and the photo opportunity. But what about books from a candidate? The quotation in the title of this study is from Franklin Delano Roosevelt,[1] one of the twentieth century's masters of public communication and author of several books, not only before his election but during his tenure as president. Roosevelt was witnessing a belief that books served a powerful communicative function for him, in general and specifically in communication with his constituency. Many other candidates for the office apparently have held the same view, for the record shows many books written, published, and on occasion even discussed as part of the campaign effort. Books do not spring immediately to mind as an essential, or even an obviously effective, form of campaign communication, especially in the maturity of the broadcast age. Yet as recently as 1992 with Bill Clinton's Putting People First[2] -- notably, the first candidate's book to make election-month best-seller lists -- there is evidence that books have been felt to serve the purposes of many presidential candidates, even as broadcast media have come seemingly to dominate the political process. The purpose of this study is to examine that evidence for indications of the role books may have been felt to play in three clusters of campaigns. Of interest will be the kinds of purposes apparently being served by the books, evidence of awareness of that role by candidates or their observers, and suggestions that the advent of radio and television made a difference in quantity or quality of the books involved in candidates' campaigns. Previous Study on the Subject To date, no studies specifically on the subject of the use of books as campaign material appear to exist, not surprising given the paucity of material on the social history of books in the twentieth century. Most often the point is made passingly, but one or two writers have noted explicitly that books can and do constitute campaign material. In 1936, a reviewer at the New York Times described the traditional form of the candidates' book: The brave words spoken by Presidential candidates, even by those who aspire to be candidates, have a habit of drawing together to form a book. . . . The result is a compilation that, often with reason, can be presented as statement of the great one's political and social philosophy. There have been many such books, and a few of them have made history.[3] More recently, writing for the Freedom Forum about the quality of writing found among our presidents, John Maxwell Hamilton noted, If anything, books have become as indispensable to presidents as Air Force One. In the process of getting elected, they need an autobiography or perhaps a brief book on some public policy issue to show what decent, serious people they are. Later, they need a hefty presidential memoir to earn a little cash and at the same time to justify their administrations.[4] Methodology The intent of this study is to present a limited introductory survey to the subject, searching first for evidence of awareness that the books had a campaign-related function -- whether on the part of the authors or the readership -- and then looking at trends or changes in the purpose and type of books as the broadcast media evolved to become a major site of the political battle. Before examining the material, a comment about methodology is unavoidable, since the subject is quite broad given the number of aspirants to the presidency since the beginning of the Union (especially when the vice presidency is often seen as a stepping-stone) and the number of books involved. The primary limitation was that of time: within the twentieth century -- the "mass media" century -- three clusters of four elections each were chosen to represent the pre-broadcast era (1900, 1904, 1908, 1912), the radio era (1932, 1936, 1940, 1944), and the television era (1960, 1964, 1968, 1972) respectively. Within those clusters of elections, the works associated with the major candidates[5] were considered -- with certain pertinent variations as noted. Choosing the books to be discussed involved a number of considerations.[6] The focus of the study was on those books published in the year of the election itself; however, works by the candidates prior to the election were also considered as potentially part of the candidate's profile, especially when an incumbent was running for re-election.[7] Lists of candidates' works were compiled first from lists of book reviews[8] in popular literature for the twelve years encompassed by the four-election clusters, augmented with lists from library catalogues and profiles of the candidates in primary and secondary literature. The primary materials were three-fold. First were the candidates' books themselves, less for their text than for their genre and intent. Second were book reviews that evidenced consciousness of a book's role in a campaign. Third were what were called "campaign books"[9] of a political party -- typically the published record or "text-book" of the national party convention.[10] The candidates' books fell into three categories: 1. collected speeches and addresses already delivered personally or in another medium; 2. direct addresses to the readership written for the occasion, i.e., a manifesto of observations and/or beliefs; and 3. literary efforts for more-or-less non-political purposes, most commonly scholarly works. Further, the books served either or both of two functions in a campaign: as political communication directed at the readership-electorate, or as evidence of the "measure of the man,"[11] often used by others to demonstrate the candidate's qualities. The books chosen were all had the pertinent candidate listed as author. However, very often the books were the result of efforts by editors or compilers on the candidates' behalf; frequently an introduction by an editor or another political figure was a significant part of the book's importance. Moreover, suggestions that books by some authors like John Kennedy or Richard Nixon may have been ghostwritten persist in the political folklore. For the purposes of this study, however, the question of actual authorship was deemed irrelevant, since the books were presented to the public at large as having been written by the candidate. In light of these considerations about how books may have functioned, the study will now examine the three eras for evidence of awareness of the political purpose of the books. Moreover, patterns of constancy or change in both genre and purpose is noted. Further, to the extent that so limited a sample may provide some indication of the effect of the advent of broadcast media on the use of books, that effect is discussed. Following exploration of the candidates' books in the three clusters of elections, a discussion of the findings will be offered, with speculation about implications for further study and the future of books in political campaigns. The Pre-Broadcast Era The election of 1900 pitted incumbent William McKinley against Nebraska Democrat William Jennings Bryan. McKinley's running mate was Colonel Theodore Roosevelt, who became president after McKinley died in 1901.[12] Bryan had published only a personal account of the campaign of 1896.[13] In the campaign he apparently relied more on his ability as an orator than as a writer, for Bryan appears to have published nothing expressly timed for the 1900 election. As a congressman, McKinley had published a compilation of speeches given up to 1893[14] and a similar volume in 1896.[15] In 1900 another collection of his speeches was published, which resembled its predecessors except insofar as the speeches were now those of McKinley the president, making the volume in effect a state archive more than political communication per se.[16] Between the 1900 election and that of 1904, however, McKinley's death put one of the most prolific writers of all American presidents into the White House; and the Republican party was to celebrate Roosevelt's scholarship in balance to his image as a statesman and outdoorsman. As Outlook magazine crowed, "Not since the Presidency of Thomas Jefferson has a man of letters been the executive head of the United States Government. The present President is a Harvard graduate, and represents the active rather than the contemplative side of Harvard culture."[17] By the time Roosevelt took office in 1901, he had produced close to twenty books[18] of diverse nature, from books about the outdoor life to scholarly works, including his authoritative history of the War of 1812[19] and his critically acclaimed five-volume Winning of the West.[20] While in office, he had continued to write.[21] The Republican Campaign Text-Book for the 1904 convention featured a biography of Roosevelt including a lengthy paragraph listing his publications in detail as evidence that "his work as a student of books, meanwhile, never dropped, even while he was most busily engaged in the affairs of current politics or in frontier activity."[22] Once again, his works collectively served to demonstrate the intellectual measure of the man Roosevelt as well as his rough-and-ready personal style. Among his other works, Roosevelt had published The Strenuous Life [23] in 1900. This oft-quoted collection of essays and addresses preached the "doctrine of the strenuous life"[24]; and its exhortative tone was indicative of his public style. It was reissued frequently, including in 1904. In the context of a campaign, such a volume accomplished both as direct communication by the candidate and as evidence of the candidate's style and character. This dual-function efficiency made such books attractive means of presenting a candidate to the electorate, whether or not at the direct instigation of the author-candidate himself. Similarly efficient in effect, Roosevelt's volume of Addresses and Presidential Messages[25] was produced in time for the 1904 election.[26] In Henry Cabot Lodge's introduction, he presented its value to the reader as more than historic record: "At the present moment [these speeches] have the peculiar and most important interest of being the utterances of a man who has not only filled the highest place in the gift of the American people, but who now stands before that people for their direct approbation and for re-election to office."[27] He went on, in similar vein to the Campaign Text-Book, characterizing Roosevelt as a man of letters as well as thought and action. In the introduction, Lodge also bemoaned (perhaps prematurely) the disappearance of the campaign biography[28] because of the "habit of 'writing people up' in the newspapers." He then applauded the opportunity for Roosevelt to put himself before the people in his own words, rather than limiting information to "all the incidents, both real and imaginary, in the career of a Presidential candidate now [in] the daily newspapers."[29] While such direct reference to other media was rarely found in the course of this study, the suggestion that books may afford a means of getting around the limitations of other media is noteworthy. On his election in 1904, Roosevelt had promised not to seek reelection again in 1908. The Republicans chose William Howard Taft to run against William Jennings Bryan, back for a second try for the presidency in 1908. Bryan's political career was based in his legendary oratorical talents. For the 1908 election, a collection subtitled "Extracts from the Speeches and Writings of 'A Well-Rounded Man'" was published under his authorship, though in fact the book was the editorial effort of its "compiler," Richard L. Metcalfe, who inserted adulatory notes from other authors among the excerpted addresses and writings of Bryan. Metcalfe's hope was that "through the perusal of this little volume, [readers] will know the 'Real Bryan' . . . even as he is known by every Nebraska neighbor who has had the advantage of intimate acquaintance with the man."[30] The idea was, apparently, to bridge the gaps in the press's presentation of Bryan to permit a personal interaction with those he had not spoken to in person. However, this effort at hardcover political communication may have backfired because of Bryan's personal style: the Republican Campaign Text-Book vilified Bryan as possessing the worst traits of the (dreaded) journalist, having "no power of analysis, no grasp of fundamental principles, no capacity for serious study, no sense of logical proportion"[31] -- by implication also the worst traits for a potential president. By contrast, Taft was described in an Outlook comment as having produced a book in which he exhibited "the traits which have made Mr. Taft the power that he is in America to-day -- [among others] . . . a judicial spirit, willing to hear both sides of a question . . . [and] a higher regard for substance than for form."[32] Again, the combined purpose of presentation of the man's character and his views was served in one book, Present Day Problems,[33] which was yet another collection of addresses, which the New York Times welcomed saying, "With Mr. Taft the Republican nominee for the Presidency, it is well that the public should have a compendium of his opinions on various topics of public interest."[34] Also likely current at the time of the election was Taft's Four Aspects of Civic Duty,[35] a collection of Yale lectures on civil responsibility. The three-way race in 1912 brought Roosevelt back as an independent, running against incumbent Taft and Democrat Woodrow Wilson. Teddy Roosevelt had been productive since leaving the presidency, traveling, speaking, and churning out books on such diverse subject as ethics, and hunting and travel,[36] as well as having three more compilations of his speeches produced with forewords by supporter Lyman Abbott.[37] In 1912, the election year, Realizable Ideals, a series of lectures, appeared, and The Real Roosevelt, an edited collection of his speeches was published listing Roosevelt as author, although not clearly at his behest. Even though both were anthologies, the titles suggested that the reader might find explication of the president's views in the first and some revelation of his personality (in the same vein as The Real Bryan) in the second. Meanwhile, a volume of Taft's Presidential Addresses and State Papers from March 4, 1909 to March 4, 1910[38] had been published in 1910, which volume the New York Times concluded would leave a favorable impression on its undoubtedly numerous readers,[39] although the Times did not specify whether it saw the volume as archival or pertinent to Taft's bid for reelection. Like Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson brought with him to the candidacy an established reputation as an author, although in Wilson's case it was primarily that of a scholar.[40] Beyond his authoritative History of the American People,[41] his most relevant political works to date had been one collection of lectures on U. S. congressional government in 1885[42] and another on constitutional government published in 1908,[43] which had prompted a Nation reviewer of 1910 to observe that it was "a refreshing advent of a scholar in politics who knows books but who also knows men and government."[44] However, Wilson published nothing specifically for the occasion of the 1912 election, and the Democratic Campaign Book for the 1912 convention, although having many pages in praise of Wilson's record as a scholar and Princeton president, did not list any of Wilson's works.[45] By contrast, the adversarial Republican Campaign Text-Book for that year found ample use of their own for Wilson's writings. The several-paged attack asserted that "the real sentiments of the average men are more likely to be expressed as a result of their thoughtful study than their expressions at a moment when they are seeking popular support at the polls"[46] and that, therefore, a work such as Wilson's History of the American People represents his true and considered beliefs[47] -- many of which the Republican speaker clearly found highly objectionable. Quoting passages from his history to deplore Wilson's political alliances, and generally quarreling with many of Wilson's positions as presented in that and several other of his books, the Republican argument cited books by name and passages by page number. This case might well be described as another (like Bryan's) in which the weapons -- although never forged as such to begin with, since none appear to have been written or compiled specifically with the presidential campaign in mind -- were turned upon their creator. Over the four first presidential elections of the century, six candidates ran for the office in an era when campaigning meant making speeches in person, often traveling to do so, and finding whatever means were available to get one's ideas and plans into print. Roosevelt and Wilson were both authors irrespective of their political activities, and the sum of their literary works served to illustrate their intellectual prowess, seen at least in that era as desirable in a president. However, as noted, by far the most frequent type of book published on the occasion of a campaign was a compilation of speeches. The purpose may have been to familiarize the populace with the ideas or the man, or best of all, both. That a book might offer advantages over reliance on newspapers for public exposure is suggested by Lodge's comments about the "imaginary" events published by newspapers, as well as by the Republican convention speaker's suggestion that in books a candidate's thoughts are more thoroughly and truly revealed. Otherwise, not much evidence was found of express recognition that books were part of a candidate's campaign strategy, however the party campaign books offer some intriguing insight on the point. All four of the Republican campaign books begin with a foreword stating explicitly: "The purpose of this book is to furnish in concise and convenient form for reference such information as is likely to be required by speakers, writers and others participating in the discussions of the presidential campaign. The intelligent American voter demands facts in support of the propositions upon which his vote is asked, and properly so."[48] So early an identification of their audience as, in effect, gatekeepers and/or opinion leaders is startling, and one could wish for similarly explicit description of the target audience for the candidates' works at the time. The Democrats were less explicit about the purpose of their campaign book, but on the inside cover of the 1908 book was what amounted to a display ad announcing a price of twenty-five cents for the book itself, where to write for it, and the recommendation that "Every Democrat Should Have It."[49] If a book can carry the party's message to the people, by extension it can carry the candidate to the people as well. If explicit consciousness of that purpose in campaign-year publishing is rarely evident, it may be in part because the purpose seemed obvious, especially to a nation used to print media only. As to the style of the works of this era, one often notes a hortatory, frequently moralizing tone. That tone is, of course, partly attributable to the fact that many of the works were collections of speeches; but both speeches and works written for print tended toward exhortation in fairly formal terms, reminiscent of religious or moralizing tracts of the era. The following passage from Roosevelt's Strenuous Life illustrates the rhetorical style of the day; moreover, it will provide an intriguing comparison with passages on a comparable theme in each of the two later eras to be discussed: I wish to preach not the doctrine of ignoble ease, but the doctrine of the strenuous life, the life of toil and effort, of labor and strife; to preach that the highest form of success which comes, not to the man who desires mere easy peace, but to the man who does not shrink from danger, from hardship, or from bitter toil, and who out of these wins the splendid ultimate triumph.[50] The Radio Era By the election of 1932, radio was firmly entrenched as a national medium. The Democrats nominated Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who was to use radio as no other president would, to run against Republican incumbent Herbert Hoover. Hoover had published a philosophical tract called American Individualism a decade earlier, focusing on the concept of "individualism" as the preferred antithesis to "socialism." Otherwise, he published no books while in office nor anything specifically aimed at the 1932 election. Although Roosevelt was well-educated and a writer, the 1932 Democratic campaign-book biography of Roosevelt downplayed his intellectual pursuits, emphasizing heavily his physical health, strength, and energy, undoubtedly to allay concerns about his residual paralysis from polio.[51] Moreover, no books were listed to his credit until the year of the 1932 election, when he published Government Not Politics,[52] a collection of articles, some of which had been published in magazines. A New York Times reviewer predicted that "the householder, the farmer, the laborer, the artisan, the business man who is not in the 'captain-of-industry' class, women, social workers and tariff reformers" would enjoy "these maxims on public affairs from the pen of a candidate for the Presidency," which could "be taken as the program of Governor Roosevelt." [53] Though probably not disagreeing with this identification of the non-opinion-leader audience, a Boston reviewer found the book "disappointing as a revelation of his stand on the leading questions of the day and quite toothless and harmless as a campaign document."[54] In spring of 1933, newly inaugurated President Roosevelt conducted his first radio broadcast in the series of "Fireside Chats." The same year he published Looking Forward,[55] a compilation of earlier writings and speeches edited by Roosevelt himself and operating as a sort of hard-cover national pep talk. His writing style, more intimate -- using pronouns of "you" and "I" -- than that in his first book, was the same personalized style used in his radio addresses, which Walter Lippmann characterized as "very unliterary," labeling it "public talk."[56] Roosevelt introduced his own book in the following terms: "In this comment I outline my basic conception [of the new terms of the old social contract], with the confidence that you will follow the action of your new national administration, understanding that its aim and objects are yours and that our responsibility is mutual."[57] The following year he wrote and edited a similar, follow-up book, On Our Way,[58] tracking the progress and philosophy of the New Deal. Thereafter, only collections of Roosevelt's addresses -- which included the "Fireside Chats" -- appeared, albeit in three different and quite extensive collections.[59] The 1936 election brought Republican Alf Landon into the race. The lengthy subtitle of this small and quite portable tome called America at the Crossroads, reads: "Alfred M. Landon's Program for American Government. His Interpretation of the Political, Economic and Social Principles of the Republican Party."[60] His New York Times reviewer, Francis Brown (quoted above, p. 2) placed the work in the tradition of compilations of the words of presidential candidates and provided some sense of the timing and intent of the book: "Since the Governor is still somewhat of an unknown quantity, it may be that his advisers though it best to rush this expression of his political thought to the country before election day. Ordinarily fuller exposition of the candidate's philosophy would be expected in the closing weeks of the campaign, but possibly all has been said that is to be said, except on specific issues."[61] And he quibbled with Sen. Capper's prediction that "history will judge these utterances as one of the most important documents of the times."[62] Brown's description of this book places it more in the category of manifesto than revelatory of Landon's character, although Capper's introduction was undoubtedly intended to present both Landon's words and the man himself. The campaign of 1940 appears to have involved no publications from Roosevelt,[63] other than Random House's continuing multivolume archival collection of his writings and speeches (noted above). Meanwhile the radio addresses, included in the collections, continued. No books were found listing his challenger, Wendell Wilkie, as author. In 1944 a collection of Roosevelt's speeches and writings was edited by labor figure J. B. S. Hardman, with its title drawn from one of the more famous of Roosevelt's addresses, Rendezvous with Destiny.[64] In his introduction to this "single handy volume," Hardman expressed "the thought and the hope of the editor, that the selections may prove to be of assistance to the citizen who realizes his vital concern with national policy but lacks two essential conditions of basic study: much leisure time and a rich library at hand."[65] Thus, again in "convenient form" for the voters, this book, too, straddled the line between archival tome and manifesto. Roosevelt's 1944 opponent Thomas E. Dewey published nothing for the year's election, but a collection of Dewey's speeches arguing with the Roosevelt regime in the 1940 election, The Case Against the New Deal,[66] fell well over the line into the realm of tract. Although it is possible his 1940 work was still in print and circulation, apparently Dewey declined to make his case again in a new work for the 1944 election. Over the four elections in question here, four candidates ran unsuccessfully against a powerful communicator. Compared to the pre-broadcast era, books appeared to play a somewhat lesser role in the radio era. The books that did appear were, once again, most often collections of speeches and addresses. Many explanations for what seems to be a somewhat reduced reliance on books suggest themselves, only one of which would be that radio might now have become more significant in candidates' efforts to reach the electorate. Other considerations would certainly include the Depression and the war, affecting the availability of materials and money for books, not to mention the focus of the working nation. Yet book publishing in general did not suffer during these years, even if the content of what was published may have changed. Roosevelt's "Books Are Weapons" slogan was in fact part of a campaign supporting the role of education and libraries in the war effort. [67] The dominance of Roosevelt, both as incumbent and as charismatic personality in difficult times, may also have something to do with the lack of books from his challengers, whose books -- when they appeared -- were more political arguments than self-presentations. Roosevelt himself had begun in his first term with efforts to reach his nation directly through fairly personal books, even if they were presentations of his program; but he did not do so again. Certainly he was busy, and books take time that an incumbent may not have or may not feel he needs to take in a campaign for reelection. But the "bully pulpit" was critical to Roosevelt's presidency, and radio reemerges as significantly his choice of medium, even if he felt the need to archive his broadcast words in the multivolume written collections. Would the advent of television, an even more powerful medium, mean the complete elimination of books from the campaign front? And what of the style of these books? One detects subtle change, as seen in the less formal approach now referring to "you" and "us," and attested to by the change in titles. From the "Speeches and Addresses" format there was a shift toward the more personal and perhaps even casual, "Looking Forward," "On Our Way," and so on. The inclusive tone in an excerpt from On Our Way can be compared with Teddy Roosevelt's words on the "Strenuous Life," quoted above: Faith in America, faith in our tradition of personal responsibility, faith in our institutions, faith in ourselves, demands that we recognize the new terms of the old social contract. In this comment I outline my basic conception of these terms, with the confidence that you will follow the action of your new national administration, understanding that its aims and objects are yours and that our responsibility is mutual.[68] The Television Age In 1960, incumbent Dwight Eisenhower's vice president, Richard Nixon, met Democratic newcomer Senator John Kennedy. Before 1960 Kennedy had two books to his credit, Why England Slept -- an adaptation of his senior thesis at Harvard on pre-war England -- and the Pulitzer-prize-winning Profiles in Courage,[69] a collection of portraits of people whose valor and will Kennedy admired. The books were featured in the campaign documentary on Kennedy shown at the convention. Why England Slept was intended to demonstrate foreign policy expertise comparable to Nixon's on-the-job training as vice president; and the suggestion that Kennedy himself might be a "profile in courage" underlay accounts of his Navy career and his battles with a back injury.[70] Thus Kennedy was presented to the voters as a man of scholarly attainment, as Wilson had been. Furthermore, his subject matter was turned not only to reflect positively on the man's character but to augment his political credentials as presented to the electorate. For the 1960 campaign, both Kennedy and Nixon produced books of their collected speeches. Kennedy's The Strategy of Peace[71] appeared before the convention. It was edited and introduced by historian Allan Nevins and comprised several of the senator's speeches on foreign policy. One reviewer saw the objective of the book as being "to arouse Americans to 'a more strenuous and idealistic policy'" but identified it as "a campaign piece [whose] historical significance will be tied to the author's future political fortunes."[72] But CBS News correspondent Blair Clark felt there was good reason to be interested in the book: "There is even some urgency about it, for this is the man who, it can be said, may well be on the Democrats' half of the national ballot in November." Intriguingly, Clark was explicitly looking at the book's author from the point of view of "live" (or television) delivery, making the point that, as polished as these speeches may have been in print, Kennedy's personal delivery style was such that one would expect an engaged live audience as well: "whether in the Senate . . . or at a banquet, these speeches have class and style." Clark concludes, "This collection suggests by its responsible tone that the Senate of the United States is a good training ground for the highest office."[73] Richard Nixon's The Challenges We Face[74] appeared in early summer of 1960 and included material (edited by two McGraw-Hill editors) from his speeches and papers as vice president, including an account of his "kitchen debate" with Krushchev. "Of interest to pro, con, and undecided voters," was the dry opinion of one reviewer.[75] But supporter Victor Lasky's review characterized the book as an answer to accusations that Nixon was a fence-straddler who need to tell the people where he stood: Assuming he is not caught flagrante delicto between now and [the Republican convention], Richard M. Nixon appears destined to be the Grand Old Party's nominee for President this year. . . . He has produced a sharp, timely, and substantial reply [to the accusations]. . . . His book does present clearly and in depth the views of a Presidential aspirant who, in a remarkable political rise, has yet to lose an election.[76] He concluded saying, "this book is an indication of the high-level approach that Mr. Nixon intends to take during the campaign. If his Democratic opponent . . . follows suit, then the American people will at long last be able to decide on issues, not personalities." [77] Lasky may have overplayed the book's significance, of course, and indeed it was little more than a heavily edited collection of speech excerpts, reorganized thematically by the editor, rather in the old style of the pre-broadcast era. Following Kennedy's assassination, Lyndon Johnson became president in late 1963, just a year before the next election.[78] Shortly after taking office, Johnson authorized publication of a collection of his speeches and writings since becoming Senate Democratic leader in 1953, apparently to introduce himself and his views to the bereft nation. In the introduction to A Time for Action,[79] Adlai Stevenson quoted "our new President" in several passages from the subsequent text to augment them with elaborating insights: "While these speeches reveal something of his views on the great public issues of recent times, they necessarily disclose little of his extraordinary managerial skill and political pragmatism." Stevenson evidently found the book, which appeared in mid-1964, wanting in its presentation of Johnson, limited to the single function of presentation of views; and he sought to present something of Johnson-the-man himself. Later in 1964, however, Johnson published another book, this time much more personal in style. My Hope for America[80] seems quite likely to have been culled from utterances elsewhere, but it was presented as a thematic arrangement of short philosophical and ideologic observations. Here, the traditional combined function of candidate-and-views was better served. Further, its timing and explicit purpose as a campaign document were made obvious by reviewer Henry Brandon, who said, "Although the president was well behind Senator Goldwater in putting his philosophy between book covers, a paste-and-scissor job has now been ru shed into print."[81] Senator Barry Goldwater, Johnson's Republican opponent in 1964, had reached the best-seller lists in 1960 with his book, The Conscience of a Conservative, which he had followed up with Why Not Victory? A Fresh Look at American Foreign Policy[82] -- both books firmly in the tradition of political manifesto but exceptionally personal in style. The book Goldwater produced for the 1964 election was Where I Stand,[83] another paperback collection of speeches. Roscoe Drummond listed four good reasons for reading it: If you have already decided to vote for him, his latest book will undoubtedly fortify your convictions. If you have already decided to vote against him, his book will undoubtedly give you additional reasons. If you have not made up your mind, Where I Stand will help you do so. If Mr. Goldwater is to be the next President of the United States, we all should have as clear an idea as possible as to where he is headed.[84] Although succinctly stating the voters' stake in having manifesto-style books as part of the campaign effort, Drummond felt Goldwater's book fell short: "The Republican nominee's book raises as many questions as it answers. . . .What we really need is another book by Mr. Goldwater -- not just Where I Stand, but What I Would Do and How I Would Do It."[85] The extraordinary election year of 1968 brought another refusal of the incumbent to run again and the political resurrection of Richard Nixon. Johnson's decision left the Democrats in something of a free-for-all that saw tragedy with Robert Kennedy's assassination[86] and a fragmented party in the tortured nomination of Johnson's vice president, Hubert Humphrey. In 1964, Humphrey had written two books that might have been part of the campaign, The Cause is Mankind and War on Poverty,[87] but Humphrey presented them more as his own personal statement of the liberal tradition begun under Kennedy and continued with Johnson[88] -- perhaps appropriately for a vice presidential candidate. The book Beyond Civil Rights: A New Day of Equality,[89] published in 1968, purportedly was of the same genre -- a rather personal manifesto. But a reviewer questioned the disingenuousness: "Mr. Humphrey denies that this is a campaign book, insists that it has been in the works since 1965. Be that as it may, the contents and the timing of this slim volume make it a self-serving political document, and it is likely to endure precisely as long as its author survives politically."[90] Richard Nixon, following his defeat in the presidential election of 1960 and the California gubernatorial election of 1962, had written the autobiographical Six Crises.[91] The book was reissued in October of 1968 with a new introduction citing the failures and problems of the Johnson-Humphrey administration and sporting a formal reproduction of Nixon's acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention two months earlier. In that form, the book represents a hybrid of type and purpose. Originally the book had not been written as either political tract or presentation of the self but rather as an historical memoir. In its reissued form, it combined polemic, self-revelation, and somewhat unprecedented self-adulation in the inclusion of the acceptance speech -- implying phoenix-like survival of the "six crises" of Nixon's political life. Moreover, the speed with which that book appeared marked a new era of rapid publication. Even faster was Nixon's publication of two "instant books," two paperback collections of addresses and comment, published privately by the Nixon-Agnew Campaign Committee within six days of accepting the nomination.[92] In the front matter to the second book, the committee said: "Together, these two volumes represent a publishing event unique in political history -- a fuller compilation of a candidate's current views than ever before presented to the public during a campaign"[93] -- something of an overstatement in light of what has already been seen in this study. When incumbent Nixon ran again in 1972, he apparently chose other means of promoting his candidacy than publishing books. No industry record can be found of more "instant books" like the two for the 1968 election.[94] Only another collection of his addresses, New Road for America, appeared as a semi-archival volume of his presidential "major policy statements" through the auspices of the Reader's Digest.[95] Before 1972 George McGovern, Nixon's Democratic opponent, had published three books, dealing respectively with the Food for Peace program, agricultural policy, and war and foreign policy.[96] Typically they offered an amalgam of McGovern's thoughts with excerpts from speeches while holding political office. The sole publication appearing in the 1972 campaign year was a most unlikely offering from a candidate. The Great Coalfield War[97] was a collaborative adaptation of McGovern's 1963 doctoral dissertation on the bloody 1914 Colorado battles over union recognition, and it provided insight into McGovern's political orientation as well as his scholarly ability. One reviewer took the customary tack that a book by a candidate should be read to give the voter insight into the man: "One of the authors may someday be President of the United States, and the book reveals, to some considerable degree, the careful, orderly, incisive, and sympathetic way in which he thinks and so the kind of President he might be."[98] Another referred to it as "the rarest sort of campaign document" in being the product of "the only Ph.D. in the Senate, not to mention the Presidential race." Placing it in the established tradition, he call it "as valuable and revealing a book as Presidential candidates have offered us recently -- more scholarly and more original that Kennedy's 'Profiles in Courage' and less narcissistic than Nixon's 'Six Crises,' even if it is less readable than either of those others." [99] Neither reviewer speculated about the audience for this book, however, which was probably much narrower than that for the books with which it was compared. In this era, we have looked at the election-year publications of six candidates and found them, again, serving both to communicate thought and to illustrate character, at the same time wherever possible. The scholarly nature of Theodore Roosevelt's and Wilson's works is echoed in Kennedy's and McGovern's works, but with less significance placed on the intrinsic value of the scholarship and what it says about the candidate's character, and more on its interaction with the man's political outlook. Goldwater's works are classic examples of the direct political manifesto, but again, they are more personal in tone than their pre-broadcast era forebears. Similarly, the collected speeches of Johnson and Nixon follow in the path of Franklin Roosevelt, in being mo unted as direct appeals for political -- and social -- mobilization behind their respective programs, as well as in being personal in tone. The trend is clearly toward the casual and personal, even more so than in the radio era -- from first-person titles like My Hope for America or Where I Stand, to the direct address of Humphrey's liberal musings, to the intimate self-portrait of Nixon's Six Crises. By way of final comparison with the excerpts from Teddy Roosevelt on the "Strenuous Life" and from his cousin in On Our Way, a passage from Six Crises suggests how much change in style has occurred, even taking into consideration differences in personality among the three presidents: What I have tried to do is describe my personal reactions to each [crisis] and then to distill out of my experience a few general principles on the "crisis syndrome." . . .We tend to think of some men as "born leaders." But I have found that leaders are subject to all the human frailties. They lose their tempers, become depressed, experience the other symptoms of stress. Sometimes even strong men will cry. [100] At least as significant as the change in style -- which reflects cultural change as much as change in political strategy -- is the fact that books have scarcely disappeared in the television era. It may be significant that Nixon -- a man not thought of as a great scholar but to whom television never seemed kind -- went on to author a continuing supply of books of views and analyses. In addition, Nixon's, Goldwater's, McGovern's and to a lesser extent, Humphrey's books also might have been seen as offering an outlet for their views where national coverage was felt to be abbreviated, otherwise inaccessible, or perhaps adversarial. No one approached the post-convention campaign trail without at least one book in print, even though the book might not always have appeared at the behest of the candidate himself. At the very least, television appears not to have dimmed interest in using books for campaign communication, though one might question whether two different audiences -- book-readers and television-watchers -- might be involved. But this era is the first in which some of the books involved had been best-sellers, albeit not in the immediately pre-election period. And increasingly the books were appearing in paperback form, notably Goldwater's and Nixon's -- particularly Nixon's "instant books." These points argue for an expectation of a larger audience than merely the well-read. Conclusion and Looking to the Future Thus, what has happened to the use of books in presidential elections since the pre-broadcast era? Books as a campaign phenomenon did not disappear, although they seemed to wane a bit in the early broadcast era (undoubtedly for a number of reasons). Rather, they seemed to gain new significance in the television era. Throughout the periods covered, however, they served remarkably consistent purposes, in rather similar forms, even as the context in which they appeared and their style changed. Indeed, the keys to an explanation may lie in the concurrent changes in technology and style. With the advent of the paperback, the technology of book publishing enabled quicker access in an even more "portable and convenient form" (to recall the wording of the campaign books), at more affordable prices, than ever before. The development of "instant books" offered even greater possibilities for reaching a national audience in less time than some magazine articles may take. Some of their advantage over newspapers -- affording an alternative to journalistic inaccuracies -- was noted by one pre-broadcast era reviewer, although acknowledgment of the fact that they can and do provide national "reach" could not be found in the literature. Their relationship to radio is suggested by the choice to reproduce not only the text but the style in Roosevelt's c ollections, and their relationship to television may also have something to do both with style and the possibility of offering an augmenting, if not alternative, medium through which to present the candidate to the people. For both Kennedy and Nixon, their books seem designed to present traits inadequately illuminated by the mercurial light of television. As noted, the style of these books became more informal and personal, even as they performed similar, and similarly combined, functions over the three periods studied -- as indeed our society became more casual and personal in style. Something about the potential intimacy of a book, its direct contact with an (ostensibly) undistracted reader, combined with the extended space available to develop concepts, impressions, or even self-revelations, may lend itself to a particular kind of political communication. The direct contact, moreover, allowed the campaigner to circumvent controls and limitations in the print, and later the broadcast, press. Further study of the relationship between books and other media in political communication is suggested, particularly in the tradition of the journalistic book. A consideration of the intended as well as actual audiences for these campaign-related books would add considerably to this admittedly limited study. Above all, continuation of the study into the most recent era would be intriguing, especially as instant publishing has become widely possible and the number of television channels and formats has multiplied. Over the course of his several campaigns, Ronald Reagan was the listed author of over twenty paperback compilations of quotations,[101] some of which were reported to have appeared with lightning speed. And what of the future -- what will happen as the electorate becomes less literary in how it receives information, particularly as electronic media promise to change our information systems forever? The tendency has been to discount books in the era of the photo-op and the sound bite. As Hamilton observed, "Nowadays, writing is the least effective tool of campaigning or governing. A book takes a long time to write and is read by relatively few people; a 10-second television sound bite can be arranged in an afternoon and is seen by millions."[102] Thus, one might conclude that the "lesson for a presidential contender is to forget about producing even a mediocre ghosted campaign volume."[103] But Esther B. Fein of the New York Times recently reported a surge of voter interest in books: "Behold the pre-election book buyers of 1992: Americans who are watching Presidential and Vice Presidential debates and registering to vote in record numbers are also buying masses of books about the programs of Presidential candidates, about the deficit and environmental problems, and about the way Government doesn't always work."[104] As she wrote, books by Bill Clinton and Ross Perot topped the paperback book lists, and Al Gore's book on the environment held a position on the trade hardback list.[105] However, she wrote, "not everyone agrees that this is a healthy trend. 'The good news is that people are buying political books,' said David Rosenthal, executive editor of the Random House adult trade division. 'The bad news is that these are the printed equivalent of sound bites. The information is written, packaged and printed in a way that is disturbingly similar to TV.'" [106] Though debatable in both instances, a similar comment might have been made about publication of Roosevelt's "Fireside Chats." But the point is worth making that there appears to be a felt use -- and an audience -- for these books, whatever their format. It remains to be seen whether they will continue to have a place in future presidential campaign arsenals. Notes [1] Franklin Delano Roosevelt, "'Books Are Weapons', Says Presiden t Roosevelt," Poster: Three messages from President Roosevelt about boo ks, printed for distribution by the Library Binding In stitute, 1942. [2] William Clinton, Putting People First (NY: Times Boo ks, 1992). [3] Francis Brown, "Mr. Landon States His Principles," review of Alfred M. Landon, America at the Crossroads, New Y ork Times (27 Sept. 1936), Book Review section, 5. [4] John Maxwell Hami lton, "Why Can't Mr. President Write?" Media Studies Journal 6, no. 2 (summer 1992), 140. His comments were the stimulus for t his study. [5] "Major" is defined as those commanding more than 20 perce nt of the final vote, in almost all cases being the tw o candidates of the major parties. [6] The simple issue of publication date is not, first of all, simple, since copyright dat es, publication, and release dates are not always the same. Books in exi stence before the election year may or may not still h ave been in print during the election year; prior to a tax decision in the early 1970s ("Thor Power Tool"), books could be kept in print and republished on a continuous on-demand ba sis almost indefinitely. Unless a publisher specifie d the publication of a new edition, determining whether a book published earlier might have seen a spurt in sales during an ele ction year would depend -- short of its appearance on a best-seller list -- on serendipitous mention in trad e publications. In general, however, the year of copyright and/or the ye ar in which a review appears were taken as the year a book appeared in the mass market. [7] See the "Selected Bibliography of Candidates' Books" following the text; books written between two elections are included in the list for the later election. [ 8] Use of book review lists had the methodological advantage of locating books taken "seriously" enough to be reviewed by at le ast three reviewers. However, the implicit bias of th ese sources is that they may concentrate on materials of interest to the more educated segments of the population, thus introducing an element o f redundancy -- i.e., writing for those who already ar e book-readers. Moreover, books are usually reviewed only in the year they are published, even if they became of more popular interest later on. Finally, not all books written are reviewed. Thus it was advisable to supplement the book review lists t o reach the final selection with additional materials, e.g. books mentioned in reviews of other books, books listed as being by the same author of a book, etc. [9] These books should not be confuse d with "campaign biographies," written by boosters or critics of a give n candidate explicitly as puffery, or debunking, for the purposes of the campaign. William Miles compiled a bibliography of th is genre (The Image Makers: A Bibliography of America n Presidential Campaign Biographies [Metuchen, N.J.: S carecrow, 1979]), which cites a useful, though odd and occasionally spott y, selection. Books like Theodore White's series on the "Making of the President" or McGinniss's Selling of the President 19 68 (NY: Trident, 1969) are strange bedfellows of the other sort of "campaign books" and, as noted in the literature review, mak e scarce reference to candidates' books in campaigns. [10] Republican National Committee, Republican Campaign Text-Books 1900 - 1912 (Phila.: Dunlap, 1900 - 1912), available on microfiche from the National Micropublishing Corp.; De mocratic National Committee, Campaign Books of the Democratic Party Candidates and Issues 1896-1936, (NY: Democratic National C ommittee, 1896 -- 1936), available on microfiche from the National Micropublishing Corp. (Later publication s out of party conventions took the form of publication of the platform agreed upon early in the convention, rather than a reco rd of the event itself.) [11] Unfortunately, there are no women represen ted in this group, hence the word "man" can be used in this study to refer to the persona of a candidate. [12] Works by vice p residential candidates are included in this study when they became president following the death of a president and went on to run for reelection in a subsequent, included election: i.e., Theodore Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson. [13] William J. Bryan, Th e First Battle (Chicago: Conkey, 1896). [14] Speeches and Addresses of William McKinley (Appleton, 1893), noted in review, Na tion 58 (8 Feb. 1894), 104. The reviewer wrote, "we may not unjustly reg ard this compilation as in its principal intent a Pres idential candidate's propitiation of his fellow-citize ns." [15] "McKinley's Masterpieces," listed without bibliographic infor mation in a 1896 Nation review, which described an unn amed book as "a little volume of 'McKinley's Masterpie ces'" in which McKinley's oratorical talents shone. Nation 62 (18 June 1 896), 466. [16] William McKinley, Speeches and Addresses of William Mc Kinley from March 1, 1887 to May 30, 1900 (NY: Doubleday & McClure, 190 0). [17] "The New President as a Literary Man," Outlook 69 (21 Sept. 190 1), 165. It is to be remembered that Outlook's board included many members of the Republican establishment, eventually including Roosevelt himself. [18] Outlook listed nineteen (O utlook 69 [21 Sept. 1901] 165), while Bookman listed t wenty titles as of 1901 (Bookman 2 [Dec. 1904], 292). There are differen ces between these lists, accountable in part to differ ences as to which pamphlets and monographs were consid ered books. [19] Theodore Roosevelt, The Naval War of 1812 (NY: Putnam' s, 1882), which saw several re-issues. [20] Theodore Roosevelt, Winning of the West (Putnam's, 1889) [21] According to Bookma n's list, he wrote on Oliver Cromwell and The Philippines, as well as miscellaneous collections of observations and maxims (Boo kman, 292) [22] Republican Campaign Text-Book 1904, 250. [23] Theodore Roosevelt, The Strenuous Life (NY: Century, 1900). [24] Ibid., 1. [25] Theodore Roosevelt, Addresses and Presidential Messages of Theodore Roos evelt (NY: Putnam's, 1904). [26] Roosevelt's Democratic opponent in 19 04 was Alton B. Parker. Parker was a judge with ties to Wall Street but no discernible record as a writer. Profiles of Parker at the time list no books attributed to him, nor are any reviews of books by him found. [27] Roosevelt, Addresses and Preside ntial Messages (1904), vi. [28] See note 9 above, regarding campaign bio graphies. [29] "Despite, therefore, the great extension of the interview and of the habit of 'writing people up' in the newspa pers, . . . the formal political or campaign biography . . . has of lat e largely disappeared. . . . It used to be the inevitable as well as the conventional practice to write and publish the lives o f Presidential candidates in more or less serious and elaborate books when the time for their election approached." Henry Ca bot Lodge, introduction to Roosevelt, Addresses and Messages, v. [30] W illiam Jennings Bryan, The Real Bryan, comp. Richard A. Metcalfe (Des Moi nes, IA: Personal Help, 1908), 7. [31] "[Bryan] has the mental alertne ss of the Western journalist, eager to exploit each new idea, without s topping to go to the bottom of it, and as ready to drop it and turn to something else. He has shown no power of analysis, no grasp of fundament al princip les, no capacity for serious study, no sense of logical proportion. In all his treatment of large public questions he is superficial, rhetorical, uncertain and untrustworthy." Republican Campaign Text-Book 1908, 270. [32] "Comment on Current Books," review of Taft, Present Day Problems, Outlook 89 (1 Aug. 1908), 766. [33] William Howard Taft, Pre sent Day Problems (NY: Dodd, Mead, 1908). [34] "Mr. Taft as His Own Inte rpreter," review of Taft, Present Day Problems, New York Times 12 (15 August 1908), 448. [35] William Howard Taft, Four Aspects of Civic Duty (NY: Scribner's, 1907). [36] Theodore Roosevelt, Applied Ethics (Cambrid ge, MA: Harvard Univ., 1911) AND HUNTING [37] Theodor e Roosevelt, The Real Roosevelt (NY: Putnam's, 1910); African and Europea n Addresses (NY: Putnam's, 1910); New Nationalism (NY: Outlook, 1911). [38] William Howard Taft, Presidential Addresses and St ate Papers from March 4, 1909 to March 4, 1910 (NY: Doubleday, 1910). [39] "Mr. Taft's Speeches," review of Taft, Presidential Addresses, New Y ork Times 15 (15 Nov. 1910), 620. [40] E.g., The Stat e (Boston: D. C. Heath, 1889); Mere Literature (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1896 and reissued in 1913); George Washington (NY: Ha rper & Bros., 1896). [41] Woodrow Wilson, A History of the American Peop le (NY: Harper & Bros., 1902). [42] Woodrow Wilson, Congressional Gover nment in the United States (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1885). [43] Woodrow Wilson, Constitutional Government in the United Stat es (NY: Columbia Univ., 1908). [44] Review of Wilson , Congressional Government, Nation 91 (22 Sept. 1910), 256. [45] Democra tic Campaign Book 1912, 49-62. [46] Republican Campaign Text-Book 1912, 256 . [47] The campaign book asserts it to be true of the history, even if written ten years earlier, before "the shadow of th e White House had not fallen athwart his peaceful path . The presidential bee had not yet begun to buzz." Conceding Wilson a br illiant reputation as author, the speaker said: "He ha s been a most prolific writer, exploring every corner and nook of the field of history, sociology and political economy. In hi s voluminous writings and public addresses every subject in which the A merican people have ever shown the slightest interest, with the possible exception of the question of race s uicide, has been treated by him in a manner which reflects great credit o n his intellectual courage and independence, if not up on his political foresight and acumen." Ibid. [48] Republican Campaign Text-Books 1900-1912. Further, the purpose is explicitly to present the material "in concise and portable form . . . for read y reference in the field, on the stump, upon the train , or wherever they may be desired." [49] Democratic Campaign Book 1908, inside cover. [50] T. Roosevelt, Strenuous Life, 1. [51] Democratic Cam paign Book 1932, 5-12. [52] Franklin D. Roosevelt, Government Not Politi cs (NY: Covici, 1932). [53] "Franklin D. Roosevelt Speaks," review of Ro osevelt, Government Not Politics, New York Times (7 Au g. 1932), Book Review section, 1. [54] Review of Roosevelt, Government N ot Politics, Boston Transcript (3 Aug, 1932), 3. [55] Franklin D. Roosev elt, Looking Forward (NY: John Day, 1933). [56] Walter Lippmann, "'On Ou r Way'--A Book Review," review of Roosevelt, On Our Way, New York Herald Tribune (20 Apr. 1934), 21. [57] Ibid., 14. [58] Fra nklin D. Roosevelt, On Our Way (NY: John Day, 1934). [59] Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt is a multivolume work featuring a special introduction and explanatory note by Roosevelt and was first published by Random House (NY) in 1940. Later other collections were produced by Macmillan a nd Funk. [60] Alfred M. Landon, America at the Crossroads (NY: Dodge, 19 36), with intro. by Senator Arthur Capper. [61] Brown , review of Landon, Crossroads, 1936, 5. [62] Arthur Capper, in introd uction to Landon, American at the Crossroads, vii. [63] Intriguingly, El eanor Roosevelt had begun to produce her own publications of personal experiences, impressions, and even collections of photogr aphs; and her name now appeared more frequently on boo k review lists than did her husband's. [64] Franklin D. Roosevelt, ed. J . B. S. Hardman, Rendezvous with Destiny (NY: Dryden, 1944). [65] J.B.S. Hardman, in introduction to Roosevelt, Rendezvous, vi i-viii. [66] Thomas E. Dewey, The Case Against the New Deal (NY: Harper & Bros., 1940). "In the national election of 1940 the American people will be called upon to make the most critical decision they have faced in eighty years," vii. [67] "People di e, but books never die . . . No man and no force can take from the world the books that embody man's eternal fight against tyra nny of every kind. In this war, we know, books are weapons. And it is a part of your dedication always to make them weapons for man's freedom. . . . In your charge is the living record of all that man has accomplished in the long labor of liberty, al l he aspires to make of it in the future we of the Uni ted Nations fight to secure. By keeping that record always before the eyes of the American people you give them renewed streng th in their struggle against the dark backwash of tyra nny, renewed faith in their unconquerable determinatio n to take their full part in establishing on this earth a new free age of man." Roosevelt, "Books Are Weapons." [68] F. Roose velt, On Our Way, 14. [69] John F. Kennedy, Why England Slept (NY: Funk, 1940), a revised version of his senior thesis at Harv ard, on best-seller lists briefly in 1940; Profiles in Courage (NY: Harper & Bros., 1956), also reached best-seller lists. [70 ] Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Packaging the Presidency: A History and Critici sm of Presidential Campaign Advertising (New York: Oxf ord, 1992), 162. She suggested why the books were included in the film : "While Nixon could and did recite the number of coun tries he had visited, the number of leaders he had met, the number of con ferences he had attended, none of these statistics dem onstrated that he had learned history's lessons. What Kennedy's books provided was the evidence that he had." Ibid. [71] Joh n F. Kennedy, The Strategy of Peace (NY: Harper & Bros., 1960). [72] Rev iew of Kennedy, Strategy, Library Journal 85 (15 Mar. 1960), 1129. [73] Blair Clark, "The Strategy of Peace," review of Kennedy, Strategy, Saturd ay Review 43 (28 May 1960), 19. [74] Richard Nixon, The Challenges We Face (NY: McGraw-Hill, 1960). [75] Review of Nixon, Challenges, in Bookl ist 56 (15 July 1960), 679. [76] Victor Lasky, in review of Nixon, Chall enges, Saturday Review 43 (2 July 1960), 15. [77] Ib id. Lasky also said: "These, therefore, are the views of the man to whom the American people may well entrust the leadership of the free world for years to come. They should be of particular interest to American liberals, many of whom--for reasons this reviewer finds difficult to comprehend--view with drea d the possibility of Mr. Nixon's occupying the White H ouse." [78] In 1962 Kennedy had published a selection of his public stat ements in his first year as president, including an el oquent introduction in the FDR tradition: "We have be gun. Neither wind nor tide is always with us. Our course on a dark and stormy sea cannot always be clear. But we have set s ail--and the horizon, however cloudy, is also full of hope." To Turn th e Tide (Harper & Bros., 1962), vii.. [79] Lyndon B. Johnson, A Time for Action (NY: Atheneum, 1964). [80] Lyndon B. Johnson, My Hope for Americ a (NY: Random House, 1964). [81] Henry Brandon, "Candidate's Dilemma," r eview of Johnson, My Hope, Saturday Review 47 (17 Octo ber 1964), 16. [82] Barry Goldwater, The Conscience of a Conservative (N Y: Hillman, 1960); Why Not Victory? A Fresh Look at Am erican Foreign Policy (NY: McGraw-Hill, 1962). [83] Barry Goldwater, Whe re I Stand (NY: McGraw-Hill, 1964). [84] Roscoe Drummond, "GOP Candidate 's Position Papers," review of Goldwater, Conscience, in Saturday Review 47 (19 Sept. 1964), 41. [85] Ibid., 42. [86] By the methodological guidelines established for this study, books by Robert Kennedy fall outside its scope. However, at the time of his assassination, he was arguably the front-runner; a nd he had published several books in the Kennedy tradition but with his own, populist orientation, including Just Friends and B rave Enemies (NY: Popular Library, 1962); Pursuit of J ustice (NY: Harper & Bros., 1964); and To Seek a Newer World (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967), an obviously election-oriented statement of his beliefs, hopes, and plans. [87] Hub ert H. Humphrey, The Cause is Mankind (NY: Praeger, 1964); War on Poverty (NY: McGraw-Hill, 1964). [88] "[This book] is not me ant to be a statement of warlike defiance or a call to arms. It does n ot call for the conquest of one group or one world by another. Instead, it focuses on the struggle President Kennedy talked ab out and President Johnson continues. . . . I believe that with an infor med, common-sense, and compassionate approach -- the liberal approach, if you will -- the American future will be wonderful to behold." Humphrey, Cause, vii. [89] Hubert H. Humphrey, Beyond Civil Rights: A New Day of Equality (NY: Random House, 1968 ). [90] Albert Vorspan, "New Frontiers or Dark Old Days?" in review of Humphrey, Civil Rights, Saturday Review 51 (9 Nov. 196 8), 34. [91] Richard M. Nixon, Six Crises (NY: Doubleday, 1962); reissue d in 1968 by Pyramid (NY). [92] Richard Nixon, Nixon on the Issues (NY: Nixon-Agnew Campaign Committee, 1968) and Nixon Speaks Out: Major Speeches and Statements by Richard Nixon ( NY: Nixon-Agnew Campaign Committee, 1969). The six-da y production of the books is reported in Theodore White's The Making of the President--1968 (NY: Atheneum, 1969), 370. [93] Nixon Speaks Out, f rontispiece. [94] However, except for Theodore White's reference to t hem no industry notice had been taken of the 1968 book s, either; thus, it would not be surprising to find more such books had been published in 1972. See note 92 above. [95] Richa rd M. Nixon, New Road for America (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1972). [9 6] George S. McGovern, War Against Want (NY: Walker, 1964), Agricultura l Thought in the Twentieth Century (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967); and A Time of War, a Time of Peace (NY:Vintage, 1968) . [97] George S. McGovern, The Great Coalfield War (Boston: Houghton Mif flin, 1968). [98] Harry M. Caudill, "A Maddening Story," review of McGov ern, Coalfield War, New York Review of Books 19 (21 Sept. 1972), 38. [ 99] Christopher Lydon, "The Great Coalfield War," review of McGovern, Coa lfield War, New York Times (9 July 1972), Book Review, 4. [100] Nixon, Six Crises, xxiv, xxvii. [101] Examples of Reagan's bo oks are The Official Ronald Wilson Reagan Quote Book (St. Louis Park, MN: Chain-Pinkham, 1980); Ronald Reagan: In God I Trust ( Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House, 1983); Abortion and the Co nscience of the Nation (Nashville, TN: T. Nelson, 1984 ); Along Wit's Trail: The Humor and Wisdom of Ronald Reagan (NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1984). [102] Hamilton, "Why Can't Mr. President Write?" 146. [103] Ibid., 147. [104] Esther B. Fein, "Th e Voters Choose to Read, and Political Books Flourish," New York Times, 26 Oct., 1992, Financial section, 8. [105] New York T imes, 25 October 1992, Book Review section, 4. [106] Fein, "The Voters C hoose," 8. Books in Campaigns - BOOKS ARE WEAPONS SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF CANDIDATES' BOOKS Note: Books issued during the election year are listed immediately after the candidate's name. Those published prior to that year and, in the case of those running more than once,since the previous election year are listed below the indicator line. PRE-BROADCAST ERA 1900 Election William McKinley (R - Incumbent) Speeches and Addresses of William McKinley from March 1, 1887 to May 30, 1900. New York: Doubleday & McClure, 1900. "McKinley's Masterpieces." [listed in 1896 Nation review] 1896. Speeches and Addresses of William McKinley. New York: Appleton, 1893. Theodore Roosevelt (R - Vice President, became president in 1901) The Strenuous Life. New York: Century, 1900. The Naval War of 1812. New York: Putnam's, 1882. The Life of Thomas Hart Benton. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1886.The Life of Gouverneur Morris. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 188.The Winning of the West. New York: Putnam's, 1889. American Ideals, and Other Essays, Social and Political. [NY]: Putnam's, 1898. The Rough Riders. New York: Scribner's, 1899. William J. Bryan (D) --- The First Battle. Chicago: Conkey, 1896. 1904 Election Theodore Roosevelt (R)Addresses and Presidential Messages of Theodore Roosevelt. New York: Putnam's, 1904. Oliver Cromwell. New York: Scribner's, 1901.The Deer Family. New York, Macmillan, 1902. Alton B. Parker (D) --- 1908 Election William H. Taft (R) Present Day Problems: A Collection of Addresses Delivered on Various Occasions. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1908. Four Aspects of Civic Duty. New York: Scribners, 1907. William J. Bryan (D) The Real Bryan: Being Extracts from the Speeches and Writings of "A Well-Rounded Man" Des Moines, IA: Personal Help Publishing, 1908. Prebroadcast era, continued 1912 Woodrow Wilson (D) Congressional Government in the United States. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1885. George Washington. New York: Harper & Bros., 1886. Mere Literature. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1886. The State. Boston: D. C. Heath, 1889. A History of the American People. New York: Harper & Bros., 1902. Constitutional Government in the United States. New York: Columbia Univ., 1908. Theodore Roosevelt (I)Realizable Ideals. [New York]: Whitaker, 1912. The Real Roosevelt. New York: Putnam's, 1912. Presidential Addresses and State Papers. New York: Review of Reviews, 1910. Applied Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ., 1911. New Nationalism. New York: Outlook, 1911. 1 William H. Taft (R) --- Presidential Addresses and State Papers from March 4, 1909 to March 4, 1910. New York: Doubleday, 1910. RADIO ERA 1932 Election Franklin D. Roosevelt (D)Government Not Politics. New York: Covici, 1932. Herbert C. Hoover (R - Incumbant.) --- American Individualism. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, Page & Comapny, 1922] 1936 Election Franklin D. Roosevelt (D) --- Looking Forward. New York: John Day, 1933.On Our Way. New York: John Day, 1934. Alfred M. Landon (R)America at the Crossroads. New York: Dodge Publishing, 1936. Radio Era, continued 1940 Election Franklin D. Roosevelt (D) The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt. New York: Random House, 1938. Wendell L. Wilkie (R) --- 1944 Election Franklin D. Roosevelt (D)Rendezvous with Destiny. New York: Dryden, 1944. The Battle of 1776. New York: Reynal & Hitchcock, 1941. Thomas E. Dewey (R) The Case Against the New Deal. New York: Harper & Bros., 1940. TELEVISION ERA 1960 Election John F. Kennedy (D)The Strategy of Peace. New York: Harper & Bros., 1960. Why England Slept. New York: Funk, 1940.[To Turn the Tide. New York: Harper & Bros., 1962] Profiles in Courage. New York: Harper & Bros., 1956. Lyndon B. Johnson (D - Vice President, became president in1963) --- Richard M. Nixon (R)The Challenges We Face. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960. 1964 Election Lyndon B. Johnson (D)A Time for Action. New York: Atheneum, 1964.My Hope for America. New York: Random House, 1964. Barry M. Goldwater (R)Where I Stand. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964. The Conscience of a Conservative. New York: Hillman, 1960.Why Not Victory? A Fresh Look at American Foreign Policy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962. Television Era, continued 1968 Election Richard M. Nixon (R)Six Crises. New York: Pyramid, 1968. (Reissue of 1962 Doubleday edition.) Nixon on the Issues. New York: Nixon-Agnew Campaign Committe, 1968 Nixon Speaks Out. New York: Nixon-Agnew Campaign Committe, 1968 Hubert H. Humphrey (D) Beyond Civil Rights: A New Day of Equality. New York: Random House, 1968. The Cause is Mankind. New York: Praeger, 1964War on Poverty. New York: McGraw Hill, 1964 1972 Election Richard M. Nixon (R.) A New Road for America. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1972. George S. McGovern (D)The Great Coalfield War. With Leonard Guttridge. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. War against Want: America's Food for Peace Program. New York: Walker, 1964.Agricultural Thought in the Twentieth Century. (Ed.) Indianapolis, IA: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967A Time of War, A Time of Peace. New York: Vintage, 1968 Books in Campaigns - General Bibliography Barber, James David. "Characters in the Campaign: The Literary Problem." In Race for the Presidency: The Media and the Nominating Process. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1978. Brandon, Henry. "Candidate's Dilemma." Review of My Hope for America by Lyndon B. Johnson. Saturday Review 47 (17 Oct. 1964): 16. Brown, Francis. "Mr. Landon States His Principles." Review of America at the Crossroads by Alfred M. Landon. New York Times (27 Sept. 1936): Book Review section, 5. Burns, James MacGregor. John Kennedy: A Political Profile. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company, 1960. Caudill, Harry M. "A Maddening Story." Review of The Great Coalfield War by George S. McGovern. New York Review of Books 19 (21 Sept. 1972): 38. Clark, Blair. "The Strategy of Peace." Review of Strategy of Peace by John F. Kennedy. Saturday Review 43 (28 May 1960): 19. Clinton, William. Putting People First New York: Times Books, 1992. "Comment on Current Books." Review of Present Day Problems by William Howard Taft. Outlook 89 (1 Aug. 1908): 766 Democratic National Committee. Campaign Books of the Democratic Party Candidates and Issues 1896-1936. New York: Democratic National Committee, 1896-1936 (available on microfiche from the National Micropublishing Corp.). Drummond, Roscoe. "GOP Candidate's Position Papers." Review of Conscience of a Conservative by Barry M. Goldwater. Saturday Review 47 (19 Sept. 1964): 41 Euchner, Charles C. and John Anthony Maltese. Selecting the President: From Washington to Bush. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1992. Fein, Esther B. "The Voters Choose to Read, and Political Books Flourish," New York Times, 26 Oct.1992, Financial section, 8. "Franklin D. Roosevelt Speaks." Review of Government Not Politics by Franklin D. Roosevelt. New York Times (7 Aug. 1932): Book Review section, 1. Hamilton, John Maxwell. "Why Can't Mr. President Write?" Media Studies Journal 6, no. 2 (summer 1992): 139-51. Hamilton, John Maxwell. "Why Can't Mr. President Write?" In Media Studies Journal 6, no. 2 (Summer 1992): 139-51. Hess, Stephen. The Presidential Campaign. Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1978. Hynes, Terry. "Media Manipulation and Political Campaigns: Bruce Barton and the Presidential Elections of the Jazz Age." Journalism History 4, no. 3 (1977): 93-98. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. Packaging the Presidency: A History and Criticism of Presidential Campaign Advertising. New York: Oxford University, 1992. Kaid, Lynda Lee and Anne Johnston Wadsworth. Political Campaign Communication: A Bibliography and Guide to the Literature 1973-1982. Metuchen, N.J., Scarecrow, 1985. Lasky, Victor. Review of The Challenges We Face by Richard M. Nixon. Saturday Review 43 (2 July 1960): 15. Lasky, Victor. John F. Kennedy: What's Behind The Image? Washington, D.C.: Free World Press, 1960. League of Women Voters Education Fund. Choosing the President. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1980 Lippman,Walter. "'On Our Way'--A Book Review." Review of On Our Way by Franklin D. Roosevelt. New York Herald Tribune (20 Apr. 1934): 21 Lydon, Christopher. "The Great Coalfield War." Review of The Great Coalfield War by George S. McGovern. New York Times (9 July 1972): Book Review section, 4 Martin, Ralph G. and Ed Plaut. Front Runner, Dark Horse. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Company, 1960. McCarthy, Joe. The Remarkable Kennedys. New York: Dial, 1960. McGinniss, Joe. The Selling of the President 1968. New York: Trident, 1969. "McKinley's Masterpieces" Nation 62 (18 June 1896): 466. Miles,William. The Image Makers: A Bibliography of American Presidential Campaign Biographies. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow, 1979. Miles, William. The Image Makers: A Bibliography of American Presidential Campaign Biographies. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow, 1979. "Mr. Taft as His Own Interpreter." Review of Present Day Problems, by William Howard Taft. New York Times 12 (15 August 1908): 448. Nadel, Laurie. The Great Stream of History: A Biography of Richard M. Nixon. New York: Atheneum, 1991. "The New President as a Literary Man," Outlook 69 (21 Sept. 1901): 165. Newman, Bruce I. The Marketing of the President: Political Marketing as Campaign Strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994. Reinsch, J. Leonard. Getting Elected: From Radio and Roosevelt to Television and Reagan. New York: Hippocrene Books, 1988 Republican National Committee. Republican Campaign Text-Books 1900-1912. Philadelphia: Dunlap, 1900-1912 (available on microfiche from the National Micropublishing Corp.). Review of Congressional Government by Woodrow Wilson. Nation 91 (22 Sept. 1910), 256. Review of Government Not Politics by Franklin D. Roosevelt. Boston Transcript (3 Aug, 1932): 3. Review of Speeches and Addresses of William McKinley by William McKinley. Nation 58 (8 Feb. 1894): 104. Review of The Challenges We Face by Richard M. Nixon. Booklist 56 (15 July 1960): 679. Roosevelt, Elliott R. and James Brough. A Rendezvous with Destiny. New York: Putnams, 1975. Roosevelt, Franklin Delano. "'Books Are Weapons', Says President Roosevelt." Poster: Three messages from President Roosevelt about books, printed for distribution by the Library Binding Institute, 1942. Schlesinger, Arthur, Jr. Kennedy or Nixon: Does It Make Any Difference? New York: Macmillan, 1960. Sevareid, Eric. Candidates 1960: Behind the Headlines in the Presidential Race. New York: Basic Books, 1959. Spragens, William C. Popular Images of American Presidents. New York: Greenwood, 1988. Streitmatter, Rodger. "Theodore Roosevelt: Public Relations Pioneer." American Journalism 7 (Spring 1990): 96-113. Vorspan, Albert. "New Frontiers or Dark Old Days?" Review of Beyond Civil Rights by Hubert H. Humphrey. Saturday Review 51 (9 Nov. 1968): 34 White, Theodore H. The Making of the President 1964. New York: Signet, 1965. White, Theodore H. The Making of the President 1968. New York: Atheneum, 1969. White, Theodore H. The Making of the President 1972. New York: Atheneum, 1973. Witcover, J. Marathon: The Pursuit of the Presidency, 1972-1976. New York: Viking, 1977.