Content-Type: text/html

Separating ourselves from our personal feelings on a particular software is sometimes difficult(I am the first to admit this), but needed to best serve our respective communities. That being said, I think a lot of legitimate technical issues have been raised by various responders as to why IE6 should not be supported in their online communities.<div>
<br></div><div>It also comes down to resources.  If he had unlimited man hours, we could definitely make something workable for all browsers. Reaching the largest possible users in an ethical, forward thinking manner is just as important as the technical skills we all bring to the job in my opinion.  Unfortunately, the reality is that our resources are not unlimited and we must carefully choose which battles to fight and which ones to walk away from.  </div>
<div><br></div><div>As it has been pointed out, we all have different user bases and environments, meaning everyone&#39;s decisions will influenced accordingly.  At Comm. Arts, we actually are seeing between 5-7% IE6 usage, so for us having a fairly technically inclined user base allowed us to move forward with dropping support for IE6.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I would also like to point out that our filter will allow users to proceed on with the site experience after informing them of why the site will not render correctly, security concerns, etc.  Forcing a user to leave the site, because they do not have a modern browser would make us no different then the very software developers at Microsoft that many of us disdain. </div>
<div><br></div><div>-Marc<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Kwiatkowski, Nicholas <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a>"><a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a></a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">





<div bgcolor="#ffffff">
<div style="font-family:Tahoma;direction:ltr;color:#000000;font-size:13px">
<div>Personally I think that if a user has not decided to upgrade to a newer browser from any of the other major sites (Google/Yahoo/CNN/etc), that it is not tough to think that you having a message on your site will make any difference.</div>

<div><font size="2" face="tahoma"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="tahoma">I would guess that most people who are still on IE6 are on IE6 due to corporate restrictions (I see this a lot -- many use a specific web app that requires certain Active X Components that they won&#39;t be upgrading any time soon),
 or because they are still on dialup and it would take hours, if not days to download the latest (IE 7 + patches comes in at a whopping 450 MB for XP users). 
</font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="tahoma"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="tahoma">Nudging people by saying that the content is optimized for a newer browser is all I can really recommend.  Forcing them, or blocking content puts us in a situation where it would seem that we don&#39;t want to serve them.</font></div>

<div><font size="2" face="tahoma"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="tahoma">-Nick Kwiatkowski</font></div>
<div dir="ltr"><font color="#000000" size="2" face="Tahoma"></font> </div>
<div style="direction:ltr">
<hr>
<font color="#000000" size="2" face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b> Roger Chance [<a href="mailto:<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a>" target="_blank"><a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a></a>]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:57 AM<div class="im"><br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a>" target="_blank">WEB<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a></a><br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5"><b>Subject:</b> Re: Our beloved IE6<br>
</div></div></font><br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div></div>
<div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">I think it is a good idea to filter traffic using older browsers to encourage upgrade on sites where older browser would be a security risk.  I do wonder if that filter should be broader than just IE6.  Older versions of Firefox,
 Safari and Chrome have all been upgraded in part to address security issues.</font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">Since one is filtering on a browser version it would seem to me to be appropriate to provide browser and OS specific content.  Viewer comes in with IE 6 provide IE upgrade information and link as the prominent choice.  Comes
 in with old version of Firefox provide Firefox info and upgrade link as prominent choice.</font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">Just as many open source projects do, come in on a Windows OS and the top of the page download button and info is for Windows version.  Mac or Linux OS and the appropriate download button and info that tops the page is for them,
 with other offerings listed below.</font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">Leading someone to download Firefox or Chrome when the run IE 6 is probably an uphill battle plus may leave them with the impression that they are &quot;required&quot; to select something different than they currently run.</font></div>

<div><font size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">I have family that would be challenged to upgrade the browser they use and get annoyed at every difference between old and new.  You get them to download a different browser and they will hate you.  And
</font><font size="2" face="Arial">I&#39;ll probably be pretty annoyed at having to explain it to them while they complain about your site.</font></div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">Roger</font></div>
<blockquote style="border-left:#000000 2px solid;padding-left:5px;padding-right:0px;margin-left:5px;margin-right:0px" dir="ltr">
<div style="font:10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </div>
<div style="font:10pt arial;background:#e4e4e4"><b>From:</b> <a title="<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a>" href="mailto:<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a>" target="_blank">
Marc Hudson</a> </div>
<div style="font:10pt arial"><b>To:</b> <a title="<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a>DU" href="mailto:<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a>" target="_blank">
<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a></a> </div>
<div style="font:10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:36 PM</div>
<div style="font:10pt arial"><b>Subject:</b> Re: Our beloved IE6</div>
<div><br>
</div>
For us, it came down to security.  IE6 has several well known major security exploits.  We actively funnel interested parties to <a href="http://givingto.msu.edu" target="_blank">givingto.msu.edu</a>.  Sending users who use IE6 to a page where they may pass
 sensitive financial information wasn&#39;t something we were interested in doing.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>IE6 has been effectively discontinued by many major websites including Google, Youtube, Facebook, etc. because development costs far outweigh the advantages to supporting it.  Also, as Michael pointed out, Microsoft has announced discontinuation of support.
  </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As far as reaching the largest possible audience is concerned, we designed the new
<a href="http://cas.msu.edu" target="_blank">cas.msu.edu</a> website with many bandwidth saving techniques, including image sprites, which aren&#39;t supported in IE6.  Reaching users with limited internet options was more important than providing support for a
 dated browser which exposes our users to a variety of security risks. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>That being said, we are working on an IE6 filter that clearly explains our position and provides links to a number of free and popular browsers including Firefox, Safari, Chrome, and Opera. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-Marc<br>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:07 PM, VanPutten, Michael <span dir="ltr">
&lt;<a href="mailto:<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a>" target="_blank">Micha<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1009%26L%3DWEBDEVCAFE%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D124513%26B%3D--0016368e2bb14402c5048fd85d1c%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3Dwindows-1252" >[log in to unmask]</a></a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="border-left:#ccc 1px solid;margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">We all work under diverse circumstances that require different approaches.
<br>
<br>
I admire developers who create pages that: <br>
<br>
</span></font>
<ul>
<li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">have HTML and CSS code that validates without errors or warnings (i.e., you are in the right ball park for having the content of the page be usable by most visitors)
</span></font></li><li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">have pages that pass automated accessibility tools (e.g.,
<a href="http://webaim.org" target="_blank">webaim.org</a>) </span></font></li><li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">add enhanced functionality that doesn’t impact getting access to information or requesting services (i.e., you can still use the site with most any desktop or mobile Web browser,
 even if it is coded for HTML5 and only really looks its best in Safari or other browser)<br>
</span></font></li></ul>
<font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt"><br>
<br>
<br>
Regarding IE 6...<br>
<br>
Microsoft publishes information about the support life cycle for their products. Information regarding Internet Explorer 6 can be found by visiting
<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifesupsps/#Internet_Explorer" target="_blank">
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifesupsps/#Internet_Explorer</a>. Here is what they say:<br>
<br>
</span></font>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">Support ends 24 months after the next service pack releases or at the end of the product&#39;s support lifecycle, whichever comes first.
<br>
<br>
</span></font></blockquote>
<font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">Dates for when service packs for Windows XP were released can be found here:
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/servicepacks.mspx" target="_blank">
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/servicepacks.mspx</a>. The site indicates that no further updates are planned for Windows XP. So, the final SP release dates are:<br>
<br>
</span></font>
<ul>
<li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">XP Home Edition SP3 was released May 6, 2008
</span></font></li><li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt">XP Professional SP3 was released May 6, 2008<br>
</span></font></li></ul>
<font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt"><br>
Official support for Internet Explorer 6 (which would have been bundled with a service pack) would be May 6, 2010. So, the software doesn’t appear to be supported by its vendor anymore.<br>
<font color="#888888"><b><br>
Michael VanPutten<br>
</b>Senior Marketing Communications Manager for Web and New Media<br>
<font color="#006531"><b>Michigan State University &gt; </b></font>University Relations<br>
<font color="#006531">Spartans Will.</font></font></span></font> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>

</blockquote></div><br></div>