Content-Type: text/html This paper was presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication in Toronto, Canada, August 2004. If you have questions about this paper, please contact the author directly. If you have questions about the archives, email [log in to unmask] For an explanation of the subject line, send email to [log in to unmask] with just the four words, "get help info aejmc," in the body (drop the ""). (Oct 2004) Thank you. Elliott Parker ************************************************************************ Community Newspapers As Instruments of Social Control: Updating Community Conflict and the Press Michael L. Thurwanger Bradley University Mail Address: Michael Thurwanger 6415 N. Suffolk Drive Peoria, IL 61615 Phone: (O) 309-677-2366 (H) 309-691-5486 E-Mail: twanger@ bradley.edu 3 Newspapers As Instruments of Social Control Community Newspapers As Instruments of Social Control: Updating Community Conflict and the Press Nearly a quarter century ago, the Minnesota research team of Tichenor, Donohue and Olien (1980) published their study of local newspapers in community conflict, concluding that they "are not the independent, self-styled social agents that either they or members of the public imagine them to be" (p. 217). Among their findings was that local newspapers perform a social-control function through the management of information provided to the community and this role is most evident in small, homogeneous communities. Echoing the findings of Janowitz (1967), they concluded that local newspapers avoided reporting internal conflict in the interest of maintaining harmony while presenting an image of consensus. Such content decisions serve as a form of control that "has far-reaching implications for what the community will hear about, think about, and talk about" (1980, p. 20). They called for additional research to validate their findings in the face of ongoing social and media industry changes. Among those changes are trends reflecting a decline in local autonomy as state and federal governments, major businesses and outside industries have an increasing influence on local policies and economies. At the same time, mass media usage and media industry practices have undergone significant change in the face of ownership consolidation and a proliferation of new media choices. This study proposed to build on the work of Tichenor, Donohue and Olien and explore the social control function played by local newspapers serving communities covering a significant issue having the potential to cause conflict within the community. The study also attempted to validate several of the research team's earlier findings with regard to the correlation between community pluralism and evidence of social control. Finally, the 24-year span of analysis covered in this study offered an opportunity to test for evidence of change in the social control function due to societal and media industry changes over time. The focal point for this study was the issue of prison site-selection in the state of Illinois. In the past, corrections facilities were often opposed by local residents, however some communities have begun to court these facilities as sources of economic growth. The clash between individual concerns and community desires provided a likely source of conflict in which the local newspaper could be expected to play an active role. Literature Review Prison issue. During the past quarter century, this nation experienced an unprecedented boom in its prison population and in the construction of the prison infrastructure necessary to house it. In 2001, state and federal prison populations in the United States exceeded 2.1 million inmates ("Illinois prison population," 2003, July 28). Prison has become big business and an industry unto itself (Hallinan, 2001; Schlosser, 1998). Hallinan (2001) raised concern over the lack of national debate surrounding this critical social and policy issue. "At the time the prisons were being built, almost no one publicly questioned the consequences of this growth. No one asked what happens when prison becomes an industry, like steel or coal, or when large numbers of free people are given an economic stake in the imprisonment of others" (p. 85). Illinois reflects national trends, having nearly tripled its inventory of state correctional facilities during a period stretching from 1980 through the most recent site selections announced in April 2001. Illinois corrections construction typified national patterns in which the vast majority of new prison sites were built in or near small, rural communities. This pattern of site selection served as a form of economic subsidy for communities in depressed regions while meeting the state's need for expediency by locating traditionally undesirable facilities where they were least likely to face organized opposition (Gibbons & Pierce, 1995; Schlosser, 1998; Shicor, 1992; Takahashi & Graber, 1998). Prisons have typically elicited a "Not-In-My-Backyard" reaction in the past with local residents expressing concerns about such issues as personal safety, threats to community integrity represented by an influx of prison staff and inmate families, and a "prison town" stigma (Carlson, 1988, 1990; Krause, 1992; Popper, 1981). While larger communities with more diversified economic and political bases continue to oppose such proposals, small economically-challenged communities now actively compete for selection as a prison site. Local leaders work within these communities to garner support and present an image of community consensus fully supportive of the prison proposal (Schlosser, 1998). Community newspapers. Janowitz (1991) identified the mass media's traditional role in democratic society as threefold: contributing to a high level of participation, stimulating meaningful deliberation upon which citizens arrive at voting decisions, and operating to preclude one side from gaining undue advantage through the press. To the extent that the press failed to achieve these ideals, the democratic process does not represent true consent but becomes "an exercise in mass pressure" (p. 245). Tichenor, Donohue and Olien (1980) observed that the traditional image of the community newspaper has been one of self-determination and independence, though they argued that this is not an accurate image. Analysis of community newspaper content has consistently shown that internal community conflict was avoided and controversy received little emphasis in news or editorial content when compared to larger newspapers (Breed, 1958; Janowitz, 1967, 1991; Tichenor, Donohue & Olien, 1980). Community newspapers have been found to perform a social integration function in which regular readers use newspaper content to establish ties with their community, resulting in higher levels of community cohesion, identification and participation (Davidson & Cotter, 1997; Edelstein & Larson, 1960; Janowitz, 1967; Merton, 1949; Park, 1925, 1929). Park (1925) was one of the first to break with the traditional image of the press as independent, portraying the relationship between the local press and community as interdependent. Janowitz (1967) characterized newspapers as a sub-set of a larger community system where the community audience "conditions its content, determines its appeal, and facilitates its impact" (p. xxi). Others have noted the economic imperative for the newspaper to create a place for itself within that community identity because the success of its product depends on the interest and acceptance of community members (Edelstein & Schulz, 1963; Kaniss, 1991). Banfield and Wilson (1963) argued that the local newspaper's interest in economic growth "inclines it toward boosterism, and inclines it also on occasion to 'play down' or even suppress news that would put the city in a bad light" (p. 321). Janowitz (1967) identified the functions of the editor and publisher as central to the study of community newspapers, suggesting that the publisher served as an index to understanding how conflicts between competing interest groups are resolved at the local level. Webster (1987) described the publisher's position as an ethical dilemma—the demands for journalistic standards of objective detachment versus the responsibility as a local leader to support community economic and social development. A number of researchers have commented on this dual expectation. Publishers and editors must represent the newspaper and observe standards of objectivity and balance but, as educated and influential members of the community, they are expected to be active participants in the community's administration (Byerly, 1961; Fitzgerald, 1996; Gaziano & McGrath, 1987; Janowitz, 1967; Sneed & Riffe, 1991; Tuchman, 1978). Others focused on business responsibilities, noting that publishers and editors must maintain close ties with other business leaders and those ties are critical to the newspaper's economic survival (Byerly, 1961; Janowitz, 1967; Kennedy, 1974). Breed (1955) noted that the influence of the publisher on newspaper policy is constrained by journalistic norms, but he found that policies regarding news coverage of political, economic and labor issues were subtly shaped by omissions in coverage, preferential selection and placement. In spite of references to publishers and editors as members of the community elite, Donohue, Tichenor and Olien (1995) argued that the community newspaper and its representatives are not integrated as equals in the community power structure due, in part, to the newspaper's dependence on members of the power structure for access and information. This reflected Janowitz' (1967) view of community newspapers, not as part of the power structure, but as an intermediary between individuals and major community institutions. Donohue, Tichenor and Olien (1995) described the role of the local newspaper as presenting a sense of community consensus, distributing information on behalf of local elites. Far from a watchdog that scrutinizes the actions of those in power, newspapers in small communities were described as a "sleeping guard dog" protecting the status quo and serving the interests of the local power structure (p. 116). Social control. Warren (1978) defined social control as the "process through which a group influences the behavior of its members to conform with its norms" (p. 10-11). This concept has undergone considerable change in terms of its definition and focus (Janowitz, 1975, 1978, 1991; Roucek, 1978; Sumner, 1997). During the early part of the past century, social control was primarily concerned with a benign model exploring social organization and how groups regulate themselves (Janowitz, 1991). Early sociologists such as Mead, Dewey, and Park all addressed a need for society to construct and maintain shared systems of values and social norms. Dewey (1927) and Park (1925) suggested that the press was one of the institutions that served this function. Martindale (1978) noted that social control was initially presented as a natural order that society pursued instinctively with individuals requiring some degree of external control to overcome self-interest and join in a common effort to attain order. However, research shifted to an exploration of the means by which social controls were applied, often in connection with the related concepts of socialization and deviance. This shift sought answers to identify who exercises social control and for what purpose? (Roucek, 1978). Gamson (1968) viewed social control as a means of eliminating or minimizing the influence of competing constituents. Local leaders have two options to deal with constituents—appeasement by meeting their demands, or control through persuasion and other means. Both Dahl (1982) and Stone (1989) addressed the costs and benefits of social control in terms of political and economic capital. They noted that individuals and groups might influence policy-making processes by increasing the costs of maintaining social control through such tactics as activism and litigation. Conversely, Dahl (1961) observed that where competition has been removed by effective social control, political entrepreneurs can more readily exert their infleunce. Gamson (1968) listed a number of ways that authorities could exert control, including efforts to influence public opinion on an issue and the regulation of access to decision-makers and to information. Social control function of newspapers. McCombs (1997) cited local media sources as playing a critical role in setting a community agenda that emphasizes arriving at and maintaining consensus on community issues. Janowitz (1967) found that community newspapers served to maintain local consensus through an emphasis on shared values rather then on the resolution of conflict. Internal conflicts were viewed as divisive while conflicts with external forces helped unify the community against an outside threat and legitimized the role of local leaders in representing community interests. Breed (1958) observed that local news coverage often conveyed a "chamber of commerce attitude" (p. 111) in which newspapers served as local boosters to ensure community support and attract economic growth. This was reflected in editorial decisions against covering failures or social aspects that undermined the community image. Breed conducted what he termed "a reverse content analysis" (p. 112) to identify those elements of news and information that are regularly omitted from local coverage. The most frequent omission was related to what Breed labeled the "undemocratic power of business elites" (p. 111). He concluded that these omissions in coverage served to preserve citizen confidence in the community and its institutions. Among the types of social power identified by Galbraith (1983) is conditioning power, the ability to win submission without coercion. Control of information has been identified as a form of conditioning power and Mott (1970) identified information control as a vital resource in establishing social control. He attributed that power to mass media organizations by virtue of their role in identifying, defining and articulating social problems. Gamson (1968) identified news management— the selective withholding of information—as a technique used in maintaining social control. A number of theorists support the view that the community newspaper plays a significant role in maintaining social control by selectively reinforcing, legitimizing and endorsing accepted views (Altschull, 1995; Carey, 1979; Donohue, Tichenor & Olien, 1995; Janowitz, 1978, 1991; Lasswell, 1949; Shoemaker & Reese, 1996; Tichenor, Donohue & Olien, 1980). Tichenor, Donohue and Olien studied community newspapers, concluding that they "exercise a major social-control function" (1980, p. 79). Whether by choice or circumstance, the authors observed that the selective pattern of media attention paid to issues reinforces certain social norms and values. They theorized that local newspapers serve a control function through two types of information control. In its feedback information control function, the local press facilitates conflict resolution by increasing problem awareness, defining the issue and encouraging public discourse, even as it defines the accepted boundaries of that debate. This is not an independent function, but is influenced or controlled by members of the community power structure who often use public reaction to gauge acceptance, refine their position, and call for action (Tichenor, Donohue & Olien, 1980, p. 85). The distribution information control function serves to maintain the community social system by disseminating general information for routine consumption with no expectation of active participation by readers. Hindman (1996) observed that editorial decisions not to cover an issue also served a distributive information control function. Studies have found that newspapers serving larger and more complex communities carry more conflict coverage than those serving smaller, more homogeneous communities (Hindman, 1996; Tichenor, Donohue & Olien, 1970, 1980). Hindman (1996) also found that conflict is most frequently covered in local mass media when it has been initiated or endorsed by community leaders. Tichenor, Donohue and Olien (1980) found coverage reflected the views of "the dominant group based on the structure and distribution of social power in the community" (p. 218). They also noted that in the American experience, this trend means that local media generally reflect the outlook of the business community. Community structural pluralism. Tichenor, Donohue, and Olien (1980) identified the degree of community pluralism as a useful predictor of the degree of social conflict within a community and the extent of conflict coverage in its newspaper. Conflict is accommodated in larger, more pluralistic communities through a variety of formal "pressure valve mechanisms" such as public hearings, grievance procedures and citizen review boards, all of which receive press coverage (Hindman, 1996). In smaller communities, open and public expressions of differences may disrupt the normal functioning of the community and, as a result, the mention of such differences is avoided (Tichenor, Donohue & Olien, 1980). The social-control function of the community newspaper was found to depend largely upon the social structure of the community served by the newspaper. Newspapers serving less pluralist communities were found more likely to focus on the distributive function, while newspapers in more complex communities focused a greater portion of coverage on the feedback function (Donohue, Tichenor, & Olien, 1973; Tichenor, Donohue & Olien, 1970, 1980; Viswanath & Arora, 2000). Changes in community and mass media. Tichenor, Donohue, and Olien (1980) expressed concern regarding the external validity of their findings over time and in the face of social change. They expressed particular concern about emerging social trends, noting that the autonomy of rural communities was likely to weaken in the face of increasing influence from external institutions and agencies. The growing power of state and federal government and of large outside businesses to impact on community revenue, regulation and employment threatened the status quo with regard to the role of local elites. At the same time, increasing ownership of local newspapers by external media corporations, trends toward reliance on alternative media sources for news and information, and the promise of new media technologies all suggested that the role of community newspapers and the local publisher would undergo significant change. These changes forecast increased pluralism even in smaller communities, resulting in a weakening of social control by local elites and of the information control function exercised by community newspapers. Hypotheses Hypothesis one addressed the opening presentation of the issue in newspaper coverage and provided a preliminary measure of the social-control function of the local newspaper in terms of initial access to information and evidence of distributive control versus feedback control. H1: Initial news coverage introducing the prospect of the community seeking consideration as a prison site will present the initiative as a decision already taken by community leaders. To test this hypothesis, the first day's coverage of the issue in each newspaper was identified and the content evaluated in terms of whether the issue was presented as a decision already taken or one yet to be decided. This is consistent with the findings of Tichenor, Donohue and Olien (1980; Donohue, Olien & Tichenor, 1985) that portray the local newspaper as primarily serving a distributive information function in such circumstances after local elites arrive at consensus among themselves (Domhoff, 1998). Previous studies have found that in smaller, more homogeneous communities, the local newspaper presents the majority of coverage in potentially contentious issues as routine information that is provided to inform readers, portraying the issue in terms of consensus in which no response is expected and reflecting a continuation of the distributive information function. H2: News and editorial coverage of the prison-siting issue by the community newspaper will frame the issue in terms of community consensus more frequently than in terms of community conflict. As in the previous hypothesis, each paragraph of coverage was analyzed to determine whether the prison-siting issue was described in the context of community consensus or conflict. The third hypothesis employed community structural pluralism indices identified by Hindman, Ernst, and Richardson (2001) to test relationships between community structure and the newspaper's social-control function. H3: Newspapers serving communities having greater structural pluralism indices will provide a higher proportion of conflict coverage than communities with lesser structural pluralism. Conflict content and the direction of coverage were analyzed to determine the strength of correlation with community structural pluralism. Finally, Tichenor, Donohue, and Olien (1980) expressed concern regarding the external validity of their findings with regard to their applicability over time and in the face of social change. This leads to the last hypothesis, which exploits the quarter century of local news coverage in this study to compare conflict coverage across this period to determine whether a significant change in patterns of coverage could be identified. H4: More recent community newspaper coverage of the prison site-selection issue will reflect a greater proportion of conflict coverage than coverage published earlier in the period under study. Once again, conflict content and the direction of coverage were examined to determine the strength of correlation with the dates of publication. Method Sample. The sample for this study included 24 weekly, semi-weekly and small daily newspapers serving Illinois communities that had successfully sought selection as the site of a state correctional facility constructed between 1980 and 2001. Local news coverage of the prison site-selection process began in 1977. Communities ranged in population from less than 500 to more than 88,000 residents. Of the newspapers serving these communities, 16 were dailies while eight were published less frequently. Five communities did not have a newspaper published within the community itself so the newspaper published closest to the prison site was used. Newspaper circulation totals varied from the largest with a daily circulation of 51,920 down to the smallest with a weekly circulation of 2,150. The mean circulation figure for all newspapers used in this study was 12,697 copies. The composition and size of the newspapers and the characteristics of the communities they serve fit the criteria developed by Byerly (1961) in defining community newspapers. (See appendix A for a list of communities and newspapers used.) A census was conducted of all news and editorial coverage directly related to the prison site-selection issue. The period of coverage was defined as beginning with the first article reporting the state's initiation of a selection cycle or the first article suggesting regional or community interest in seeking selection. The period continued through official announcement of the site selection and for two weeks thereafter. The period following the selection announcement was included to account for follow-up activities by the community and state as well as to include coverage of public reaction following the decision. Content Analysis. The sampling units for the study were individual issues of the community newspaper published during the defined period for that community. The primary source of newspaper articles were microfilmed copies accessible through the Illinois State Newspaper Archives. All articles and other items of newspaper content referring to the prison issue were identified. Articles reporting the meetings of local government, business and civic groups were reviewed for individual paragraphs related to the prison proposal even if the primary focus of the article addressed other, unrelated issues or items of business. Only the body text of news, editorials (including op-ed pieces and columns) and letters to the editor were coded. Letters to the editor were included for content analysis because they represent content subject to editorial policy including the decision to publish and to edit letters for length or content. A total of 1,019 items were identified and copied. Articles found to report on corrections issues but without specific reference to the community in question were eliminated, resulting in a final sample of 897 articles included in the content analysis. For the purposes of this study, individual paragraphs were used as the unit of analysis. This was considered appropriate for thematic analysis related to the direction of content and depiction as consensus or conflict. Coders counted individual paragraphs and analyzed each as a separate unit of meaning in accordance with the various categories and rules provided in the coding protocols. Thematic analysis was conducted for the analysis of the direction of content and portrayal of the issue as conflict or consensus. Holsti (1969) emphasized the importance of an identifiable subject in defining themes and for this study that subject was defined as the prison site-selection issue in the context of the community being evaluated. The first step in the coding process, then, was to determine whether the paragraph being evaluated referred to the prison issue and whether the reference was related to the specific community in question. Both Krippendorf and Holsti recognized the usefulness of thematic units because these address the intent of the communicator, however, both also raise concerns regarding issues of reliability in coding these units (Riffe, Lacy & Fico, 1998). Coding. Definitions and coding categories for each stage of the content analysis were developed from the related literature. Coding categories, rules and procedures were tested and refined over several months of training and coding sessions to improve reliability. Throughout this initial process, coders worked together to review and clarify coding categories and protocols. Coding sheets were prepared and modified to support the protocols. These sheets required the coder to verify identification and content information for the articles including the type of content, date of publication, and number of paragraphs[1]. Initial Status. The first day's coverage of the prison-siting proposal in the community newspaper was analyzed to address hypothesis one and to determine whether the issue was presented to the public as a decision already made or as a proposal still open to public discourse and debate. Coding for this hypothesis was conducted separately from the rest of the study and used only articles published in each newspaper's first day of coverage addressing the community's entry into the site-selection process. First day's coverage was defined as the first article to appear in each community newspaper that addressed the prison issue specifically in relation to the community in question. Each paragraph of the articles was analyzed regarding how the prison issue was presented. Coding categories consisted of the following: • Decided content presented the prison issue as a decision already made or action already initiated by local governments, community leaders or quasi-official agencies. • Undecided content presented the issue as an option to be considered or as an issue yet to be decided before action is taken. Examples included calls for additional information, plans for local polls or hearings to seek public reaction. • Neutral content was defined as paragraphs that referred to the issue but did not address the status of the decision or for which a status could not be identified. These provided background information without addressing the status of the issue. • Unrelated content was defined as those paragraphs included in an article that were not in any way related to the community in question or to the site-selection issue. Direction. All coverage was coded to evaluate the direction of the paragraph's content relevant to prison site-selection. Coders evaluated whether content portrayed prison facilities and the decision to seek site-selection in a favorable or unfavorable light. This required coders to analyze the paragraph's content to determine whether (1) prisons in general, (2) the prospect of attaining a prison facility in the vicinity or (3) the impact of a prison is portrayed as positive or negative outcomes. If the information presented in the paragraph was worded in neutral terms, used a mix of both positive and negative references, or if there was no clear position presented in the paragraph, the unit was coded as neutral. Conflict versus consensus. Coders reviewed each paragraph to determine whether it presented the issue in the context of internal conflict or general consensus. For conflict content, definition and categories were developed from that used by Donohue, Olien and Tichenor (1985; Olien, Donohue & Tichenor, 1968). "Local conflict was coded as (coverage) devoted to reporting about manifestly differing positions or statements about a public issue from at least two persons, factions or interest groups in the community. The question was not whether an article reported about a subject of controversy, but whether that article made clear that a controversy was involved"(1985, p. 492). Examples of conflict coverage included reports of public disagreements, demands for additional information or reconsideration, and concerns or objections at any level of community including individual objections raised in letters to the editor. No similar definition was available for consensus content. For this study, community consensus content was defined as content that portrayed the majority of the community in general agreement on the issue, that characterized actions as being taken in response to a sense of broad community support, that made a direct appeal for public unity and support, or that conveyed such appeals from community organizations, officials or leaders. If the paragraph addressed the prison issue but could be coded as neither consensus nor conflict, it was coded as neutral content. Paragraphs that addressed the prison issue in the context of the experiences or bids of other communities or that recounted reactions of the community in a previous selection cycle were also coded as neutral. Paragraphs coded as unrelated to the site-selection issue were not coded for conflict/consensus. Coder training and reliability. A primary coder was responsible for coding all articles with a secondary coder analyzing a random sample of content to measure intercoder reliability. Coders underwent an extensive training process, beginning with a detailed review and discussion of the coding protocols including procedures, categories, and definitions. Once a consistent application of the rules and procedures was developed and desired intercoder reliability levels were achieved, the primary coder completed the coding of all content while the secondary coder analyzed the reliability sample. A random sample of the content was analyzed to assess intercoder and intracoder reliability. Lacy and Riffe (1996) suggest that the size of reliability samples should be calculated to provide valid reliability estimates and a known degree of confidence. Their formula was used to calculate the appropriate size of the reliability sub-sample, resulting in a total of 125 articles randomly selected from the 897 articles included in the study, well within the 10 to 25 percent range suggested by Wimmer and Dominick (2003). Both intercoder and intracoder reliability was well above the 75 percent level established prior to the study with direction of content for intercoder reliability the only category falling below the 80 percent mark. (See appendix B.) Community structural pluralism indices. To address hypotheses three, a measure of community pluralism was developed using the multiple measure community pluralism indices employed by Hindman, Ernst and Richardson (2001). Using data obtained from the 1990 U.S. Department of Commerce census, this analysis used city and county populations; percentage of county workforce not involved in agricultural, forestry or fishing occupations; and the percentage of county residents who have obtained a bachelor's degree. The 1990 U.S. Census data represent the approximate mid-point of the period being analyzed and were viewed as the most appropriate to the focus of this study. (A listing of community structural pluralism indices is provided in appendix C.) Findings Review of the 24 community newspapers included in the study yielded a total of 1,019 items. Of these, 897 articles (88%) met the study's criteria for inclusion in the content analysis. Individual paragraphs were used as the unit of analysis with 10,996 examined. Of that total, 1,761 paragraphs (16%) were coded as content unrelated to the prison issue. (See appendix D for distribution of content.) H1: Initial coverage. A total of 26 articles were identified as meeting the study's definition of opening-day coverage. Of those, 24 were locally prepared news stories and two were editorials. Many of the news stories reported discussion, votes or actions taken by local government bodies in the context of routine business resulting in a total of 137 paragraphs (30.4%) found to be unrelated to the prison issue. Of the remaining content, more than half (54.3%) were evaluated as neutral in terms of the status of the decision to pursue selection as a prison site at the community level. These neutral paragraphs did relate to the prison issue, providing information and context, but did not address the status of a decision on the issue. Those paragraphs that did address the status of the decision at the community level supported the hypothesis. Paragraphs coded as decided units totaled 121 (38.7% of content related to the issue) while only 22 undecided units were identified (7.0% of relevant units). Paragraphs that framed the issue as decided occurred more than five times as frequently as those suggesting that a decision remained to be made or that actively sought public input on the issue. (See appendix E.) In light of this imbalance, hypothesis one is accepted. This pattern of coverage is consistent with the observations of Tichenor, Donohue and Olien (1980), who found that newspapers seldom led community discourse but that coverage was begun after the initial decision had been made. The resulting coverage reports these as routine decisions and presents them as a focus of general community consensus. The bulk of the relevant content presented was neutral and clearly served a routine distributive information role but the great majority of the information that did address the status of the decision treated the issue as routine distributive information as well. Only seven percent of the relevant content was presented as pertaining to an undecided issue, suggesting the need for public response or feedback. Though overall coverage was predominantly decided, five of the 24 communities presented more undecided units of content in their initial coverage than decided content. Three of these involved state proposals to convert state mental centers to prisons. In all three cases, the mental health center was long established, a major employer and closure was opposed by significant segments of the public. In these cases, community consensus had not been reached and the timing of the state initiatives and announcements preempted the local decision-making process. Two other community newspapers presented coverage that was predominantly undecided. The first had sought a prison in an earlier cycle but was not selected, in part because of local opposition. This past opposition was noted in the story and provided context for the mayor and city council's apparent indecision at this early stage in the process. The second had not previously sought a prison in past selection cycles, but the article suggested that the question had met with a negative response when considered during earlier selection cycles. In both of these cases, the newspaper performed a feedback control function in which community leaders used the initial article to gauge community response and solicit public feedback. Thus, these exceptions are consistent with the social control models and predicted patterns as reported by Tichenor, Donohue and Olien (1980). H2: Conflict versus consensus. Nearly two-thirds (65.7%) of the coded units were found to be neutral on the question of conflict versus consensus. This was to be expected as coding of conflict and consensus was specifically tied to the community in question and to the current prison site-selection cycle. Paragraphs that defined terms, that described the process and bids by other communities, or that provided history and context surrounding the issue are all examples of the types of content that would typically be coded as neutral. The definition applied in this element of coding also limited the definition of consensus to references that encompassed the community or a broad segment of it. Statements that expressed the views of a single individual or a small group may have been coded as positive in direction but were coded as neutral in terms of consensus. Individual statements of opposition and those that addressed concerns of a small group, however, were coded as conflict. This distinction was considered an appropriate interpretation of the definition of community conflict and consensus as used in this study and it served to enhance the reliability of the study. This distinction may raise concerns regarding potential coding bias but the impact of such a bias, if present, results in a more conservative test of hypothesis three and reduced the likelihood of finding support for it. Of the content (3,167 units) not coded as neutral, those units coded as community consensus were almost twice as likely to occur. Consensus paragraphs accounted for 22.0 percent of overall content (2,036 units) compared to 12.3 percent (1,131 units) for conflict coverage. (See appendix F.) In light of this relationship, hypothesis three is accepted. Further analysis of content by type offers additional insight into how the issue is portrayed in terms of conflict and consensus and supports the validity of this element of the study. Local news stories approximated the overall pattern of coverage with a slight increase in neutral content and were more than twice as likely to cover the issue as a matter of consensus rather then conflict. News wire coverage provided a significantly higher percentage of neutral coverage but still portrayed the issue as a point of consensus almost twice as often. Editorials largely took the form of endorsements or congratulations to the community after selection. Consistent with that observation, editorials were found to convey a consensus focus six times as often as conflict. The only category of content that exhibited more conflict than consensus surrounding the prison issue was letters to the editor. (See appendix G.) The pattern of coverage with respect to consensus is consistent with previous research that found that local coverage downplayed contentious aspects of an issue to portray it as a focal point for community consensus. Tichenor, Donohue and Olien (1980) related this, once again, to the local newspaper's distributive function. H3: Structural pluralism. Previous studies found a relationship between community structural pluralism and the extent of conflict coverage. In testing this hypothesis, the community structural pluralism indices were applied and the relationship was tested against the percentage of content coded as related to conflict coverage. The direction of content was also used in this analysis as an indication of content diversity. (See appendix H.) While direction and consensus are separate issues, both relate to the context in which the newspapers presented the issue to their readers. The analysis provided mixed results. (See appendix I.) Moderate positive correlations were found for both negative direction and conflict coverage. For direction, significant correlations were identified for all three population indices, with the county figure yielding the strongest relationship. The percentage of those employed in non-agrarian jobs also indicated a moderate positive correlation. Use of the percentage of county residents holding a bachelor's degree did not prove a useful indicator. These correlations suggest that newspapers in communities having a higher degree of pluralism were more likely to present a balanced view of the prison issue in terms of positive versus negative direction. The coefficient of determination (r2 values) for the relationship between direction of coverage and community structural pluralism indices ranged from 0.16 to 0.44, depending on the indicator applied. The same pattern held for conflict coverage, though the correlations were slightly weaker and only held for two pluralism indicators. (See appendix I.) Moderate positive correlations were indicated in the case of county and newspaper community populations. While a correlation was indicated between the prison community population and proportion of conflict coverage, the correlation was weak and failed to achieve the p < .05 level of significance. The remaining pluralism indicators for levels of education and employment also failed to indicate a significant relationship. The lack of correlation across these three indices may be explained, in part by the limited variance in the sample. The correlations identified in this portion of the analysis suggest that newspapers in more pluralistic communities, at least those with larger populations, were more likely to provide balanced coverage of the prison issue in terms of community conflict and consensus. Significant correlations for conflict coverage yielded r2 values in the 0.20 to 0.33 range. Although the results suggested by the various pluralism indices were mixed, there was sufficient evidence to support acceptance of hypothesis three. H4: Conflict coverage over time. The prediction of increased conflict coverage is intended to test past findings for their external validity over time. The assumption was that social and mass media changes would result in an increasing proportion of conflict coverage in more recent coverage. As with hypothesis three, both the proportions of conflict units and negative direction units to overall coverage were analyzed. The data did not support hypothesis three and it was rejected. No correlation was indicated for either conflict coverage or negative direction, suggesting that there has been little change in either aspect of coverage over time (See appendix J.) This suggests that the concerns of Tichenor, Donohue and Olien have not been realized, at least in the context of the communities and prison issue addressed in this study. A plausible explanation may well be that the trends causing concern had not reached those communities or that the period of time has not resulted in measurable change. Conclusion Discussion. As a replication of prior research by Tichenor, Donohue and Olien, this study tested their earlier findings regarding the role of local newspapers in community conflict. The results of the study provided strong evidence in validation of past findings with regard to the role of the community newspaper in conflict situations. In the first hypothesis tested, content analysis of initial coverage of the prison issue at the community level provided clear support for previous observations that newspapers serve a largely distributive information role, reporting or endorsing decisions already taken by local elites. Several communities were found to be exceptions to this pattern but provided additional support in their consistency with the underlying concepts of Tichenor, Donohue and Olien's model. Consistent with previous findings of the Minnesota research team, patterns of newspaper coverage analyzed in this study found newspapers more likely to portray the prison issue in a positive light and as a focus of community consensus. Furthermore, the newspapers continued to serve a distributive information role far beyond initial coverage, extending this maintenance function through the entire prison site-selection process. Also consistent with the conclusions of Tichenor, Donohue and Olien were the moderate correlations found between content diversity and community structural pluralism. There was evidence that newspapers serving more pluralistic communities were more likely to present greater content diversity and more conflict coverage with local population figures serving as the most consistent pluralism indicator. This relationship can be explained in the context of a mixed community power model in which the dominant power structure in more complex communities splits into multiple competing power centers resulting in greater diversity of opinion and a higher likelihood of conflict (Schulze, 1957; Woods, 1998). The final hypothesis of this study addressed the concerns of Tichenor, Donohue and Olien (1980) that changes in community identity and autonomy coupled with alterations in the mass media industry would modify the patterns they had previously identified in local news and editorial content, including an increase in conflict coverage and content diversity over time. No significant correlation between the year of publication and the levels of conflict coverage and content diversity was found to support these concerns. Limitations. Although this study was ambitious in its attempt to conduct a census of coverage related to the prison issue, the resulting sample remains purposive. Only communities successful in their bid for site selection were analyzed, resulting in an identifiable sample that fit the purpose of the study. While the findings of this study are consistent with previous findings, the external validity of the study is weakened by the sample selection and one should be cautious in generalizing the results of this study to other samples or issues. A concern common to all studies using content analysis is the potential for coding categories to reflect the researcher's biases. To address this, particular care was taken to incorporate definitions from previous research where available. Where areas of potential bias were identified, the more conservative definition or coding procedure was applied. These efforts to ensure reliability while strengthening internal validity introduce a threat to external validity. Riffe, Lacy and Fico (1998) raised this potential weakness of content analysis, noting that the meanings derived from content by trained coders formally evaluating content may be far different from those developed by the typical reader. Future research. Several avenues for future research are suggested by the limitations sited previously. Further replications using other samples and issues are appropriate to build support and further define the model of local newspapers and their social-control function in communities. Implications. This study leads to the conclusion that the community newspaper is an agent of social control and that it serves the interests of those in power. This validation may be reassuring from the theoretical perspective of validating Tichenor, Donohue and Olien's previous findings regarding the social control function of the community newspapers, but this provides further evidence undermining our traditional ideal of an independent local press. REFERENCES Altschull, J. H. (1995). Agents of power: The media and public policy (2nd Ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers. Banfield, E. C., & Wilson, J. Q. (1963). City politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and MIT Press. Breed, W. (1955, May). Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis. Social Forces, 33 (4), 326-335. Breed, W. (1958, December). Mass communication and social-cultural integration. Social Forces, 37 (2), 109-116. Byerly, K. (1961). Community journalism. Philadelphia: Chilton Publishers. Carey, J. W. (1979). Foreword. In H. Hardt (Ed.), Social theories of the press: Early German and American perspectives. Beverly Hills,CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Carlson, K. A. (1988). Understanding community opposition to prison siting: more than fear and finances. Corrections Today, 50 (4), 84-90. Carlson, K. A. (1990, June). Prison escapes and community consequences: Results of a case study. Federal Probation, 49 (2), 36-42. Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Dahl, R. A. (1982). Dilemmas of a pluralist democracy. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press. Davidson, W. B., & Cotter, P. R. (1997, April). Psychological sense of community and newspaper readership. Psychological Reports, 80 (2), 659-666. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Denver: Alan Swallow. Domhoff, G. W. (1998). Who rules America: Power and politics in the year 2000 (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company. Donohue, G. A., Olien, C. N., & Tichenor. P. J. (1985, Fall). Reporting conflict by pluralism, newspaper type and ownership. Journalism Quarterly, 62 (3), 489-499. Donohue, G. A., Tichenor. P. J., & Olien, C. N. (1973, Winter). Mass media functions, knowledge and social control. Journalism Quarterly, 50 (4), 652-659. Donohue, G. A., Tichenor, P. J., & Olien, C. N. (1995, Spring). A guard dog perspective of the media. Journal of Communication, 45 (2), 115-132. Edelstein, A. S., & Larson, O. N. (1960, Autumn). The weekly press' contribution to a sense of urban community. Journalism Quarterly, 37 (4), 489-498. Edelstein, A. S., & Schulz, B. (1963). The weekly newspaper's leadership role as seen by community leaders. Journalism Quarterly, 40 (3), 565-574. Fitzgerald, M. (1996, Nov. 23). Building newspapers and communities: 1996 National Newspaper Association. Editor & Publisher, 129 (47), 26-27. Galbraith, J. K. (1983). The anatomy of power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Gamson, W. A. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood, IL.: Dorsey Press. Gaziano, C. & McGrath, C. (1987, Summer-Autumn). Newspaper credibility and relationships of newspaper journalists to communities. Journalism Quarterly, 64(2-3), 317-328, +345. Gibbons, S. G. & Pierce, G. L. (1995). Politics and prison development in a rural area. The Prison Journal, (75), 3, 380-389. Hallinan, J. T. (2001). Going up the river: Travels in a prison nation. New York: Random House. Hindman, D. B. (1996, Autumn). Community newspapers, community structural pluralism, and local conflict with nonlocal groups. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(3), 708-721. Hindman, D. B., Ernst, S., & Richardson, M. (2001). The rural-urban gap in community newspaper editors' use of information technologies. Mass Communication and Society, 4 (2), 149-164. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Illinois' prison population falls as nation's rises. (2003, July 28). Associated Press. Janowitz, M. (1967). The community press in an urban setting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Janowitz, M. (1975). Sociological theory and social control. American Journal of Sociology. 81 (1), 82-106. Janowitz, M. (1978). The intellectual history of "social control." In J. S. Roucek (Ed.), Social Control for the 1980's: A Handbook for Order in a Democratic Society (pp. 20-45). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Janowitz, M. (1991). On social organization and social control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kaniss, P. (1991). Making local news. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kennedy, B. M. (1974). Community journalism: A way of life. Iowa State University Press: Ames. Krause, J. D. (1992). The effects of prison siting practices on community status arrangements: a framework applied to the siting of California prisons. Crime & Delinquency, 38 (1), 27-55. Lacy, S., & Riffe, D. (1996, Winter). Sampling error and selecting intercoder reliability samples for nominal content categories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73 (4), 963-973. Lasswell, H. D. (1949). The structure and function of communication in society. In W. Schramm, (Ed.), Mass Communications (pp. 102-115). Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Martindale, D. (1978). The theory of social control. In J. S. Roucek (Ed.). Social Control for the 1980's: A Handbook for Order in a Democratic Society (pp. 46-58). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. McCombs, M. (1997). Building consensus: the news media's agenda-setting roles. Political Communication, 14, 433-443. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-185. McFarland, R. (1999). Bacon's newspaper directory 2000 (48th ed.). Chicago: Bacon's Information, Inc. Merton, R. K. (1949). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. Mott, P. E. (1970). Power, authority and influence. In M.T. Aiken & P.E. Mott, (Eds.). The structure of community power (pp. 3-16). New York: Random House. Olien, C. N., Donohue, G. A., & Tichenor. P. J. (1968, Summer). The community editor's power and the reporting of conflict. Journalism Quarterly, 45 (2), 243-252. Park, R. E. (1925). The natural history of the newspaper. In R.E. Park, E. W. Burgess & R. D. McKenzie, (Eds.). The city (pp. 8-22). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Park, R. E. (1929). Urbanization as measured by newspaper circulation. American Journal of Sociology. 25, 60-79. Popper, F. J. (1981, April). Siting LULUs. Planning, 4, 12-15. Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Roucek, J. S. (Ed.). (1978). Social control for the 1980's: A handbook for order in a democratic society. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Schlosser, E. (1998, December). The prison-industrial complex. The Atlantic Monthly, 51-77. Schulze, R. O. (1957). The role of economic dominants in community power structure. In M. Aiken & P. E. Mott (Eds.), The structure of community power (pp. 31-45). New York: Random House. Shichor, D. (1992). Myths and realities in prison siting. Crime & Delinquency, 38 (1), 70-87. Shoemaker, P., & Reese, S. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influence on mass media content. New York: Longman. Sneed, D., & Riffe, D. (1991). The publisher—public official: Real or imagined conflict of interest? New York: Preaeger.Spies, S., Murdock, S. H., White, S., Krannich, R., Wulfhorst, J. D., Wrigley, K., Leistritz, F. L., Sell, R., & Thompson, J. (1998, March). Support for waste facility siting: Differences between community leaders and residents. Rural Sociology, 63 (1), 65-93. Stone, C. N. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. Sumner, C. (1997). Social control: The history and politics of a central concept in Anglo-American sociology. In R. Bergalli & C. Sumner (Eds.). Social control and political order : European perspectives at the end of the century (pp. 1-33). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage. Takahashi, L. M., & Graber, S. L. (1998). Controversial facility siting in the urban environment: Resident and planner perceptions in the United States. Environment and Behavior. 30 (2), 184-216. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159-170. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1980). Community conflict and the press. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: a study in the construction of reality. New York: The Free Press. U.S. Department of Commerce (1992, June). 1990 Census of Population and Housing: Social and Economic Characteristics for Illinois (1990 CPH-2-15, Section 1 of 2). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing. U.S. Department of Commerce (1993, September). 1990 Census of Population and Housing: Summary of Social, Economic, and Housing Characteristics for Illinois (1990 CPH-5-15). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing. Viswanath, K., & Arora, P. (2000, Winter). Ethnic media in the United States: An essay on their role in integration, assimilation, and social control. Mass Communication & Society, 3 (1), 39-56. Warren, R. L. (1978). The community in America (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Webster, J. (1987, Fall/Winter). The publisher and civic activity: Civic activism dilemma. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 2 (1), 41-47. Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2003). Mass Media Research: An Introduction (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. Woods, M. (1998, December). Rethinking elites: Networks, space and local politics. Environment and Planning, 30 (12), 2101-2119. Appendix A: Community Newspapers--Dailies Community Pop. Title Circulation Canton 13,922 Daily Ledger (e) 5,706 Centralia 14,274 Centralia Sentinel (e)14,145 (S) 14,145 Danville 33,828 Commercial-News (e)18,695 (S) 20,345 Decatur 88,885 Herald & Review (m)38,035 (S) 46,947 Dixon 15,144 The Telegraph (e) 9,100 East Moline 20,147 The Dispatch (e) 27,870 (S) 34,673 (Moline) (43,080) East St. Louis 40,944 News-Democrat (m)51,920 (S) 62,279 (Belleville) (42,806) Galesburg 33,530 Register-Mail (e) 17,300 (S) 16,800 Grayville 2,043 The Carmi Times (e) 2,970 (Carmi) (5,626) Harrisburg 9,289 Daily Register (e) 4,808 Hopkins Park 601 Daily Journal (e) 26,961 (S) 32,008 (Kankakee) (27,541) Jacksonville 19,324 Journal-Courier (m)14,597 (S) 14,403 Kewanee 12,969 Star Courier (e) 6,365 Ina 489 Register-News (e) 10,500 (Mount Vernon) (16,988) Robinson 6,740 Robinson Daily News (e) 6,528 Taylorville 11,133 Breeze Courier (e) 6,700 (S) 6,700 (McFarland, 1999) Community Newspapers –Weeklies/Semiweeklies Community Pop. Title Circulation Hillsboro 4,400 Hillsboro Journal (M/Th) 6,164 Mount Sterling 1,922 Brown County (Tu) 2,700 Democrat-Message Murphysboro 9,176 Murphysboro American (M/Th) 11,565 Pinckneyville 3,372 Democrat (W/Th) 3,000 Rushville 3,212 The Rushville Times (W) 3,500 Sumner 1,083 The Sumner Press (W) 2,150 Savanna 3,819 Northwestern Ill. Dispatch (W) 8,250 Tamms 750 Gazette Democrat (Th) 5,200 (Anna) (4,850) (McFarland, 1999) Appendix B: Intercoder/Intracoder Reliability Variable category Percent intercoder agreement Percent intracoder agreement Decided/undecided 87.1 94.9 Direction 79.4 82.2 Consensus/conflict 80.4 83.4 Appendix C: Community Structural Pluralism Indices Community (Newspaper Community) Community Population County County Population 1% Non-Ag. Workforce % with bachelors degrees State of Illinois 11,430,602 98.2 21.0 Canton 13,907 Fulton 38,080 93.7 9.5 Centralia 14,270 Marion 41,561 97.0 9.6 Danville 33,828 Vermillion 88,257 97.1 11.1 Decatur 83,885 Macon 117,206 98.2 14.8 Dixon 15,144 Lee 34,392 94.1 11.8 East Moline (Moline) 20,147 (43,202) Rock Island 148,723 98.4 15.0 East St. Louis (Belleville) 40,944 (42,705) St. Clair 262,852 98.7 14.7 Galesburg 33,530 Knox 56,393 95.3 12.7 Grayville (Carmi) 1,399 (5,564) White 16,522 93.1 9.5 Harrisburg 9,289 Saline 26,551 96.1 9.4 Hillsboro 4,400 Montgomery 30,728 92.7 8.1 Hopkins Park (Kankakee) 572 (27,575) Kankakee 96,255 97.4 11.9 Ina (Mount Vernon) 462 (16,988) Jefferson 37,020 94.4 11.3 Jacksonville 19,324 Morgan 36,397 94.8 16.0 Community (Newspaper Community) Community Population County County Population 1 % Non-Ag. Workforce % with bachelors degrees Kewanee 12,969 Henry 51,159 92.9 11.8 Mount Sterling 1,933 Brown 5,836 85.7 9.8 Murphysboro 9,176 Jackson 61,067 97.0 29.5 Pinckneyville 3,327 Perry 21,412 96.8 7.3 Robinson 6,740 Crawford 19,464 93.0 9.5 Rushville 3,229 Schuyler 7,498 84.3 10.7 2Savanna 3,819 Carroll Jo Daviess (Averages) 16,805 21,821 (19,313) 88.6 89.5 (89.1) 10.6 12.1 (11.4) Sumner 1,083 Lawrence 15,972 92.0 6.3 2Tamms (Anna) 761 (4,805) Alexander Union (Averages) 10,626 17,619 (14,123) 95.6 93.9 (94.5) 7.8 10.9 (9.8) Taylorville 11,133 Christian 34,418 94.3 9.3 Notes: 1 % of non-agrarian workforce is defined as the percentage of the county workforce not employed in agriculture, forestry or fisheries positions. 2 Communities involve two counties in the site-selection process. Parenthetical values were used as indices for these communities. Population figure represents average of two county population figures. Workforce and education figures represent weighted averages of combined counties. (U.S. Department of Commerce, 1992,1993) Appendix D: Distribution of Data by Type of Content Types of content Articles/items Paragraphs Ave. paragraphs News-local 557 (62.1%) 8,215 (74.7%) 14.7 News-wire 30 ( 3.3%) 438 ( 4.0%) 24.3 Editorials 112 (12.5%) 1,080 ( 9.8%) 9.6 Letters to the editor 180 (20.1%) 1,068 ( 9.7%) 5.9 Op-Ed pieces/ columns 18 ( 2.0%) 195 ( 1.8%) 10.8 Total 897 (100%) 10,996 (100%) 12.3 Appendix E: Distribution of Initial Coverage by Decision Status Frames Total units of analysis Percent of total units Percent of relevant unitsa Decided 121 26.9% 38.7% Neutral 170 37.8% 54.3% Undecided 22 4.9% 7.0% Unrelated 137 30.4% Total 450 100% 100% a The term, relevant units, refers to the total number of coded paragraphs (450) minus those paragraphs coded as unrelated (137). Relevant units totaled 313 paragraphs. Appendix F: Distribution of Content by Conflict Versus Consensus Category Frequency Percentage of relevant paragraphs Consensus 2,036 22.0% Neutral 6,068 65.7% Conflict 1,131 12.3% Total 9,235 100% Appendix G: Conflict Versus Consensus by Content Type Content type (Relevant Units) Consensus Neutral Conflict News-local (6,904) 1,484 (21.5%) 4,744 (68.7%) 676 ( 9.8%) News-wire (402) 29 ( 7.2%) 358 (89.1%) 15 ( 3.7%) Editorials (902) 326 (36.1%) 524 (58.1%) 52 ( 5.8%) Op-Ed/columns (158) 31 (19.6%) 110 (69.6%) 17 (10.8%) Letters to the editor (869) 166 (19.1%) 332 (38.2%) 371 (42.7%) Totals (9,235) 2,036 (22.0%) 6,068 (65.7%) 1,131 (12.3%) Appendix H: Distribution of Content by Direction Category Frequency Percentage of relevant paragraphs Positive 4,626 50.1% Neutral 3,866 41.9% Negative 743 8.0% Total 9,235 100% Appendix I: Correlation Matrix for Pluralism Indices and Proportion of Conflict Coverage Pluralism indices Negative direction Conflict coverage Community population 0.479* 0.341 Media community population 0.510* 0.448* County population 0.669* 0.583* Percent with bachelor's degree 0.063 0.046 Percent employed in non-agriculture/forestry/fishing 0.406* 0.215 * p < .05 Appendix J: Correlation Matrix for Direction of Coverage and Proportion of Conflict Coverage by Year Negative Direction Conflict coverage Year of coverage -0.145 0.057 Note: Statistical significance not indicated. No p values < .05. [1] Copies of the coding protocols and the coding sheets used in the study are available from the author on request.