|
Women as global newsmakers and correspondents Women as global newsmakers and correspondents Does press freedom matter? The role of women in the news -- both as correspondent and as newsmakers -- is a rich and enduring source of debate, discussion, and scholarly research.[1] Indeed, the debate cuts across media, continents, and issues. Studies often seek to explore the adequacy and extent of coverage about women, and the recent record in that regard appears mixed. Coverage of the United Nations' Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995, for example, has been criticized for focusing not on the substance of the proceedings but on peripheral issues such as difficulties in obtaining visas.[2] Other analyses suggested, however, that the conference was "adequately covered" given restrictions imposed by China.[3] Another example of an apparently mixed record can be found in the year-to-year comparative analyses of women cited in front page stories in twenty newspapers in the United States. Declines from the year before were reported in 1995 and 1996;[4] however, from 1989 to 1994, women mentioned in front page reports had more than doubled.[5] The wide-ranging and at times contradictory discussions about women as correspondents and newsmakers was among the issues in international communication that helped give rise to an ambitious and collaborative multinational analysis of the nature and variety of foreign and international news in the closing years of the twentieth century. This collaborative analysis, the Cooperative Study of Foreign News and International News Flow in the 1990s, was organized by communication scholars in Britain and the United States, and included contributors from Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and Oceania and the Pacific Rim. The International News Flow Study was intended to expand upon earlier investigations, notably the 1978 UNESCO Foreign Images study,[6] and to produce an up-to-date, detailed portrait of international news and the flow of global news. The quantitative centerpiece of the International News Flow Study was a content analysis of more than 48,000 foreign and international news reports, published or broadcast in nearly forty countries during two weeks in September 1995. The first week of the study coincided with the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing.[7] Coding for the International News Flow Study was conducted largely by national teams who were asked to select and code at least three domestic media -- the country's most influential newspaper, another leading national or regional newspaper, and a television or radio reaching the country's largest audience.[8] Participants were to code the entire newspaper and newscast, searching for reports that contained clear foreign or international elements. In other words, reports carrying a foreign dateline were to be included in the analysis, as were stories that originated under a domestic dateline but containing international content. Participants were not to code reports containing only passing or minor reference to other countries, such as a story discussing domestic economic issues that referred to foreign currency exchange rates.[9] The reports were analyzed individually for the following elements: dateline, length, source, topic, country or countries cited most prominently, and various aspects about the news event (such as whether it was about a disruptive event). The gender of correspondents and the gender of principal newsmakers, or "actors," in each report also were coded. In instances where the gender of correspondent or actor was unclear from the report, coders were instructed to enter "cannot tell." In cases where female and male correspondents shared the byline or jointly filed the broadcast report, coders were to enter "both."[10] The content analysis covered a variety of newspapers, including such prominent or widely-circulating titles as Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in Germany, Asahi Shimbun in Japan, Izvestia in Russia, and the New York Times in the United States, as well as titles with smaller circulations such as Golos Armenii in Armenia, the Observer in the Gambia, Republika in Indonesia, Maariv in Israel, and Sud Quotidien in Senegal. Broadcast media included such voices as the BBC, CNN, Estonian TV, Mega Channel in Greece, NHK television in Japan, Radio Nigeria, and the South African Broadcasting Corporation. This paper -- among the first submitted for peer review that analyzes data collected in International News Flow Study -- examines the role of women as newsmakers and as correspondents. Specifically, the paper is guided by these questions: (1) To what extent do women figure as the principal newsmakers in foreign and international news? (2) To what extent are female correspondents reporting foreign and international news? In addition, this paper seeks to examine differentiation in the role of women as newsmakers and correspondents. That is, do women figure more prominently as newsmakers and correspondents in countries where the media are comparatively free of government and other controls? And, are women more likely to appear as newsmakers and correspondents in print or broadcast media? This paper, to be sure, does not purport to answers conclusively such intriguing questions. While extensive, the sample of countries in the International News Flow Study's content analysis is neither comprehensive nor random, and the capacity to generalize from the data may be limited. Nonetheless, the scope and design of the International News Flow Study is such that it can offer fresh and revealing insight into long-debated issues of the role of women as newsmakers and correspondents in foreign and international news. Method Units of analysis in this study were individual print and broadcast media in the September 1995 content analysis. This study included 131 media from 36 countries.[11] Aspects of each medium (print or broadcast) and of each country (comparative degree of press freedom[12]) were as independent variables in this study. Measures of media content -- the percentage of international and foreign news stories in which women were identified as correspondents, and the percentage of such reports in which women were identified as the main newsmaker or "actor" -- were dependent variables. The percentages were derived from cases in which the gender of correspondent and the gender of main actor were coded. In most reports in the International News Flow Study, correspondent gender either was not given or could not be determined. While the gender of the principal newsmaker was more readily determined, it was either not given or not clear in many thousands of reports coded. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess relationships among the variables. A covariate, the United Nations' Human Development Index,[13] was incorporated into the ANOVA routine. Results The content analysis of the International News Flow Study indicates that women have a fairly modest role, overall, in making and reporting foreign and international news. Men clearly are the principal correspondents and principal newsmakers. As Table 1 indicates, fewer than 10 percent of the correspondents and main news figures in foreign and international news are women. [Table 1 about here.] [Table 2 about here.] Such a portrait, however, can be differentiated in revealing ways. Women are significantly more likely to appear as principal newsmakers in foreign and international reports in countries where media are "free" than they are in countries with "partly free" or "not free" media, as Tables 3 and 4 show. Media type -- print or broadcast -- is not a significant variable in that relationship. [Table 3 about here.] [Table 4 about here.] Incorporating the Human Development Index as a covariate in the ANOVA routine does not significantly alter the relationship, as Tables 5 and 6 show. Level of press freedom is significant; media type is not. [Table 5 about here.] [Table 6 about here.] Women reporting about foreign and international news are more likely to work for broadcast outlets than newspapers, as Table 7 and 8 indicate. The national level of press freedom is not significant in that relationship. [Table 7 about here.] [Table 8 about here.] Interestingly, that relationship appears to be little altered when a women is the principal newsmaker. Table 9 shows the relationship among variables when "female actor" is added as a covariate in the ANOVA. [Table 9 about here.] Incorporating the Human Development Index as a covariate does not significantly alter the relationships of women as correspondents, as Tables 10 and 11 indicate. Type of media is still significant to the relationship; level of press freedom is not. [Table 10 about here.] [Table 11 about here.] Discussion and conclusions The International News Flow Study of leading global print and broadcast media offers several revealing insights into the role and status of women as correspondents and as newsmakers in foreign and international news. Results of this paper indicate that: y women are dramatically overshadowed by men as makers and reporters of foreign and international news. The result is particularly interesting, given that the International News Flow Study's content analysis coincided with the opening sessions of the United Nations' Fourth World Conference on Women, which commanded considerable attention from international news-gathering organizations. The result also challenges anecdotal reports suggesting that women may be gaining enhanced profiles in reporting international news.[14] y women are more likely to appear as principal newsmakers in foreign and international coverage in those countries where political, economic, and legal controls on the media are comparatively few. That is, women are more likely to appear as main news figures in "free" media systems. Such a finding is partly attributable, perhaps, to the comparatively high proportion of women in national legislatures in northern and western European countries,[15] where media systems also are ranked "free." Relatively elevated levels of political empowerment doubtless contributes to the role of women as newsmakers. In any case, that open media systems appear most receptive to female newsmakers stands as this paper's most intriguing result. y women covering foreign and international news are more likely to report for broadcast outlets than for newspapers.[16] The results also suggest that women were more likely to report for broadcast outlets regardless of the relative degree of national media freedom, although those findings were not statistically significant. Interestingly, the Human Development Index was not found to be a significant influencing variable for either women as international newsmakers or as correspondents. One might have speculated that higher measures of human development would correlate to enhanced roles for women making or covering the news. A derivative of the Human Development Index is the Gender-Related Development Index and its statistical cousin, the Gender Empowerment Measure. The indexes, both of which are compiled by the United Nations' Development Program,[17] were not included in this analysis because they are not calculated for all countries. The Gender Empowerment Measure, in particular, is missing for many developing countries.[18] The incomplete data quite would have likely distorted results. The indexes are nonetheless cited here in that they may represent intriguing possibilities for expanding comparative research into the roles of women as makers and reporters of foreign and international news. Tables Table 1. Correspondent gender. Gender Percent Female 8.4 Male 28.1 Shared byline/Joint report 0.4 Not given/cannot tell 63.0 N=48,209 Table 2. Gender of main actor (principal newsmaker) Gender Percent Female 8.4 Male 50.6 Both as "main actor" 2.2 Not given/cannot tell 38.8 N=48,136 Table 3. Cell means. Women as principal news figure ("main actor") in foreign and international news, by media type and comparative level of press freedom. Total population. 16.98 Media type. Print Broadcast 17.65 15.98 Press freedom Free Partly free Not free 18.94 15.01 12.49 Media Type Print Broadcast Press freedom Free 19.40 18.73 Partly Free 16.58 11.19 Not Free 13.03 11.81 Table 4. ANOVA summary table. Experimental sums of squares. Sum of squares df Mean Square F Significance of F Correlations Main effects 878.721 3 292.907 6.096 .001 Press freedom 796.759 2 398.380 8.291 .000 B=.35* Media type 118.643 1 118.643 2.469 .119 B=.14* 2-way interactions 92.505 92.505 2 2 46.253 46.253 .963 .963 .385 .385 Explained 971.226 5 194.245 4.043 .002 Residual 5525.519 115 48.048 Total 6496.746 120 54.140 R2=.368 *adjusted for other elements in model Table 5. Cell means. Women as principal news figure, by media type and comparative level of press freedom. Human Development Index as covariate Total population. 16.99 Media type. Print Broadcast 17.79 15.82 Press freedom Free Partly free Not free 18.94 14.86 12.49 Media Type Print Broadcast Press freedom Free 19.40 18.37 Partly Free 16.94 9.68 Not Free 13.03 11.81 Table 6. ANOVA summary table. Experimental sums of squares. Covariate HDI entered with main effects. Sum of squares df Mean Square F Significance of F Correlations Main effects 919.349 4 229.837 4.788 .001 Press freedom 360.667 2 180.333 3.757 .026 B=.34* Media type 153.441 1 153.441 3.197 .077 B=.16* HDI (covar) .989 1 .989 .021 .886 r=.001 2-way interactions 173.875 173.875 2 2 86.938 86.938 1.811 1.811 .168 .168 Explained 1093.225 6 182.204 3.796 .002 Residual 5327.963 111 48.000 Total 6421.188 117 54.882 R2=.378 *adjusted for other elements in model Table 7. Cell means. Women as correspondents in foreign and international news, by media type and comparative level of press freedom. Total population. 28.13 Media type. Print Broadcast 23.35 35.31 Press freedom Free Partly free Not free 27.00 29.44 30.34 Media Type Print Broadcast Press freedom Free 22.40 32.94 Partly Free 25.70 38.58 Not Free 21.94 40.84 Table 8. ANOVA summary table. Experimental sums of squares. Sum of squares df Mean Square F Significance of F Correlations Main effect 4564.951 3 1521.650 5.990 .001 Press freedom 443.152 2 221.576 .872 .421 B=.12* Media type 4333.336 1 4333.336 17.059 .000 B=.36* 2-way interactions 249.924 249.924 2 2 124.962 124.962 .492 .492 .613 .613 Explained 4814.875 5 962.975 3.791 .003 Residual 28958.689 114 254.024 Total 33773.563 119 283.811 R2=.368 *adjusted for other elements in model Table 9. ANOVA summary table. Experimental sums of squares. Covariate "female actor" entered with main effects. Sum of squares df Mean Square F Significance of F Correlations Main effect 5227.802 4 1306.950 5.226 .001 Press freedom 815.801 2 407.901 1.631 .200 B=.17* Media type 4707.421 1 4707.421 18.822 .000 B=.38* Covariate 662.851 1 662.851 2.650 .106 r=.347 2-way interactions 284.898 284.898 2 2 142.449 142.449 .590 .590 .567 .567 Explained 5512.699 6 918.783 3.674 .002 Residual 28260.864 113 250.096 Total 33773.563 119 283.811 R2=.155 *adjusted for other elements in model Table 10. Cell means. Women as correspondents by media type and press freedom. Covariate HDI. Total population. 27.57 Media type. Print Broadcast 23.30 33.93 Press freedom Free Partly free Not free 27.00 27.25 30.34 Media Type Print Broadcast Press freedom Free 22.40 32.94 Partly Free 25.79 30.90 Not Free 21.94 40.84 Table 11. ANOVA summary table. Experimental sums of squares. Covariate HDI entered with main effects. Sum of squares df Mean Square F Significance of F Correlations Main effect 3361.688 4 840.422 3.783 .006 Press freedom 107.486 2 53.743 .242 .786 B=.12* Media type 3118.883 1 3118.883 14.039 .000 B=.36* HDI 1.487 1 1.487 .007 .935 R=.001 2-way interactions 484.150 484.150 2 2 242.075 242.075 1.090 1.090 .340 .340 Explained 3845.838 6 640.973 2.885 .012 Residual 24437.985 110 222.163 Total 28283.823 116 243.826 R2=.345 *adjusted for other elements in model [1] Endnotes See, among others, Maurine H. Beasley and Shelia J. Gibbons, Taking Their Place: A Documentary History of Women and Journalism (Washington, D.C.: American University Press, 1993); Kay Mills, A Place in the News: From the Women's Pages to the Front Page (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990); Pamela J. Creedon, ed., Women in Mass Communication: Challenging Gender Values (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989); and Julia Edwards, Women of the World: The Great Foreign Correspondents (New York: Ivy Books, 1988). [2] See, for example, "Coverage of Beijing '95: 'We were airbrushed out of the picture,'" Media Report to Women 24, 1 (winter 1996): 1-4. [3] "Frustrated news media persevered to cover world conference, NGO Forum in Beijing," Media Report to Women 23, 4 (fall 1995): 1-3. [4] "Women and Media," WIN News 22, 3 (summer 1996): 49, and "Slipping from the Scene: front-page coverage of women declines," Media Report to Women 23, 2 (spring 1995): 2-4. [5] Debra Gersh Hernandez. "Good and the bad about women's news in newspapers," Editor and Publisher 127, 21 (21 May 1994); 17-19. [6] See Robert L. Stevenson and Donald L. Shaw, eds., Foreign News and the New World Information Order (Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1984). [7] The content analysis included these dates: Sunday, September 3, through Saturday, September 9, and Sunday, September 17, and Saturday, September 23, 1995. The data collection and compilation is virtually complete, although it is still underway for a few countries, such as Brazil and China. [8] In some cases -- such as Benin, Cote d'Ivoire, Gambia, and Senegal -- fewer than three media were available to coders. [9] "Project Proposal -- Cooperative Study of Foreign News and International News Flow in the 1990s," 3-4. [10] "Project Proposal -- Cooperative Study of Foreign News and International News Flow in the 1990s," 6. [11] The countries were: Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Benin, Bulgaria, Cote d'Ivoire, Cuba, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, the Gambia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Portugal, Russia, Senegal, Slovenia, Spain, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Venezuela. [12] The 1995 comparative ratings of press freedom, compiled by Freedom House, were applied here. Countries are ranked in the Freedom House ratings as "free," "partly free," or "not free." Freedom House, which is based in New York City, says its ratings are derived from analysis of political and economic pressures on national news media, legal restrictions on national news flow, and incidents of harassment, intimidation, and jailing of journalists. See Leonard R. Sussman, "The Press: Pressed and Oppressed," Freedom House [13] The Human Development Index is compiled by the UN Development Program from indices measuring life expectancy at birth, literacy and educational attainment, and inflation-adjusted gross domestic product per capita. See, "Computing the Human Development Index," Human Development Report (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), 106 [14] See, "Women are laying claim to international reporting beats," Media Report to Women 25, 1 (winter 1997): 5-6. [15] For example, women hold 39.4 percent of the seats in Norway's national legislature, 33.5 percent in Finland's, 25.5 percent in Germany's, and 23.2 percent in Austria's. (The share of seats women hold in the U.S. Congress is 10.4 percent.) See "Gender empowerment measure," Human Development Report 1996, 141. [16] This finding tends to contradict a narrower study of U.S. foreign correspondents conducted early in the 1990s which indicated that "[t]elevision correspondents abroad are ... less likely [than print correspondents] to be women." See Stephen Hess, International News and Foreign Correspondents (Washington: Brookings Institution, 1996), 51. [17] See, "Computing the GDI and the GEM," Human Development Report, 107 [18] See, "Table 3: Gender Empowerment Measure," Human Development Report, 142-143.
|