AEJMC Archives

AEJMC Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave AEJMC
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: AEJ 94 MindichD HIS Rise of "objectivity" in 19th century journalism
From: Elliott Parker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:AEJMC Conference Papers <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Sat, 2 Mar 1996 07:11:27 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (588 lines)


DAVID T. Z. MINDICH
 
Ph.D Candidate, American Studies
New York University
 
740 West End Avenue #10
New York City 10025
(212) 316-9211
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
 
WORK IN PROGRESS: DISSERTATION PROJECT
 
"Building the Pyramid: The Rise of 'Objectivity' in
19th Century American Journalism"
 WORK IN PROGRESS: DISSERTATION PROJECT
 
DIVISION: HISTORY
 
"Building the Pyramid: The Rise of 'Objectivity' in
19th Century American Journalism"
 
Until the end of the nineteenth century, the discourse of storytelling
 
                nearly always took a standard form: first, an announcement of
the
 
       utility or importance of the story, followed by a chronological
 
     narration, leaving the surprise, or what Aristotle called "Reversal of
 
            the Situation," for last.  The New York Herald's 1847 news story,
 
       promising astonishment with the headline, "Terrible Flood in the West,"
 
            fits this pattern: The reporter withholds what would be the modern
 
        "lead" until the final paragraphs: a woman and her six children are
 
         missing; the flood swept away $2 million worth of property. When, as a
 
            young man in 1892, Theodore Dreiser entered the world of journalism
and
 
            the office of the Chicago Globe, his editor told him that the first
 
         paragraph of a news story must reveal "Who or what? How? When? Where?"
 
            giving away the punch line, or lead, in the first paragraph.
Between
 
           1847 and 1892 someone or someones, somehow, at sometime, somewhere,
did
 
            something to change the way newspapers tell stories.   My
dissertation
 
            examines the confluence of forces that changed news from a
chronological
 
            to an "objective" style.   I have also begun to place journalistic
 
        "objectivity" in its broad cultural context. To this end, I have divided
 
            the dissertation into seven chapters, each corresponding to a
different
 
            problem of journalistic "objectivity," presented here in four
sections.
 
 
Chapter 1: The Bull-Whipping of James Gordon Bennett and "Objectivity's"
 
            Primordial Soup
and
Chapter 2:  "Between the Bank and the Kitchen": A Non-Partisan Ethic
 
          Emerges in the "Age of Inegalitarianism."
 
Journalism historians generally place the birth of modern American
 
            journalism in the Jacksonian era and tie it to the "democratic
spirit"
 
            of the age.  Frank L. Mott calls what came before that era the "Dark
 
          Ages" of American journalism, a view shared by other historians.
Daniel
 
            Schiller agrees and sees "a pattern of objectivity," emerging in the
 
          Jacksonian era.  Michael Schudson, in Discovering the News,  claims
that
 
            the modern press emerged during the 1830s, an era he calls the "Age
of
 
            Egalitarianism."   But while Schudson and others claim that
 
 "objectivity" grew out of the era's democratic promise, evidence shows
 
            that the non-partisan ethic emerged in response to precisely
opposite
 
           factors: violence, class conflict, racial and gender subjugation, and
 
           the failure of the Jacksonian promise. While the rhetoric of
 
  "objectivity" often included words like "fairness" and "balance," the
 
           reality of the Jacksonian era and beyond was that the political
promises
 
            of egalitarianism rarely extended beyond white males.  I have
analyzed
 
            comments about "objectivity" in the abolitionist paper, the
Liberator
 
           and the penny paper, the New York Herald, and found that they often
 
         reflected the degree to which the writers themselves felt a part of the
 
            Jacksonian political promise.   James Gordon Bennett, the editor of
the
 
            successful Herald, attempted to remove "color" from the news and
placed
 
            himself firmly in the center of partisan politics. On the other
hand,
 
           William L. Garrison, the editor of the Liberator, mirrored the views
of
 
            Frederick Douglass and other abolitionists in refusing to be the
"the
 
           political partisan of any man," standing outside the political
process
 
            altogether.  Garrison's writings reveal how much of Jacksonian
discourse
 
            existed outside political boundaries.   The outsiders had little use
for
 
            a form that attempted to "balance" issues in partisan terms: there
was
 
            generally no place in the public discourse for the enfranchisement
of
 
           women, African-Americans and others.
 
 
Chapter 3: "Between the Herald's Lack of Conviction and the Tribune's
 
           Excess of it": The Wire Services and the "Extreme Center"
and
Chapter 4: The Rise of Data and Naive Empiricism
 
During this period, Horace Greeley promised his readers a "daily
 
          photograph of the world's events," the wire services began to market
 
          news "devoid of opinion,"  professional journalists' societies arose
 
          across America, and textbooks told journalism students to "chronicle,
 
           don't comment." Running contemporaneously alongside the journalists'
 
          increasing use of  "objective" notions such as "detachment" and
 
     assertions of factuality,  was a growing reliance in the social sciences
 
            on these same qualities.   In anthropology and related fields, the
rise
 
            of naive empiricism meant that professionals believed that their
world
 
            was both knowable and namable, a view that seems to have contributed
to
 
            the journalists' claim of "objectivity."  During this period, public
 
          health workers moved from a speculative profession to one which
 
     justified its claims with scientific studies and data-analysis.  In  The
 
            Cholera Years, Charles Rosenberg outlines the response to the
Cholera
 
           epidemics of  1832, 1849, and 1866.  The medical response to the
 
      epidemic evolved from the horrific "cures" of 1832, including mercury
 
           poisoning and tobacco smoke enemas, to an efficient response in the
1866
 
            epidemic. By 1866, according to Rosenberg, "statistics were becoming
the
 
            reality of science."  The journalists' increasing reliance on
"facts"
 
           during the ante-bellum period rose in tandem with the rise of
 
   statistical analysis and data gathering in the sciences.
 
 
Chapter 5
Edwin M. Stanton, Information Control, and the Inverted Pyramid
 
Historians of journalism have long sought to find the first
 
 practitioners of the "inverted pyramid" style of news writing, a style
 
            which conveys the most important information in the first paragraphs
of
 
            a story.  Conventional wisdom dates the shift from the chronological
to
 
            inverted pyramid style sometime in the late 19th century. Mitchell
 
        Stephens and others claim that the inverted pyramid form was developed
 
            by Civil War reporters "rushing to transmit their most newsworthy
 
       information over often unreliable telegraph lines." I present evidence
 
            that it was not journalists, but the War Department that was using
the
 
            form during the Civil War. Indeed, I discovered that one of the
first
 
           writers of inverted pyramids was Edwin M. Stanton, Lincoln's
Secretary
 
            of War.  Stanton has found his way into many histories of American
 
        journalism, but always because of his notoriety as a press censor. I
 
          reconcile Stanton's role as a writer of inverted pyramids with his
tight
 
            rein on discourse, journalistic and otherwise, and see Stanton's
 
      "objective" news writing style and his censorship as two related sides
 
            of Stanton's repressive social control.  There seems, of course, an
 
         irony in the suggestion that Stanton the censor may have also been a
 
          progenitor of a modern journalism.  But given recent criticism of
 
       "objectivity" by Gaye Tuchman and others, which suggests journalists'
 
           over-reliance on figures of authority, a governmental source for the
 
          inverted pyramid may be less surprising, and indeed fitting.
 
 
Chapter 6: Dana and Pulitzer: Information Confronts Story, and the
 
        Masculinity of "Objectivity."
and
Chapter 7: "A Slanderous and Nasty-Minded Mulattress": Ida B. Wells,
 
          Adolf Ochs, Lynching,
and the Rhetoric of Balance
 
By the last years of the nineteenth century, newspapers and wire
 
          services had embraced "objectivity" and the idea that reality lies
 
        between competing truth claims. But the idea that the world can be seen
 
            without human filters is, of course,  problematic.  For example, the
New
 
            York Times and other papers attempted to "balance" their coverage of
 
          lynching: on the one hand lynching is evil, on the other "Negroes are
 
           prone" to rape.  Ida B. Wells, the anti-lynching crusader, and others
 
           critiqued this equation and demonstrated that the underpinnings of
the
 
            "objective" philosophy could be flawed.  Wells' critique showed that
 
          "balance" oftentimes serves the status-quo, and in the case of
lynching,
 
            is a skewed and dangerous construction.  In return, the otherwise
staid
 
            Times wrote an editorial calling Wells unpatriotic and a "slanderous
and
 
            nasty-minded mulattress" in an attempt to discredit  her criticisms.
 
          These chapters will examine the mainstream notions of "objectivity" by
 
            entering into these battles.
 
*  *  *
 
In addition to completing my study of  its cultural context, there are
 
                two ways I am exploring the origins of and reasons for the rise
of
 
        "objectivity" in the nineteenth century. First, I have begun to read a
 
            representative number of newspapers between 1835 and 1895.  This is
not
 
            prohibitive: even the largest newspapers of the period were twelve
pages
 
            or less and only three ante-bellum dailies, the New York Tribune,
Herald
 
            , and Times,  exceeded four pages. I have already studied the entire
run
 
            of New York Herald for most of the Civil War period.  In his 1987
 
       dissertation, Harlan Stensaas conducted a content analysis of six U.S.
 
            dailies from 1865 to 1954 searching for the origins of the inverted
 
         pyramid, but his time frame was wide, forcing his study to be thin. M
 
          oreover, he does not critically examine the notion of "objectivity,"
not
 
            even putting quotes around the word.  Second, I have been exploring
the
 
            journals, letters, and memoirs of a number of journalists of the
 
      transition period.  For example, Recollections of the Civil War, by
 
         Charles A. Dana, an editor of the New York Tribune before the war, an
 
           aide to Stanton during it, and an editor and part owner of the New
York
 
            Sun after it, is an excellent source for understanding both the and
 
         press and government's role in the rise of "objectivity."
 
 
A Brief Bibliography
 
Cott, Nancy F. The Bonds of Womanhood: "Woman's Sphere" in New England. New
 
          Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.
Crouthamel, James L.  James Watson Webb, a Biography. Middletown: Wesleyan
 
         University Press,  1969.
Dana, Charles A.  Recollections of the Civil War: With the Leaders at
 
    Washington and in the Field in the Sixties. New York: Appleton, 1898.
Dana, Charles A.  The Art of Newspaper Making. New York: D. Appleton, 1895.
Entman, Robert. Democracy Without Citizens. New York: Oxford University Press,
 
            1989.
Gilje, Paul A.  The Road to Mobocracy: Popular Disorder in New York City,
 
        1783-1834. Chapel Hill, 1987.
Gramling, Oliver.  AP: The Story of News.  New York:  Farrar and Rinehart, Inc,
 
            1940.
Greenberg, Kenneth. Masters and Statesmen. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University
 
            Press, 1985.
Halttunen, Karen. Confidence Men and Painted Women : a Study of Middle-Class
 
           Culture in America, 1830-1870. New Haven : Yale University Press,
1982.
Lippmann, Walter  Public Opinion.  New York, Harcourt, Brace, 1929.
Litwack, Leon F. North of Slavery: the Negro in the Free States, 1790-1860.
 
          Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961
McFeely, William S. Frederick Douglass.  New York: Touchstone, 1991.
McPherson, James M. Ordeal by fire : the Civil War and Reconstruction. New York
 
            : Knopf  & Random House, 1982.
Mott, Frank L. American Journalism: A History 1690-1960. New York: MacMillan,
 
            1962.
Oates, Stephen. With Malice Toward None: The Life of Abraham Lincoln. New York:
 
            Harper and Row, 1977.
Pessen, Edward.  Jacksonian America: Society, Personality, and Politics.
 
        Urbana:  University of Illinois, 1985.
Richards, Leonard L. Gentlemen of Property and Standing: Anti-Abolition Mobs in
 
            Jacksonian America. London: Oxford University Press, 1971
Rosenberg, Charles.  The Cholera Years.  Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
 
            1987.
Schudson,  Michael. Discovering the News. New York: Basic Books, 1978.
Stensaas, Harlan. The Objective News Report: A Content Analysis of Selected
 
          U.S. Daily Newspapers for [sic] 1865 to 1954  Dissertation. (Ann
Arbor:
 
           University Microfilms International, 1987
Stephens, Mitchell.  A History of News: From the Drum to the Satellite. New
 
          York: Viking, 1988.
Swanberg, W. A. Citizen Hearst. New York: Collier, 1961.
Swanberg, W. A. Pulitzer. New York: Scribner, 1967.
Tucher, Andrea J.  "Froth and Scum": Truth, Beauty, Goodness, and the
 
    Axe-Murder in the First Years of the New York Penny Press. Dissertation, New
 
               York University, 1990.
Tuchman, Gaye. Making News. New York: Free Press, 1978.
Walters, Ronald G.  American Reformers: 1815-1860.  New York: Hill and Wang,
 
           1978.
Wells, Ida B. "Southern Horrors"  (A late-19th century pamphlet on lynching)
Wells, Ida B. Crusade for Justice: the Autobiography of Ida B. Wells. Chicago:
 
            University of Chicago Press, 1970.
Wilentz, Sean. Chants Democratic : New York City & the Rise of the American
 
          Working  Class, 1788-1850. New York : Oxford University Press, 1984.
 
Selected Articles
Barthes, Roland. "Structure of the Fait-Divers " in Critical Essays. Trans. by
 
            Richard Howard. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1972.
Cohen, Patricia C.  "Unregulated Youth: Masculinity and Murder in the 1830s
 
          City." Radical History Journal, Winter 1992.
Darnton, Robert.   "Writing News and Telling Stories." In Daedalus, Spring,
 
          1975.
Hackett, Robert A. "Decline of a Paradigm? Bias and Objectivity in News Media
 
            Studies."  In Critical Studies in Mass Communication. Vol. 1, number
3,
 
          September, 1984.
Nerone, John C. "The Mythology of the Penny Press" with criticism by Michael
 
           Schudson, Dan Schiller, Donald L Shaw, and John J. Pauly,  in
Critical Studies
 
                in Mass Communication, December, 1987.
Schudson, Michael "The Politics of Narrative Form: The Emergence of News
 
       Conventions in Print and Television." Daedalus, Fall 1982, vol. 3, number
4.
Shaw,  Donald L. "At the Crossroads: Change and Continuity in American Press
 
           News 1820-1860"  Journalism History, volume 8,  number 2 (Summer,
1981), 39-41.
Shaw, Donald L.  "News Bias and the Telegraph: a Study of Historical Change"
 
            Journalism Quarterly, (Spring, 1967).
Tuchman, Gaye. "Objectivity as Strategic Ritual:  An Examination of Newsmen's
 
            Notions of Objectivity." In American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 77,
No. 4,
 
             January, 1972.
 
Selected Newspapers
New York Sun, selected issues, 1832-40.
New York Herald, selected issues, 1835-95.
New York Tribune, selected issues, 1840-65.
New York Times, selected issues, 1851-95.
Harper's Weekly, 1860-65.
Freedom's Journal, selected issues, 1827-1835. The first African-American
 
        newspaper.
Daily Sentinel, selected issues, 1830s. The Sentinel was a "freethinking"
 
        radical paper of the Jacksonian era.
Liberator, 1831-40. The first major abolitionist newspaper.
Frederick Douglass's Paper and North Star, selected issues.
 
A Selection of Other Works, Consulted for Chapter 5
 
Andrews,  J. Cutler.  The North Reports The Civil War.  Pittsburgh:  University
 
            of Pittsburgh Press, 1955.
Andrews, J. Cutler.  The South Reports the Civil War. Princeton: Princeton
 
         University Press, 1970.
Bates, David H. Lincoln in the Telegraph Office. New York: D.Appleton-Century
 
            Company,1939.
Emery, Edwin.  The Press and America: an Interpretive History of Journalism.
 
            Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:  Prentice-Hall, 1962.
Gobright, Lawrence. Recollections of Men and Things at Washington During the
 
           Third of a Century. Philadelphia: Claxton, Remson & Haffelfinger,
1869.
Grant, U.S. Memoirs and Selected Letters. Mary Drake McFeely et al., eds.
 
        Washington D.C.: Library of Congress, 1990.
Greeley, Horace. Recollections of Busy Life. New York: Ford, 1873.
Hudson, Frederic.  Journalism in the United States, from 1690 to 1872. New
 
         York: Harper & Bros., 1873.
Jones, Robert W.  Journalism in the United States.  New York:  E. P. Dutton and
 
            Co., 1947.
Kamm, Samuel R.  The Civil War Career of Thomas A. Scott [Assistant Secretary
 
            of War]. Philadelphia:  University of Pennsylvania dissertation,
1940.
Lamont, Daniel S., Secretary of War, Et Al.  The War of the Rebellion: A
 
       Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies.
 
             Washington:  Government Printing Office, 1895.   Series I, vols.
XLVII part 3,
 
                 XXXVIII parts 1, 5,  XLVI parts 2,3,  XXXVI part 3,  LI part 1.
Marszalek, John F. Sherman's Other War: The General and the Civil War Press.
 
           Memphis:  Memphis State University Press, 1981.
Oates, Stephen B. With Malice Toward None: The Life of Abraham Lincoln. New
 
          York: Harper and Row, 1977.
Sherman, William Tecumseh. Memoirs of General W.T. Sherman. Washington: Library
 
            of Congress, 1990.
Thomas, Benjamin S.  and  Hyman, Harold M.   Stanton: The Life and Times of
 
          Lincoln's Secretary of War.  New York:  Alfred A. Knopf, 1962.
Villard, Henry.  The Memoirs of Henry Villard, Journalist and Financier,
 
       1835-1900, in Two Volumes. (Vol. 1). Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co.,
1904.
Ward, Geoffrey C. et al.  The Civil War (video). 1990.
 DAVID T. Z. MINDICH
Ph.D Candidate, American Studies
New York University
 
740 West End Avenue #10
New York City 10025
(212) 316-9211
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
 
WORK IN PROGRESS: DISSERTATION PROJECT
 
"Building the Pyramid: The Rise of 'Objectivity' in
19th Century American Journalism"
 
ABSTRACT
 
        The dissertation examines the confluence of forces that changed news
 
           writing from a chronological style in the 1830s to an "objective" one
by
 
            the 1890s.  Historians of journalism have long sought to find the
first
 
            practitioners of the "inverted pyramid" style of news writing, a
style
 
            which conveys the most important information in the first paragraphs
of
 
            a story;  the dissertation offers reasons for the development of the
 
          form and look at some early examples.  The work also suggests that the
 
            rhetoric of "objectivity" was often connected with an over-reliance
on
 
            governmental authority and voices of the "mainstream."

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main AEJMC Page

Permalink



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager