AEJMC Archives

AEJMC Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave AEJMC
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: AEJ 95 CollettL CTP Likely subscribers to 500 channel system
From: Elliott Parker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:AEJMC Conference Papers <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Jan 1996 19:36:17 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1464 lines)


CABLE READY OR NOT: PREDICTING LIKELY
              SUBSCRIBERSHIP TO A 500 CHANNEL SYSTEM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Larry Collette
Department of Radio-Television
Assistant Professor
[log in to unmask]
 
and
 
Shufei Kime
Telecommunication Program
Graduate Student
 
 
both at
Southern Illinois University
Department of Radio-Television
Carbondale, IL 62901-6601
(618) 457-6905
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Submitted for consideration to the Communication Technology and Policy
 
        Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass
 
  Communication,  April 1, 1995
 
 
Cable Ready or Not: Predicting Likely
              Subscribership to a 500 Channel System
 
 
 
ABSTRACT
 
 
        This paper examines consumer responses to the concept of a 500 channel
 
         cable system within a community where a digital, high capacity system
is
 
          scheduled to be deployed in the near future.  Telephone interviews
were
 
         conducted with 222 adults regarding their attitudes toward 500 channel
 
        systems, pricing issues, personal innovative tendency, and a variety of
 
         demographic factors.
        Preferences in terms of price and various billing options were explored
 
          and are reported within this study.  Differences were also discovered
in
 
          orientations toward a 500 channel cable system between cable and
non-cable
 
          respondents.  Finally, a regression model was created to predict
desire to
 
          subscribe to a 500 channel cable service. The resulting model
determined
 
          that attitudes toward 500 channel systems, current cable subscription,
TV
 
          use, and age were the best predictors of a desire to subscribe. These
 
       findings are discussed within the context of the changing media
environment
 in which cable systems will operate.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cable Ready or Not: Predicting Likely
 Subscribership to a 500 Channel System
 
 
        Perhaps one of the more dearly held tenets of our consumer society is
 
          that an increased amount of a good thing is in itself a good thing.
Yet,
 
          economists assert that as a person consumes more and more of a
particular
 
          commodity, there is a point beyond which there is a decline in the
extra
 
          satisfaction derived from the last unit of the commodity consumed
 
   (Mansfield, 1984). Thus, the marginal utility curve of any commodity will
 
          fall as a result of this law of diminishing marginal utility. This
economic
 concept is especially intriguing in light of the information future and
 
          consumer adoption of communication technologies. When faced with a
 
    profusion of information and entertainment options, how will the in-home
 
          consumer react to that 101st or 404th choice in a 500 channel
universe?
 
          The hyper-escalation of cable systems from their current average of 40
 
        channels-per-system to tomorrow's 500+ channel environments will make
such
 
          questions increasingly relevant.
        While the future promises an exciting world of virtually unlimited
 
     entertainment choice with the marriage of computing power, high capacity
 
          telecommunication circuits, and other technical advances (Gilder,
1992;
 
         Dizard, 1994), outside of proprietary circles, precious little is known
 
         concerning how users will greet this information/entertainment boom.
The
 
          arrival of this revolution of enhanced choice options for the consumer
 
        gives one pause to ask: "what will people be willing to pay for?" or in
the
 language of the day, "who will demand this video?" Both the behavioral
 
         patterns of cable subscribers and the decisions surrounding
subscribership
 
          are likely to be affected by this dramatic technological change.
        The cable industry, with its tradition of mostly one-way entertainment
 
         delivery, has fashioned a nameplate in the so-called 500 channel cable
 
        system.[1]  The industry's vision of the future consists largely of
expanded
 
          delivery capacity through use of digital compression technology and
fiber
 
          optic distribution systems which ultimately give consumers increased
arrays
 of programming options (National Cable Television Association, 1992).
 
        Compression techniques will allow downloading of content in seconds and
 
         when combined with fiber's bandwidth capacity, tens of thousands of
 
     requests will be handled simultaneously with little delay given adequate
 
          switching capability.  This is leading cable companies to commit to
 
     investments in digital compression technology which will allow the
 
    equivalent of 500 to 1000 channels into every home (National Cable
 
    Television Association, 1993).  Once capacity restrictions have been
 
      removed through system upgrades of aging cable plants, incumbent cable
 
        companies are favorably positioned to deliver these huge numbers of new
 
         channels to consumers. Over the next 10 years the industry will spend
$14
 
          billion to upgrade 75 percent of the existing systems in the United
States
 
          (National Cable Television Association, 1993).  Though the growth in
 
      channel offerings will likely be incremental, this actually reflects a
lack
 of available program services (software) and not limitations of the dist
 
          ribution technology itself (hardware).
        In April of 1994, Telecommunication Inc. (TCI) announced its "first phase
 
          deployment" plans to upgrade the distribution plants in 23 of its
service
 
          areas (Pierce, 1994).  Coupled with its National Digital Television
Center
 
          which will digitize analog TV signals and distribute them to the cable
 
        headends, these upgrades will represent a sharp increase in channel
 
     capacity to within that 500 channel range.  As such, the communities
 
      selected will be among the first to experience the 500+ channel cable
 
       environment. One of the 23 communities chosen for this upgrade was a
small
 
          rural midwestern town with a current base of about 2,300 cable
subscribers.
  A random sample drawn from that community population is the focus of the
 
          present survey research.  The purpose of this exploratory study is to
 
       assess the general perception of the value and possibilities of a 500
 
       channel system in an area where the technology is to be rolled out first.
 
          In doing so, it will also identify those types of persons most likely
to
 
          subscribe to these new systems.
Literature Review
Diffusion Research
     Diffusion research is the study of the social process of how
 
   innovation (new ideas, practices, objects, etc.) becomes known and spread
 
          throughout a social system (Rogers, 1983).  The research into
diffusion
 
         goes well beyond 3,000 articles and books, therefore, the reader will
be
 
          spared that exercise here.  Yet, there are certain distinctive
qualities of
 new media that lead us to expect their diffusion to differ from that
 
       generally found for other new ideas (Rogers, 1986). Concerning new, or
 
        developing technologies, the primary focus has appropriately been placed
on
 their critical mass nature, re-invention, and those issues related to both
 implementation and use.  For example, earlier adopters of new media tend
 
          to have high socioeconomic status, different communication behavior,
 
      greater empathy, less dogmatism, and more rationality when compared with
 
          later adopters (Rogers, 1986). Furthermore, the earlier adopters for
 
      certain technologies tend to be younger in age, mostly male, and display
 
          greater affinity for technology in general.
     Danko and MacLachlan (1983), while focusing upon the  acceleration of
 
          diffusion in new inventions, highlighted that an innovation can change
to
 
          give it a broader appeal, and there are ways in which to give
direction to
 
          that change.  In the same  vein, cable--a technology developed in the
 
       1950s--will be greatly reshaped by the proliferation of new channels,
 
       marking the onset of innovation.
      The difficulties that one encounters in forecasting the adoption of
 
          new media are fairly well known (Klopfenstein, 1988).  These problems
range
 from a failure to consider competing social factors to an over-reliance on
 unstable models.  The classic problem faced in predicting consumer-intent
 
          in light of new technologies is that surveys often require people to
assess
 likelihood of adopting something that doesn't exist. John Carey (1993)
 
         suggests that this is roughly equivalent to asking a person "would you
buy
 
          a flying dog?"  Yet, even though 500 channel cable systems are not
 
    presently available, the concept of cable television is fairly well
 
     established and familiar to most people.  Also, many of the present cable
 
          program services can be expected to be reasonably analogous to future
 
       offerings on new systems (Zoglin, 1993). At the same time, 500 channels
 
         does represent an innovation, therefore, people's adoption of it
remains
 
          uncertain.  This is especially true as prices rise to cover capital
costs
 
          of system upgrades and new pricing structures are needed. These 500
channel
 services can clearly go beyond existing communication services to offer
 
          new, alternative applications and choices for cable subscribers.
        Sparkes and Kang (1986) suggested that judgement of compatibility and
 
        relative advantages associated with cable are the most important issues
in
 
          personal decisions whether or not to adopt the technology.  Economists
 
        speak of this as the "utility" attached to any purchase decision which
 
        becomes an important criterion for action (Clower,Graves, and Sexton,
 
       1988).  People will find advantage or utility in cable subscription if it
 
          possesses attributes regarded by them as valuable.  This is in general
 
        agreement with logic models of consumer behavior which assume that
 
    consumers confronted by two alternative choices or "market baskets" (e.g.
 
          cable or no cable) can decide if they prefer the first to the second,
the
 
          second to the first or are indifferent among the two.  The
expectancies
 
         (perceptions) that a potential buyer/user has for a particular service
or
 
          good contribute in large part to that subsequent decision (Edwards,
1954).
 
          Importantly, Ostlund (1974) found that the perception of an innovation
by
 
          its potential adopters can be a stronger predictor of acceptance than
 
       simply those personal characteristics of the adopter alone.  Thus, the
 
        attitudes one holds toward a 500 channel cable system can play an
important
 role in shaping desire to subscribe (or not) and will coexist with other
 
          person-related factors.  For example, we might suspect that
perceptions of
 
          viewing decisions being made too arduous with 500 channels may have a
 
       negative impact on the desire to subscribe.
Demographic Factors in Cable Subscribership
        Coinciding with the impact of the first cable revolution, a variety of
 
         studies were done that analyzed cable subscription and its relationship
to
 
          demographic variables (Agostino, 1980; Sparkes, 1983; Webster, 1983;
 
      Collins, Reagan, and Abel, 1983;  Donohue, Cook, and Cheung, 1984;
Metzger,
 1983). The results of these studies were at times conflicting. For
 
     example, Collins, Reagan, and Abel (1983) reported that cable
          subscribership was not related to age. While, Krugman (1985) suggested
that
 cable subscribers were younger than non-subscribers. Ducey, Krugman, and
 
          Eckrich (1983) found that pay cable subscribers were younger than
basic
 
         subscribers, and indicated a strong preference for the pay service in
that
 
          they subscribed to basic cable in order to receive pay services.
LaRose
 
          and Atkin (1988) later found that age had no impact on intention to
 
     discontinue service.
        The findings regarding income's relationship to cable subscription were
 
          also inconsistent among studies. While Donohue, Cook, and Cheung
(1984)
 
         found that higher incomes were a predictor of subscription, Collins,
 
      Reagan, and Abel (1983) reported that lower incomes better predicted cable
 
          subscription. Heeter and Greenberg (1988) did find cable subscribers
to
 
         have higher incomes and more children than non-cable subscribers.
While
 
          Agostino (1980) found that income itself had little bearing on
predicting
 
          cable subscription.  As for education, Krugman (1985) found that
higher
 
         levels of education and cable subscription were positively correlated,
 
        while Sparkes (1983) suggested an inverse relationship, as those with
lower
 education levels were more likely to subscribe.
Cable and Non-cable Households Differences
        A good deal of research tends to confirm that non-cable and cable
 
    households do differ in a variety of ways (Rothe, Harvey, and Michael,
 
        1983; Greenberg, Heeter, D'Alessio, and Sipes, 1988).  That time spent
 
        watching television increases with cable subscription is probably the
less
 
          contested finding associated with cable TV behavior (Becker, Dunwoody
and
 
          Rafaeli, 1983; Nielsen, 1993). Cable subscribers not only watch more
 
      television than non-cable subscribers but were more likely to own a VCR
and
 computer than non-cable subscribers (Heeter and Greenberg, 1988). This
 
         suggests that cable subscribers exhibit a greater tendency to adopt
other
 
          electronic technology too.  Likewise, cable subscribers tend to be
greater
 
          users of media in general.
        Sparkes (1983) compared cable subscribers and nonsubscribers on a variety
 
          of behavioral and attitudinal measures across time.   His findings
 
    highlighted the attitudinal differences between the two groups when it came
 to cable service.  Sparkes and Kang (1986) further studied attitudinal and
 behavioral changes that arose from direct consumer experiences with cable.
  Consumer attitudes changed from naive enthusiasm, through disappointment,
 to modified appreciation when dealing with cable television but there was
 
          little change in viewing behavior.
Method
     Telephone interviews of approximately a twenty-minute duration were
 
          conducted by trained interviewers over a two-week period in the Spring
of
 
          1994. The survey population consisted of persons 18 years or older
living
 
          within the dialing area of the community under study. A list of random
 
        numbers was generated through use of the local telephone directory and
 
        two-hundred twenty-two (n=222) useable surveys were collected.[2]
Research Questions
        This project is guided by the following research questions:  RQ1.       How
 
          much will people be willing to pay for a 500 channel cable service?
 
RQ2.    What payment options would people prefer for a 500 channel cable
 
        service?
 
RQ3.    Do differences exist in the perceived importance of, attitudes
 
      toward, and intention to subscribe to a 500 channel cable system between
 
                    those in cable and non-cable households?
 
RQ4.            Can desire to subscribe to a 500 channel cable system be predicted by
 (a) attitudes toward a 500 channel cable system,(b) innovative tendency,
 
          (c) cable subscription, (d) television use, and (e) demographic
variables?
 
Research questions 1 and 2 are exploratory and aimed at gaining some sense
 
          of consumer valuation of these future services.  Question 3 assumes
that
 
          differences in orientations toward 500 channel systems will emerge
among
 
          cable and non-cable respondents. The anticipated differences are
expected
 
          to result from those expectancies created via direct experience with
 
      present cable service.  In addition, differences may also be a product of
 
          predispositions that have guided past decision-making regarding cable
serv
 
          ice which are now being applied to 500 channel cable. The final
question
 
          examines the degree to which desire to subscribe to a 500 channel
service
 
          may be determined by attitudes toward these systems, innovative
tendency,
 
          TV use, and demographics as has been suggested by prior research on
 
     innovation and cable.
Questionnaire
     The survey instrument was comprised of the following: a 15 item scale
 
          measuring attitudes toward a 500 channel cable system (ATT500), a
9-item
 
          scale measuring innovative tendency toward electronic technology
 
  (INOVTECH), and items dealing with payment preferences for a 500 channel
 
          cable system (See Appendix for scale items). Attitudes toward a 500
channel
 system were based on responses to a series of statements such as "A 500
 
          channel cable service would allow me to take better control over my
own
 
         television viewing" and "Most people do not need 500 channels of
television
 video services."  Responses were scored on a five-point Likert-like scale
 
          ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. The construct of
 
    innovative tendency is defined as the degree to which a person is accepting
 of innovation. Here this tendency is applied specifically to electronic
 
          technology (INOVTECH) and measured by responses to statements such as
"It
 
          is important for me to 'be the first on my block' to have new
electronic
 
          equipment."  Responses were again scored along a five point
Likert-like
 
         scale, Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree.  The items in the index
measure
 ATT500 had an alpha of .86 and for INOVTECH .82, indicating an acceptable
 
          level of reliability in the index measures used (Nunnally, 1978).
        In addition, questions dealing with media use, cable subscription, and
 
         demographic information were included in the questionnaire.  The
perceived
 
          personal importance of the 500 channel system was measured by the
single
 
          item "How important is it for you to have a 500 channel cable system?"
The
 
          responses being on a four point Likert-like scale (4=Very important to
 
        1=Not important).  Data regarding programming type preference were also
 
         gathered and will not be reported here.
        To assess consumer valuation, respondents were asked how much they were
 
          willing to devote per month for entertainment and service on a 500
channel
 
          cable system on a 5 point scale: $31-40 (1), $41-50 (2), $51-60 (3),
$61-70
 (4), $71-80 (5), $81 or more.[3]  The respondents were also asked to indicate
 the form of monthly payment preferred for a 500 channel system.  These
 
         were measured using a 5-point Likert-like scale response,(5) Very Good
to
 
          (1) Very Bad, to presented options.  Options included the following:
.       A fee based on amount of time TV set is actually tuned to a     particular
 
          channel.
 
.       A set fee for each individual channel regardless of how
much time it is watched.
 
.       A set fee for channels that are grouped by category and
payment is not determined by how much they are watched.
 
.       A differing fee for viewing during different times of day,
much like your telephone bill.
 
Statistical Analyses
 
        Statistical analyses for RQ3 were T-tests of the difference in mean scores
 between the two groups, cable subscribers and non-subscribers, on the
 
        three variables: ATT500, Perceived Importance of 500 Channels, and
Desire
 
          to Subscribe.  For RQ4, the independent variables used in the
regression
 
          analysis are ATT500, INOVTECH, TV use, cable subscription, age,
education,
 
          household size, and income. The dependent variable, Desire to
Subscribe
 
         (DS), was measured by response to "I would like to subscribe to a 500
ch
 
         annel cable system if it were available to me" using a 5 point
Likert-like
 
          scale (5=Strongly Agree to 1=Strongly Disagree).  A stepwise multiple
 
       regression procedure was selected to assess the relative contribution of
 
          the variables in explaining desire to subscribe to a 500 channel cable
 
        system.  Tests of significance were all set at the .05 level.
Results
Sample Profile
        The sample population was 61 percent female and 39 percent male. The
 
       average age of respondents was 39 years old. Forty-nine percent of those
 
          surveyed were 18 to 34 years of age, 33 percent were 35 to 54 years of
age,
 with the rest being over 55 years.  Reported annual household income was
 
          as follows: 23 percent under $15,000, 17 percent $15,001 to $25,000,
21
 
         percent $25,001 to $35,000, 13 percent $35,001 to $45,000, 11 percent
being
 above $45,001, with the remainder refusing to answer. As for education, 28
 percent graduated high school, 31 percent had some college, 21 percent
 
         were college graduates, and 12 percentage had some post graduate study.
 
          Most people lived in households with three or more people (44
percent),
 
         with 34 percent living in two person households, and 18 percent living
 
        alone.
        Sixty-two percent of those surveyed indicated that they were currently
 
         cable subscribers. Across the entire survey population, 35 percent
 
    indicated they were aware of the plans to offer new digital cable service
 
          in their area.
Data Analysis
     In answering RQ1, assessing how much people are willing to pay for a
 
          500 Channel Cable service, where a preference was stated, most people
opted
 for the lowest cost payment category (See Table 1). The findings indicate
 
          that 41 percent of respondents would be willing to pay $31-40 per
month for
 a 500 channel cable system.  This is the amount most similar to the
 
      current national average for monthly payment for basic and premium
services
 combined (see endnote 3).  At the same time, 53 percent of the people
 
        expressed a willingness to pay $31-50 monthly.  The absolute threshold
for
 
          monthly spending for such a service appears to be $60 as reflected by
the
 
          steep drop off in responses beyond that range.  At the same time, 41
 
      percent of the sample indicated "Don't know" or "It depends," thus
 
    suggesting a great deal of uncertainty as to value as perceived by
 
    consumers.
        As for RQ2, the forms of payment for a 500 channel system are presented in
 Table 3 as frequencies, percentages, mean, and standard deviation.  These
 
          findings indicate that respondents favored "A flat fee in which
channels
 
          are grouped by category and you pay for each group regardless of how
much
 
          you watch it."  This is the option most similar to the traditional
cable
 
          pricing model in which subscribers select "packages of channels" in
the
 
         form of service tiers, flat-rated, regardless of use.  Interestingly, a
 
         flat rate structure when attached to individual channel options (ala
carte)
 was unpopular as a plurality (40 percent) thought it either a "bad" or
 
         "very bad" option. The pricing option based on time for which the set
in
 
          use, tuned to a particular channel, was the next favored option
(X=2.94).
 
          The least popular, with 50 percent indicating it to be either a "bad"
or
 
          "very bad" option was "time of day" pricing likened to the telephone
 
      billing system.
        There were significant differences among those in cable and non-cable
 
        households in two of the three independent variables measured.  The mean
 
          score of "Perceived Importance of 500 channels" of cable subscribers
 
      (1.53), and that of non-cable subscribers (1.03) was not significantly
 
        different, the probability of t-value .06 being slightly greater than
.05.
 
Thus indicating that there was no significant difference in perception of
 
          importance of a 500 channel cable system between cable and non-cable
 
      subscribers surveyed.  However, there were significant differences in
 
       attitudes toward a 500 channel cable system (ATT500) between current
cable
 
          and non-cable subscribers.  Table 3 shows the mean score on ATT500 of
cable
 subscribers (2.89) and non-cable subscribers (2.39) as being significantly
 different, with the probability of t-value less than .05.  There was also
 
          a significant difference in the Desire to Subscribe to a 500 channel
 
      service between current cable and non-cable subscribers.  Table 3 reveals
 
          the mean of Desire to Subscribe (DS) to a 500 channel cable system for
 
        cable subscribers (3.14), and non-cable subscribers (2.24) to be
 
  significantly different (p.<.05).
        The results of the stepwise multiple regression procedure are seen in
 
        Table 4 and offer answers to RQ4.  All variable blocks entered accounted
 
          for a significant increase in total variance (See Table 4).  First
entered
 
          was (ATT500) attitude toward 500 channel service which alone accounted
for
 
          33 percent of the variance explained (R Square=.66, p<.01).  Cable
 
    subscription was the second variable to enter, third entered was TV Use,
 
          and Age was the last variable entered (R Square=.71, p<.05).  The
remaining
 variables that did not enter into the final equation were INVOTECH,
 
      education, income, and HH size.
    Discussion
        With 96 percent of the nation's households now capable of receiving cable
 
          service (Kagan and Associates, 1992), the new focus in the industry's
 
       evolution has been placed on upgrading capacity rather than expanding
 
       territory. The historic pattern of industry development which saw systems
 
          in small communities being developed first is in some ways being
repeated
 
          in the movement toward 500 channel environments.[4]  This circumstance
seems
 
          likley to be occurring for several reasons. First, in these smaller
 
     communities the demand for service is relatively inelastic due to poorer
 
          reception, a scarcity of over-the-air channels, thus making cable an
 
      attractive option.[5]  Also, the lower capital costs of rebuilding smaller
 
         franchise areas helps to reduce the risks associated with these
rebuilding
 
          ventures. Finally, in many respects these upgraded areas represent
workable
 "testbeds" for better understanding the cable consumer of the future.
        This paper has explored the response of potential consumers in a community
 scheduled to be among the first serviced by a 500 channel cable system.
 
          Interestingly, over 40 percent of those surveyed expressed an
uncertainty
 
          as to what such a system would be worth to them.  This seems entirely
 
       reasonable as the attributes of these large systems at this point seem
 
        speculative to the average consumer. Where a preference was expressed,
the
 
          lowest price category won out, perhaps a reflection of human nature
more
 
          than anything else. Still, 41 percent were willing to embrace a price
 
       roughly equivalent to the combined average now spent by the basic and
 
       premium service household.  There did appear to be a threshold beyond
which
 prices dare not go, the $60-per-month range. Compaigne (1993) asserts that
 consumer expenditures in media have been remarkably constant as a
 
    proportion of discretionary spending for the past five years. This would
 
          seem to suggest that new cable offerings and their price will simply
carve
 
          up the existing consumer pie in a different fashion.  How this plays
out in
 an environment where increased pay-per-view options, services such as
 
        games and video conferencing are likley to be offered, remains to be
seen.
 
          Given the robust potential for offerings in a broadband switched
 
  environment, whole new classes of interactive services are likley to
 
      emerge.  How they will be greeted by consumer spending must be studied in
 
          the future with greater specificity than was possible in this project.
 
        Also, based on our findings, respondents preferred pricing arrangements
 
          most similar to present cable services in which prepackaged groups of
 
       channels are offered at a set fee.
This might simply be a case of "familiarity breeding liking" as consumers
 
          are accustomed to this marketing method currently used by cable
companies.
 
          While the ultimate extension of consumer sovereignty may be possible,
in
 
          that customized cable menus can be built, this was not the favored
option.
 
          This may be heartening to some general interest cable services whose
 
      circulation would surely drop if consumers were allowed to "pick and pay."
 Yet, as a cable company's costs of acquiring content services rises in
 
         conjunction with the need to fill cavernous channel capacity, prices
will
 
          surely move upward along with the firm's cost of providing service.
 
      Consumers may soon welcome an increased selectivity that keeps their
 
      personal costs in line with the utility of the services selected by
 
     themselves. Given that most cable subscribers now use only a fraction of
 
          the offerings available to them (Heeter and Greenberg, 1988)
self-created
 
          menus might be a viable alternative in the future. The transition
toward
 
          such a "personalized" system is perhaps less a technological barrier
than a
 psychological barrier for the consumer who must now choose favorites and
 
          sacrifice other alternatives, no matter how lightly viewed some are.
        The differences among cable and non-cable respondent in their
 
       orientations toward a 500 channel cable system were addressed in this
 
       study.  Though cable subscribers placed greater importance on having a
500
 
          channel service than did non-subscribers, there was not a significant
 
       difference between them.  Where significant differences did appear it was
 
          in the case of attitudes held toward 500 channel service (ATT500) and
in
 
          the desire to subscribe (DS) to such a service.  Here we might suspect
that
 the familiarity with cable service and predisposition toward cable
 
     contributed to these differences. Thus, the schema called upon by these
 
         respondents may have been quite different. Then why didn't the
"Perceived
 
          Importance" variable produce similar results?  It could very well be
that
 
          cable subscribers used a frame of reference in which "importance"
meant the
 importance of having 500 channels as opposed to the present 36 channels,
 
          merely a perception of an increased amount. This is in contrast to the
 
        non-subscribers who might have been responding to the differential
between
 
          having cable and not having cable in their evaluation of importance.
 
       Nevertheless, the correlation between Perceived Importance and Desire to
 
          Subscribe was .41 (p<.01) and suggests that regardless of grouping,
 
     perceived importance is strongly related to desire to subscribe to this
 
         service.
        In considering those variables that best predicted desire to subscribe to
 
          a 500 channel system, the attitudinal measure clearly stands out for
its
 
          importance (ATT500).  This is in general agreement with theories of
 
     reasoned action in which attitudes are known to be important in determining
 likely outcomes (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1980).  Having a favorable attitude
 
          toward these services is a strong predictor of the desire to subscribe
to
 
          them. Being a current cable subscriber, a heavier viewer of TV, also
cont
 
          ributed to this predictive measure and seem logical in their
inclusion. Age
 was found to be negatively related as younger people expressed greater
 
         desire to subscribe.  That other demographic variables did not appear
in
 
          the final equation is consonant with LaRose and Atkin's (1988)
assertion
 
          that demographic variables now play a lesser role (than attitudes) in
 
       considerations of cable related behaviors.  It is somewhat surprising
that
 
          the innovative tendency measure (INOVTECH) did not enter in the
equation.
 
          The measure did have a strong positive correlation (r=.40, p<.01) to
the
 
          dependent measure Desire to Subscribe. Yet, placed in combination with
the
 
          other independent variables it failed to make a significant
contribution to
 the amount of variance explained.
Conclusion
        As the various scenarios of the information future take shape, the
 
     strategic plans for gaining a competitive advantage will have to involve
 
          more than simply the technology itself. The new products and services
 
       provided through the broadband, multimedia networks that will overlay
 
       today's telecommunication infrastructure will have to prove economic
 
      viability through their acceptance by willing consumers.
        Cable television has developed from a small market with a utilitarian
 
        product--improved TV reception--into today's $22 billion a year industry
by
 offering more choice. Increased competition from the Regional Bell
 
     Operating Companies, Direct Broadcast Satellite, and other sources of
 
       information and entertainment is a certainty. As a result of that
 
   competition, consumers seem likely to become increasingly indifferent to
 
          the methods of transport used to bring in video services and much more
 
        concerned with their utility and costs.  Therefore, those companies
having
 
          a "being there first" advantage will have to respond quickly to
consumer
 
          desires.                              It seems obvious that cable
companies
 
          should aim their efforts at creating favorable attitudes surrounding
500
 
          channel cable services in order to promote subscribership. But this
task is
 complicated by the fact these systems are in their earliest stages of
 
        development.  In the future, the challenge will be to expand the market
 
         beyond the base of current cable subscribers and heavier users of
 
   television, those identified in this study. These people have in the past
 
          already derived some value from cable and seem favorably inclined
toward
 
          future offerings. As systems develop, as their services and content
are
 
         increasingly defined, the marketplace and consumer orientations are
likely
 
          to evolve as well.  Ultimately, companies supplying a world of
unlimited
 
          information and entertainment choice must still operate within the
harsh
 
          demands of a new marketplace.
References
 
Agostino, D. (1980).  Cable Television's Impact on the Audience
of Public Television. Journal of Broadcasting. 24, 347-365.
 
Atkin, D., and LaRose, R.  (1988). "Satisfaction, Demographic,          and
 
         Media Environment Predictors of Cable Subscription."
Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 32(4), 403-     413.
 
Atkin, D., and LaRose, R.  (1991).  "Cable Access:  Market
 
         Concerns Amidst the Marketplace of Idea."
     Journalism Quarterly, 68(3), 354-362.
 
Becker, L.B., Dunwoody, S. and Rafaeli, S. (1983). Cable's Impact       on the
 
          Use of Other News Media.  Journal of Broadcasting. 27, 127-140.
 
Carey, J. (1993).  Looking Back to the Future:  How Communication
 
    Technologies Enter American Households.  In J. Pavlik and E. Dennis (eds.).
 Demystifying Media Technology. (pp. 32-39).  Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
 
 
Collins, J., Reagan J. and Abel, J. D. (1983).  "Predicting Cable
 
         Subscribership:Local Factors."  Journal of Broadcasting,
     27(2),177-183.
 
Compaigne, B. (1993). Fresh Perspectives on the Information
Business. In J. Pavlik and E. Dennis. (eds.).  Demystifying Media
 
        Technology. (pp. 40-54).  Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Clower, R., Graves, P., and Sexton, R. (1988).  Intermediate
Microeconomics. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Janovitch.
 
Danko, W. D. and MacLanchlan, J.  (1983).  "Research to
 
         Accelerate the Diffusion of a New Invention."
     Journal of Advertising Research, 23:39-43.
 
Dizard, W. (1994).  Old Media, New Media.  White Plains, NY:
Longman.
 
Donohue, R., Cook, C., and Cheung, D. (1984). The Impact of Cable       on
 
       Traditional TV News Viewing.  Journalism Quarterly, 61, 174-178.
 
Ducey, R. V., Krugman, D. M. and Eckrich, D.  (1983).   "Predicting  Market
 Segments in the Cable Industry:  The Basic and Pay Subscribers."  Journal
 
          Broadcasting, 27(2), 155-161.
 
 
Edwards, W. (1954).  The theory of decision making. Psychological       Bulletin
 
          . 5, 380-415.
 
Elmer-Dewitt, P. (April 12, 1993).  "Take a Trip into the Future       on
 
          the Electronic Superhighway."  Time, P.52.
 
Fishbein, M.,& Ajzen, I.  (1980).  Understanding Attitudes and
     Predicting Social Behavior.  Prentice-Hall, Inc.,
     Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
 
Gilder, G. (1992).  Life After Television. New York: W.W. Norton.
Greenberg, B., Heeter, C., D'Allessio, D., and Sipes, B. (1988).        Cable
 
          and Non-cable Viewing Comparisons.  In Cable Viewing.  C. Heeter and
B.
 
              Greenberg (eds.).  Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
 
Heeter, C., and Greenberg, B. S.  (1988).  Cable-viewing.
 
       Norwood, New Jersey:  Ablex Corporation.
 
Klopfenstein, B. (1988).  Problems and potential forecasting the        adoption
 
          of new media.  In J. Salvaggio and J. Bryant (eds.).  Media Use in the
 
             Information Age: Emerging Patterns of Adoption and Consumer Use.
(pp.
 
            21-42).  Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
 
Kolbert, E.  (Jan. 4, 1992).  "Deciding What to Watch When 500  channels
 
          Await."  New York Times
 
Krugman, D.  Evaluating the Audience in New Media. Journal of
Advertising. 14 (4), 21-27.
 
Mansfield, E. (1984).  Principles of Microeconmics.  Fourth
edition.  New York: W.W. Norton.
 
Midgley, D. F.  and Grahame R. D.  (1978)  "Innovativeness:  The
 
         Concept and its measurement."  The Journal of Consumer
Research.
  1:23-29.
 
National Cable Television Association (1992). Report on Cable.
Washington, D.C :NCTA.
 
National Cable Television Association (1993). Cable Television
and America's Telecommunications Infrastructure. Washington, D.C. :NCTA
 
Nielsen Media Research (1993).  1992-1993 Report On Television.
New York: Nielsen Media Research.
 
Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory. (Second edition). New
York: McGraw-Hill.
 
 
Ostlund, L. E. (1974).  "Perceived Innovation Attributes As
     Predictors of Innovativeness."  The Journal of Consumer
     Research. 1:23-29.
 
Pierce, V. (April 8, 1994).  "Murphysboro to leap into digital
     revoluation."  Southern Illinoisan.
 
Pool, Ithiel De Sola.  (1983).  Technologies of Freedom.
     Cambridge, Mass:  Harvard University Press.
 
Rogers, E. M.  (1983).  Diffusion of Innovation,  The Free Press,
     New York, NY.
 
Rogers, E. M.  (1986).  Communication Technology:  The New media
     in Society, The Free Press, New York, NY.
 
Rothe, J., Harvey, and Michael, G. (1983).  The Impact of Cable
Television on Subscriber and Non-susbscriber behavior. Journal of
 
        Advertising Research. 23, 15-24.
 
Sahal, D.  (1981).  Patterns of technological Innovation,
     Addision-Wesley Publications, Inc., New York, NY.
 
Sparkes, V. M. (1983).  Public Perception of and Reaction to
     Multi-channel Cable television Service.  Journal of
     Broadcasting, 27(2), 163-175.
 
Sparkes, V. M., & Kang, N.  (1986).  "Public Reactions to Cable
     Television:  Time in the Diffusion Process."  Journal of
     Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 30(2). 213-229.
 
Webster, J. G. (1983).  "The Impact of Cable and Pay Cable
     Television on Local Station Audiences."  Journal of
     Broadcasting, 27(2).  119-126.
 
Zoglin, R. (1993).  When the Revolution Comes What Will Happen
to..."  Time Magazine.  April, 12, pp. 56-58.
 
 
Table 1
 
 
Projected Monthly $ Spent on a 500 Channel Cable System
 
 
 
____________________________________________________________
 Amount per Month         Frequency        Percentage
__________________________________________________________
(1) $31-40                              90                      40.5
 
(2) $41-50                              27                      12.2
 
(3) $51-60                               9                       4.1
 
(4) $61-70                               2                       0.9
 
(5) $71-80                               0                        .0
 
(6) $81 or more                  0                        .0
 
(7) It Depends.                 38                      17.1
 
(8) Don't Know.                 54                      24.3
 
(9) Missing data                         2                       0.9
------
n=222
 
 
Table 2
Description of Preferred Payment Options
____________________________________________________________
The form of payment      Value     F     %    Mean   SD
____________________________________________________________
A set fee in which channels     1   24  10.8   3.05  1.08
are grouped by category and     2   40    18.0
you pay for each group       3   72    32.4
regardless of how much you      4   74    33.3
watch it.                                       5   12     5.4
 
A fee based on the amount       1   33    14.9   2.94  1.21
of time your television set     2   46    20.7
is tuned to particular          3   66    29.7
channel.                                4   53    23.9
                                                5   23    10.4
                                                .    1     0.5
 
A set fee for each              1   43    19.4   2.80  1.22
individual channel                      2   47    21.2
regardless of how much          3   57    25.7
you watch it.                           4   60    27.0
                              5   14     6.3
                              .    1     0.5
 
 
A different fee for viewing     1   60    27.0   2.56  1.26
at different times of day,      2   52    23.4
for example, like a telephone   3   47    21.2
bill where certain times of     4   49    22.1
day are discounted.                     5   13     5.9
                                                .    1     0.5
 
_________________________
n=222
5 =Very Good, 1=Very Bad.
"."= Missing data.
 
 
 
Table 3
 
Comparisons of Cable Subscribers and Non-subscribers on
 Perception of Importance, ATT500, and Desire to Subscribe
 
 
__________________________________________________________
           Subscribers    Non-subscribers
               N=138           N=74
             Mean    SD    Mean   SD    T      DF   Prob.t
          ___________________________________________________________
 
Perceived     1.53      1.03    1.28 .79  -1.93   186.04  .055
importance
 
 
ATT500      2.89   .71    2.39  .70  4.97   151.56  .000
 
 
Desire to     3.14       1.10   2.24  1.07 -5.74  153.21  .000
Subscribe
___________________
 
n=212, 10 cases with missing data removed from analysis
 
 
 
 
                         Table 4
 
Stepwise Regression Independent Variables
on Desire to Subscribe to 500 Channels
 
 
 
R Square          .709
Standard Error    .641
F               93.891
 
Regression  df       6
Residual           154
 
 
Variables in    Beta   F     R Square   P
____________________________________________________________
 
ATT500           .81      300.95   .66          .00
 
Cable            .17      169.14         .68            .00
Subscription
 
Hrs. TV         .12    119.33    .70            .00
 
Age                  -.11          93.90         .71            .05
 
 
______
 
Variables not entered in equation: INOVTECH, Income, Education, HH size
 
 
Appendix
 
Scale items for ATT500
 
1.      I am very interested in the idea of a 500 channel cable system.
 
2.      Most people do not need 500 channels of television video services.
 
3.      I would need a lot more information about the system before     subscribing
 to a 500 channel cable system.
 
4.      The thought of having 500 hundred channels available on a cable system
 
          seems overwhelming to me.
 
5.      With 500 hundred channels to select from, I am concerned it will be hard
 to choose which one to watch.
 
6.      With a 500 channel system in their home, people will spend too much time
 watching television.
 
7.      A 500 channel cable system would give me something to do
when I am bored that regular television can't.
 
8.      A 500 channel cable system would help me get away from my daily troubles
 in a way that regular television probably can't.
 
9.      A 500 channel cable system would help me keep better track
        of what is going on in the world.
 
10.     A 500 channel cable system would help me keep better track
of what is going on in the local community.
 
11.     With 500 channels available to me, I'd probably prefer
watching television to renting a videotape.
 
12.     I would be reluctant to have a 500 channel cable service
even on a one-month trial basis.
 
13.     The idea of carrying out business transactions such as banking or
 
       shopping through my cable service appeals to me.
 
14.     A 500 channel cable service would allow me to take better control of my
 own television viewing.
 
15.     I consider myself fairly knowledgeable when it comes to 500 channel
 
         cable systems.
 
 
Scale Items for INVOTECH
 
1.      It is important for me to be "the first on my block" to have new
 
     electronic equipment.
 
2.      I enjoy trying our new electronic products or services, new computers,
 
          software, and things like that.
 
3.      I am fairly knowledgeable when it come to new electronic
products.
 
4.      Friends and family often look to me for advice about new electronic
 
        equipment.
 
5.      I look forward to getting new electronic equipment in my home.
 
6.      Knowing about new electronic products makes me feel up-to-date on
 
      trends.
 
7.      Having new electronic equipment in my home generally makes my life
 
       better.
 
8.      In general, I distrust new technologies.
 
9.      New electronic products are usually unnecessary because they do not add
 
          to the quality of people's lives.
 
 
 
 [1]  The term 500 channels has little technical meaning as related to cap
acity (e.g.
 
         defining limits), but rather it has become a fa
irly convenient symbolic term for vastly
 
            expanded services.
  It is a term that has been adopted by the popular press (see Elmer-
 
 
          Dewitt, 1993) and used to describe this large capacity systems.
 
[2]  The completion rate was 38 percent.  In addition to refusal, twenty
 five surveys were
 excluded from the study because they were from the wro
ng telephone prefix, incomplete, or
 otherwise deemed unusable.
[3]  The
starting point of the scale was set at $31 as it reflects the average month
ly
 
           basic rate ($20.75) plus the monthly average pay rate ($
10.48) for cable service in 1993
 
            (Kagan Associates, 1993) a
nd seems a reasonable starting point.
[4]  The communities selected for
the first phase roll-out by TCI were geographically
 
          dispers
ed and most had populations of under 50,000 residents.
[5]  DBS does repr
esent a viable competitor especially in more rural locales, yet the
 
 
         degree to which it is a reasonable substitute for cable service is
 countervailed by the
 
            need for consumers to pay around $700
 for per dish in addition to monthly charges.

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main AEJMC Page

Permalink



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager