AEJMC Archives

AEJMC Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave AEJMC
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: AEJ 05 FlemingK MCS An empirical investigation of the relationships among fear and efficacy of breast cancer, media use, and knowledge about breast cancer prevention in Caucasian and African American women
From: Elliott Parker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:AEJMC Conference Papers <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Mon, 6 Feb 2006 06:16:35 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1107 lines)


This paper was presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and
Mass Communication in San Antonio, Texas August 2005.
         If you have questions about this paper, please contact the author
directly. If you have questions about the archives, email
rakyat [ at ] eparker.org. For an explanation of the subject line, 
send email to
[log in to unmask] with just the four words, "get help info aejmc," in the
body (drop the "").

(Feb 2006)
Thank you.
Elliott Parker
====================================================================

An empirical investigation of the relationships
among fear and efficacy of breast cancer, media use, and knowledge 
about breast cancer prevention
in Caucasian and African American women




Kenneth Fleming
Cynthia Frisby
University of Missouri-Columbia





Correspondence to the first author:
Kenneth Fleming
School of Journalism
University of Missouri-Columbia
135 Neff Annex
Columbia, MO 65211
Tel: (573) 882-3396
Fax: (573) 882-2890
Email: [log in to unmask]





Research paper submitted to the topic of "The Operation, Function and 
Impact of Ethnic and Minority Media on Society" of the Mass 
Communication & Society Division of the Association for Education in 
Journalism & Mass Communication Convention
in San Antonio, Texas in Aug. 10-13, 2005
An empirical investigation of the relationships among fear and 
efficacy of breast cancer, media use, and knowledge about breast 
cancer prevention
in Caucasian and African American women


Abstract


	This study examines the relationships among attitudes toward breast 
cancer, knowledge about the disease, religious beliefs, and use of 
various news media channels in Caucasian (n=240) and African American 
(n=206) women randomly selected in eleven metropolitan areas in the 
U.S. Results show that magazines were negatively related to fear of 
breast cancer, and radio was positively related to efficacy of the 
disease for African American women. Use of the Internet was a 
predictor of efficacy for Caucasian women. Radio significantly 
contributed to knowledge about breast cancer for both groups of 
women. Religious beliefs and knowledge about breast cancer were also 
predictors of fear and efficacy of the disease, but with opposing 
effects and to different women.

An empirical investigation of the relationships among fear and 
efficacy of breast cancer, media use, and knowledge about breast 
cancer prevention
in Caucasian and African American women

African American women are more likely than Caucasian women to be 
diagnosed at later stages of breast cancer and are more likely to die 
from the disease (e.g., NCI, 2004; Hoffman-Goetz, 1999). Perhaps one 
of the reasons lies with the differential learning patterns of the 
two groups of women. Previous research has shown that individuals 
with high education levels tend to learn information from news media 
sources at a faster rate than those with low education levels (e.g., 
Rosenstock et al, 1988; Frisby, 2002; Gantz et al., 2004). The 
present study, then, tests whether knowledge about breast cancer, 
along with use of various news media sources and religious beliefs, 
would influence two important but opposing attitudes toward the 
disease -- fear and efficacy of breast cancer -- in both Caucasian 
and African American women.
Knowledge about the disease and its risks was poor among African 
American women who did not want or desire mammography, and those who 
expressed desire for a mammogram perceived themselves as more 
susceptible to breast cancer and considered the disease severer than 
those who did not want a mammogram (Price et al., 1992). Other p



revious research shows that African Americans generally display a 
greater tendency to delay or avoid contact with health providers 
(AMA, 2004; Ford & Cooper, 1995; Howard, Penchansky, &Brown, 1998). 
Meanwhile, they rely on cultural and religious beliefs in coping with 
breast cancer and other diseases (e.g., Royak-Schaler et al., 1995; 
Bobo, 1995; Cardwell & Collier, 1981). Thus, steps to increase 
participation in breast cancer screening programs may require 
increasing public efforts that not only effectively disseminate 
information but also help increase women's knowledge about the 
disease with adequate consideration of the factors that women feel 
important in their breast cancer prevention.
The research reported here is part of a comprehensive research in 
health communication investigating the relationships between 
Caucasian and African American women's perceptions of breast cancer, 
their knowledge about the disease, and cognitive involvement with 
messages about breast cancer prevention from various sources of news 
media. Using hierarchical regression analyses, the present study 
seeks to build on the relationship between breast cancer and mass 
communication by examining and analyzing the differences in knowledge 
and attitudes toward the disease as a function of use of news media 
between two important groups of women. Although it has been suggested 
that media messages can be effective for behavioral changes such as 
early breast cancer detection specifically in African American women 
(e.g., Ansell et al., 1988), we felt it necessary to examine the 
effects of news media on women's attitudes toward the disease since 
attitudes are closely related to knowledge and religious beliefs that 
more or less determine one's behavior. In addition, we anticipated 
that that the present study would help identify the media sources 
that could be used to effectively reach women with information about 
risks related to breast cancer and its prevention.
Literature Review
The role of mass media in public health communication
Most American adults closely follow health news in the media (e.g., 
Gantz & Wang, 2004). According to a Kaiser Health Poll in July/August 
2004, 42% of the American public closely followed stories about the 
release of new cholesterol guidelines at the time when stories about 
military action and peacekeeping in Iraq (87%) and about the 2004 
U.S. presidential election campaigns (77%) were dominant in the media 
(Kaiser Family Foundation, 2004). In another Kaiser Health Poll in 
September/October 2003, knowledge questions regarding public health 
were answered correctly on average by 56% of those who reported 
following the news story closely versus 40% of those who reported not 
following it closely (Brodie et al., 2003).
In addition to delivering important health news, news media broadcast 
important public service announcements (PSA), alarming reports about 
toxic substances, incidence of diseases, and report critical medical 
breakthroughs, availability and quality of professional healthcare 
organizations, and etc. Further, mass media disseminate health 
information through health campaigns designed specifically to educate 
and informant. In raising public awareness of an illness, news media 
play an important role because it is through various media outlets 
that issues health and illness are placed at the forefront of public 
consciousness (Brashers et al., 2002). The media are also thought to 
be influential in shaping public attitudes toward health-related 
issues such as risk factors for cancer (Hoffman-Goetz, 1999). 
Magazines, for example, were ranked as the third leading source of 
cancer information for women in the U.S. (Meissner et al., 1992), and 
more women rated magazines as more important sources of cancer 
information than did men (Murray & McMillan, 1993).
Health information seeking has a number of important implications for 
health outcomes (e.g., Gantz & Wang, 2004). For example, insufficient 
information can potentially lead to poor decisions about alternative 
treatment regimens (Lerman et al., 1993). Further, previous research 
has shown that patients who are adequately informed about their 
illnesses are better able to maintain a sense of control (Felton & 
Revenson, 1984; Lerman et al., 1993; Viney & Westbrook, 1984) and to 
cope with the uncertainty of the illnesses and their treatments 
(Burish & Lyles, 1983; Evans & Clarke, 1983; Molleman et al., 1986). 
Meanwhile, well-informed patients tend to follow their therapeutic 
plans of care more closely (Eraker, Kirscht, & Becker, 1984). African 
Americans traditionally have been less active seekers of information 
regarding their illnesses than other ethnic groups (Freimuth, Stein, 
& Kean, 1989).
Although it is often asserted that systematic communication can 
improve health behavior, less profound impact of the media has not 
been found (Piotrow et al., 1997). In examining the psychosocial 
mechanisms through which symbolic communication influences human 
thought, affect, and action, Bandura (2001) argued that "[m]ost 
external influences affect behavior through cognitive processes 
rather directly" (p. 267). Human beings are capable of 
self-regulation and proactive in response to environmental events and 
inner forces. On the one hand, cognitive factors help determine what 
environmental events will be observed and how the information 
conveyed through the events will be processed for future use. On the 
other hand, one's knowledge, direct experience, and perceived 
barriers and benefits will come into play and become a critical part 
of the cognitive process that eventually determines whether the 
environmental events will have any lasting effects in one's behavior.
In health reporting the news media are not free of bias and mistakes 
(e.g., Hoffman- Goetz, 1999; Jones, 2004). For example, although 
medical and health-related studies have repeatedly shown that women 
over 40 are more likely to have breast cancer than those younger than 
40, 44 percent of the breast cancer-related advertisements in ten 
top-selling women's magazines and three weekend newspapers in an 
Australian study featured women younger than 40 (Jones, 2004). In 
both print media stories or advertisements, mammographic screening of 
women over 50 was rarely mentioned (Jones, 2004). In a content 
analysis of full-length cancer stories in magazines targeting African 
Americans such as Jet, Ebony, and Essence from 1987 to 1995, 
Hoffman-Goetz (1999) found that more than two-thirds of the stories 
used strong words of shock, anger, panic, and fear to describe 
negative emotions or reactions to an initial diagnosis of cancer. 
Also frequently expressed in the descriptions were pain and side 
effects related to cancer or cancer treatments. On the other hand, 
73% of the documents described positive fatalism related to delivery 
from death and the idea of being a survivor.
Although Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory (1997, 2001) suggests an 
indirect model of media effects, it is not known whether frequent 
consumption of news media is a causal influence on American women's 
knowledge and attitudes toward breast cancer, as far as breast cancer 
prevention is concerned. Nor are we sure what impact, either direct 
or indirect, news media have on perceptions of breast cancer 
messages. Do the media determine the amount of attention that is 
given to a particular message about breast cancer at the individual 
level? And if attention to the media messages is important, how does 
it affect women's attitudes and perceptions of breast cancer? We feel 
exploratory research is still needed to address the issues of how the 
amount of media used to obtain health information, along with other 
barriers to breast cancer prevention such as knowledge and religious 
beliefs, would affect American women's attitudes toward  breast 
cancer prevention. Therefore, we wanted to test our first hypothesis:
H1. The information about breast cancer from various sources of news 
media will be positively related to fear and efficacy of the disease 
in Caucasian and African American women.
The role of religious beliefs in African American women's cancer prevention
Psychological responses such as fear, fatalism, and efficacy have 
been identified as personal factors that inhibit African Americans 
from attending to messages as well as participating in cancer health 
promotion behaviors (Cardwell & Collier, 1981; Long, 1993; Barber et 
al., 1998; Matthews et al., 2002; Lewis & Green, 2000). It has been 
suggested that cultural-based beliefs about the causes of cancer are 
what keep some African American women from seeking medical treatment 
and tests for breast cancer. Although socioeconomic factors such as 
income and social status have been found to account for half of the 
cancer-related deaths in Caucasian women, previous research has shown 
that attitudes and beliefs about causes of cancer are commonplace 
among some African-American women (e.g., Johnson, 1998).
Researchers have begun to speculate that African American women are 
more likely to have been brought up with misinformation about breast 
cancer and its treatment, and their misinformation is directly passed 
down from their mothers and grandmothers. This rationale suggests 
that it is not only important for doctors to be aware of the cultural 
and religious beliefs of their patients, but also that health 
communicators need to be aware of these beliefs in order to create 
advertising messages, campaigns, and appeals that more effectively 
speak to African American women.
In a recent study on the perceptions African American women have 
concerning breast cancer, data show that with respect to cancer, some 
women believe that exposure to "air" causes cancer to grow (MSNBC, 
1999). Moreover, the MSNBC study showed that more African American 
women, compared to their counterparts, believe that "worry" or 
anxieties worsen (or cause) their cancer, that God and prayers will 
heal them of the cancer without a reliance on medical treatments or 
doctors, and/or that the devil caused the cancer. These barriers, in 
particular the thought that God causes or cures cancer, have been 
demonstrated in prior research.
Research conducted by Clarke-Tasker (1993), for example, noted that 
historically, spirituality has played a crucial role in the lives of 
African American women. Consistent with the MSNBC study, African 
American women, it seems, may associate a breast cancer diagnosis to 
a failure to live according to God's will. In a similar study, 
Jennings (1996) concluded that African American women may believe 
that breast cancer screening is futile in the face of God's will 
because God can still inflict breast cancer upon them. Hughes et al. 
(1996) attributed differences in perceptions about breast cancer 
risks to the influence of cultural factors such as the importance of 
interpersonal relationships, spirituality, and time orientation. 
Religious beliefs were found to play an important role in health care 
practices and emotional adjustment of African American cancer 
patients (e.g., Barber et al., 1998; Matthews et al., 2002), and in 
the willingness of attending church-based health promotion programs 
by African Americans (Lewis & Green, 2000). They consequently became 
more reluctant to seek cancer information and relied more on the 
belief that "God is going to take care of me" (Matthews et al., 2002, p. 213).
The above influence of religious beliefs on African American women's 
attitudes toward cancer prevention in general led us to the 
development of our second hypothesis:
H2: African American women scoring higher on religious beliefs will 
report less fear of breast cancer than Caucasian women.
The role of knowledge in cancer prevention
As far as cancer prevention is concerned, knowledge is important 
because it helps people not only better cope with cancer but also do 
the right things to prevent the disease. With adequate knowledge 
about breast cancer, for instance, women are able to look for 
appropriate ways or strategies to deal with the disease; they are 
also able to know what behavior is appropriate and what behavior is 
inappropriate to do in maintaining their health (e.g., Bandura, 1997; 
Denniston, 1981). In addition, adequate knowledge about breast cancer 
helps women develop appropriate attitudes such as lower level of 
breast cancer anxiety (Royak-Schaler et al., 1995; Price et al., 
1992; Frisby, 2002).
On the other hand, general cancer knowledge correlates positively 
with both education and income (e.g., Stone and Siegel, 1986). When 
education was used as a predictor variable in a regression analysis 
of the cancer knowledge index, more of the variance in cancer 
knowledge could be explained by education rather than by income. The 
Stone and Siegel study further supports the idea that ethnicity 
influences level of cancer knowledge. They discovered that even after 
controlling for education, behavioral intentions, and cancer 
anxieties, African Americans had significantly lower levels of 
knowledge of cancer than Caucasians, Asians, and other groups. 
Research conducted by the American Cancer Society (1996) lends 
support to the notion that people from more deprived communities are 
less likely to seek medical care because they may not have health 
insurance or are not able to afford the cost of traveling to a 
medical doctor.  Because they are disproportionately represented 
among the nation's poor (e.g., Squires, 2002), African American women 
are at an increased risk of cancer incidence and mortality.
Further, direct or indirect personal experience in dealing with 
breast cancer is another important factor that influences one's 
knowledge about the disease and hence her motive to seek for 
information related to breast cancer. One's cognitive capacity might 
be diminished if he or she experiences extreme stress or anxiety 
about an unknown illness or medical procedures. For example, some 
African American cancer patients with close family members or friends 
who experienced cancer demonstrated increased fear, suspicion, and 
pessimism about their prognosis (Matthews et al., 2002).
Misperceptions and lack of factual knowledge about breast cancer have 
been explored as barriers to breast cancer-related activities such as 
mammography among African Americans (Royak-Schaler et al., 1995; 
McDonald et al., 1999). In a recent study that assessed breast cancer 
perceptions, knowledge, and screening behavior among 120 low-income 
African-American women residing in public housing, knowledge about 
breast cancer was found to be poor among the women (McDonald et al., 
1999). Lack of factual knowledge about the disease could contribute 
to individuals' misperceptions of the risk factors for breast cancer 
and affect their anxiety about the disease.
In a more recent study, Frisby (2002) conducted a survey of 
ninety-two African American women and discovered that less than 2% of 
women over the age of 40 had either experienced a mammogram or 
conducted self-examinations. Moreover, her data revealed a startling 
fact: African American women were unable to communicate knowledge or 
a clear understanding of the risks associated with breast cancer, 
suggesting that campaigns aimed at increasing awareness are clearly 
important for such a deadly disease.
Thus, the above discussion helped us develop the third hypothesis as follows:
H3: Knowledge of breast cancer and its risks will significantly 
increase perceived efficacy levels for both Caucasian and African 
American women.
Method
Data and Sample
The above hypotheses were tested in a telephone survey of 446 
interviews with U.S. women aged 40 or older conducted from February 
until July 2004, with 240 being Caucasians and 206 African Americans. 
Women aged 40 or older were selected because risk factors for breast 
cancer in this age group tend to be significantly higher (CDC, 2004). 
The respondents were randomly selected from eleven metropolitan areas 
where disparities in cancer outcomes were known to exist. The areas 
included Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Dallas, Detroit, Houston, 
Jacksonville, Kansas City (Missouri), Milwaukee, Nashville, and 
Richmond. In each of the cities, African American women were over 
sampled to make their proportion of the sample equivalent to Caucasians'.
The interviews were completed by trained interviewing and supervising 
staff of an academic survey research center at a Midwestern 
university using random digit dialing (RDD) techniques. The data 
collection was aided within a computer-assisted telephone 
interviewing (CATI) system. The response rate of the survey was 50%, 
using the final codes and definitions for calculating response rate 
provided by The American Association For Public Opinion Research 
(AAPOR, 2000).
Measurement
Dependent variable
The dependent variables of the study were two factors that emerged 
from an exploratory factor analysis of nine question items using the 
maximum likelihood factor extraction method and varimax rotation. The 
first factor, labeled as "fear of breast cancer," consisted of three 
question items: "Getting breast cancer would make me feel isolated 
from other people," "I feel that others would avoid me if I had 
breast cancer," and "Having breast cancer might make being in public 
uncomfortable." The factor displayed an eigenvalue of 2.11. The 
second factor, "efficacy of breast cancer," contained three items: "I 
avoid some behaviors because they may cause breast cancer," "There 
are many things I can do to avoid breast cancer," and I follow some 
behaviors because they may prevent breast cancer." It had an 
eigenvalue of 1.54. Responses to all the six items were coded on a 
7-point Likert scale with 1 being "strongly disagree" and 7 "strongly 
agree." The two factors were not significantly correlated (r = .06, p 
= .17). Combined, they accounted for 61 percent of the total 
variance. Table 2 displays the question items and corresponding 
factor loadings. Factor scores were computed and used in the analysis.
Independent variables
We used five variables to measure one's attention to breast cancer 
information on various channels of television, radio, newspapers, 
magazines, and the Internet. Response categories for the items were 
(1) not at all, (2) a little, (3) some, and (4) a lot. Attention, as 
a measure of one's mental effort (e.g., McLeod & McDonald, 1985; 
Chaffee & Schleuder, 1986), indicates how much one engages his or her 
mind when watching television programs and reading newspapers. When 
making comparison among various media channels (for example, 
television versus newspapers, television versus the Internet), one is 
recommended to use measurement of attention because "adding media 
attention measures to the comparison can reduce the spurious 
influence of third variables on tests of cognitive effects" (Chaffee 
& Schleuder, 1986, p.103).
Because of the importance of religious beliefs in African Americans' 
health care practices and information seeking (e.g., Barber et al., 
1998; Matthews et al., 2002; Lewis & Green, 2000), we averaged the 
scores of seven question items to calculate a composite score of 
"religious beliefs." The seven items (alpha = .91 for Caucasians; 
alpha = .82 for African Americans) included "If I lead a good 
spiritual life, I will stay healthy," "If I stay healthy, it is 
because I am right with God," "I rely on God to keep me in good 
health," "Through my faith in God, I can stay healthy," "My spiritual 
beliefs are the foundation of my whole approach to life," "I am often 
aware of the presence of God in my life," and "I have a personal 
relationship with God." The response categories for the items ranged 
from 1 "strongly disagree" to 7 "strongly agree." A high value of the 
score indicates high level of religious beliefs.
To measure one's knowledge about breast cancer, we used six question 
items: "In terms of risk for breast cancer, age does not play a major 
role," "In terms of risk for breast cancer, family background is 
important," "The age at which a girl has her first period influences 
her risk for breast cancer later in life," "Lifestyle, including diet 
and exercise, is one of the risk factors related to breast cancer," 
"Breast cancer can occur to every adult woman at any time," and 
"Getting a mammogram will keep me from getting breast cancer." 
Respondents were asked whether these six items were true (1) or false 
(0). The item of "In terms of risk for breast cancer, age does not 
play a major role" was reverse coded because age is one of the key 
risk factors for breast cancer (CDC, 2004; NCI, 2004). We then 
created an index of "knowledge about breast cancer" by summing all 
correct responses. A "6" in the index means that a respondent 
answered all the six questions correctly, and a "0" indicates that 
none of her responses was correct.
Demographic and control variables
	The demographic variables included age, education, and income. In 
addition, we controlled for the effects of both direct and indirect 
experiences with breast cancer:  "Have you ever been diagnosed with 
breast cancer?" and "Does anyone in your family have breast cancer?" 
Both variables were dummy coded, with 1 being "yes" and 0 "no."
Analytical procedures
We used multivariate hierarchical regression to test the hypotheses 
in both Caucasian and African American women. In the full model 
(Table 4), the demographic and control variables were entered into 
the equation first. Then, measures of "religious beliefs" and 
"knowledge about breast cancer" were entered in two steps, 
respectively. The purpose was to identify unique contributions, if 
any, that these two variables would make to the prediction of fear 
and efficacy of breast cancer. In the fourth step, five measures of 
attention to breast cancer information in various media were entered 
as one group.
We assessed the significance of the regression models by examining 
the standard incremental F-tests (Cohen & Cohen, 1983). In the 
regression equation, the standardized coefficients were derived from 
the final model and reported in Tables 3. For the incremental F- and 
t-tests, alpha was set at 0.05.
Results
Table 1 displays the descriptive statistics for all the variables 
used in the analysis. Because the survey screened for female 
respondents aged 40 or older, the average age of Caucasian women was 
59.4 years (SD = 12.4), and the African American women's was 55.1 
years (SD = 10.8). On average, Caucasian women had an educational 
level between "two-year junior or community college degree" and "some 
university studies but no degree" (M = 15.7, SD = 2.6), slightly 
higher than their counterparts' (M = 14.7, SD = 3.0). The average 
annual household income of Caucasian women was slightly higher than 
the category of "$30,000 but less than $50,000" (M = 3.2, SD = 1.5), 
whereas African American women on average made between "$20,000 but 
less than $30,000" and "$30,000 but less than $50,000" a year (M = 
2.4, SD = 1.5). In addition, five percent of Caucasian women had been 
diagnosed with breast cancer, compared to three percent of African 
American women. Twenty percent of Caucasian women reported that some 
of their family members had breast cancer, so did 21 percent of 
African American women.
To see whether there would be any significant difference between the 
two samples in religious beliefs, we ran an analysis of variance 
(ANOVA) with post hoc tests. Our analysis revealed a significant 
effect, F(1, 446) = 83.6, p < .000 (adjusted R2 = 16%), with African 
American women (M = 5.97, SD = 0.11) scoring significantly higher on 
religious beliefs than Caucasian women (M = 4.67, SD = 0.10).
Tests of hypotheses
	In our first hypothesis, we anticipated that the information about 
breast cancer from various sources of news media would be positively 
related to fear and efficacy of the disease in Caucasian and African 
American women. As shown in Table 3, when measures of demographics, 
direct and indirect personal experiences, and religious beliefs were 
statistically controlled, attention to radio messages about breast 
cancer was significantly and positively related to efficacy of breast 
cancer for African American women (ß = .32, p = .001), but not for 
Caucasian women. Attention to breast cancer information on the 
Internet was significantly and positively related to the outcome 
variable for Caucasian women (ß = .15, p = .01), but not for the 
African American sample. Television news, newspapers, and magazines, 
were not predictors of efficacy of breast cancer in either of the two 
groups of women.
	As for the other dependent variable of the study, fear of breast 
cancer, the only significant predictor was the use of magazines, as 
it was evident for the African American sample (ß = -.26, p = .01, 
Table 3). This suggests that the more attention African American 
women paid to information about the disease in magazines, the less 
fearful attitudes they developed. None of the other measures of news 
media use was significant for the two groups of women examined here. 
Nevertheless, it should be noted that the media use measures along 
contributed a significant 7% in variance for Caucasian women and 9.7% 
for African American women, respectively, to the variances of 
efficacy of breast cancer accounted for by the equation. The same 
measures contributed a marginally significant 5.2% in variance for 
African American women to the variance of fear of breast cancer, and 
an insignificant 1.2% in variance for Caucasian women.  Thus, 
Hypothesis 1 was only partially supported.
Hypothesis 2 suggested that African American women scoring higher on 
religious beliefs would report less fear of breast cancer than 
Caucasian women. As shown in Table 3, religious beliefs were 
significantly and negatively related to fear of breast cancer for 
African American women (ß = -.16, p = .01), when demographic 
variables and media use measures were statistically controlled. This 
suggests that for the African American women who held stronger 
religious beliefs, they would be less fearful of breast cancer. As 
for the Caucasian sample, the same finding was not evident. 
Noticeably, the measure of religious beliefs along contributed a 
significant amount of two percent in variance in accounting for the 
outcome variable (Table 3), and the predicative power remained 
significant in the full model (Table 4) when the effect of "knowledge 
about breast cancer) was simultaneously examined. For Caucasian 
women, the variance in "fear of breast cancer" accounted for by 
"religious beliefs" was an insignificant 0.4%. Therefore, Hypothesis 
1 was adequately supported.
It should be noted that, when the regression was repeated with 
"efficacy of breast cancer" being the dependent variable, religious 
beliefs were significantly and positively related to the outcome 
variable for Caucasian women (ß =.17, p = .01, Table 3), controlling 
for demographic and media use variables. This finding suggests that 
Caucasian women having a stronger sense of religion feel more control 
in their coping with breast cancer than those with less or no belief 
in religion. In addition, religious beliefs were not a significant 
factor in accounting for efficacy of breast cancer for African 
American women. These findings remained almost unchanged in the full 
model (Table 4).
In Hypothesis 3, we anticipated that knowledge of breast cancer and 
its risks would significantly increase perceived efficacy levels of 
breast cancer for both Caucasian and African American women. In other 
words, women who are knowledgeable about the disease and its 
prevention would report higher efficacy levels than those who are 
less knowledgeable or have no knowledge at all. This hypothesis was 
well supported. Knowledge of breast cancer was significantly and 
positively related to efficacy of the disease for Caucasian women (ß 
= .35, p = .001) as well as for African American women (ß = .19, p > 
.01), when the demographic measures, religious beliefs, and media use 
variables were statistically controlled. Both Caucasian and African 
American women who scored higher on the knowledge index demonstrated 
higher levels of control and efficacy of breast cancer. In addition, 
knowledge of breast cancer by itself noticeably added a significant 
9% and 6.4% in variance to the variances of the outcome variable 
accounted for in the equation in Caucasian and African American 
women, respectively.
Because of the significant predictive power of knowledge about breast 
cancer as evidently mentioned above, we ran another hierarchical 
regression to see what factors, if any, would explain women's 
knowledge. The results are displayed in Table 5. Noticeably, for 
Caucasian women, their knowledge about breast cancer was more 
significantly predicted by the demographic variables as well as 
direct and indirect personal experiences than that of African 
American women, as evident as in the variances of 21.1% and 2.9%, 
respectively. Income was significantly and positively related to 
knowledge for Caucasian women (ß = .21, p = .01), and marginally 
significant for African American women (ß = .11, p = .10). As for the 
Caucasian sample, also significant were age (ß = -.28, p = .001), 
education (ß = .10, p = .10), and direct personal experience in 
dealing with breast cancer (ß = .20, p = .001).
In addition, attention to breast cancer information on the radio was 
significantly and positively related to knowledge about breast cancer 
for Caucasian women (ß = .20, p = .01, Table 5) as well as for 
African American women (ß = .26, p = .01, Table 5), suggesting that 
radio could be an effective source of information about the disease 
for both groups of women. Individually, none of the other media was 
significant. Together, the media use measures were more influential 
to African American women (10.3% in explained variance) than to their 
counterparts (4.3% in explained variance), as far as knowledge about 
breast cancer is concerned. Religious beliefs were marginally 
significant for African American women's knowledge (ß = -.12, p = 
.10, Table 5), but not for Caucasian women's.
Among the demographic variables, age was significantly and positively 
related to efficacy of breast cancer for African American women (ß = 
.15, p = .05, Table 4); it was marginally significant and negatively 
related to fear of breast cancer for Caucasian women (ß = -.11, p = 
.10, Table 4). Income, on the other hand, was significantly and 
negatively related to fear of breast cancer for the Caucasian sample 
(ß = -.18, p = .01, Table 4) as well as for the African American 
sample (ß = -.20, p = .01, Table 4), implying that those who made 
less annual income were more fearful of the disease than those with 
higher incomes. As for the outcome variable of efficacy of breast 
cancer, income was a marginally significant and positive predictor 
for African American women (ß = .12, p = .10, Table 4), but not a 
factor at all for Caucasian women. In addition, the Caucasian women 
who had been diagnosed with breast cancer were less fearful of the 
disease (ß = -.24, p = .001, Table 4). And, the African American 
women whose family members had been diagnosed with breast cancer felt 
less in control of the disease (ß = -.18, p = .01, Table 4). In 
addition, education was not a predictor at all in either Caucasian or 
African American women in accounting for their fear and efficacy of 
breast cancer.
Discussion
In the present study we used two hierarchical multiple regressions to 
see whether knowledge about breast cancer, religious beliefs, and use 
of various sources of news media would influence fear and efficacy of 
the disease in Caucasian and African American women. Fear and 
efficacy of breast cancer have been identified as two important 
concepts in the literature of breast cancer prevention, reflecting 
two opposing attitudes common in women. Because of the importance of 
knowledge in its relations to attitude and behavior in cancer 
prevention at the individual level, we ran another multiple 
regression to identify factors, along with demographic measures, that 
would affect knowledge about breast cancer. Overall, we found 
adequate support for our expectations.
First, use of magazines was a strong predictor of fear of breast 
cancer in African American women (Table 3), and its predictive power 
remained unchanged when the effect of knowledge about breast cancer 
was simultaneously examined (Table 4). This finding suggests that 
magazines could be an effective source of information that can be 
used to help African American women reduce their fear of breast 
cancer. Previous research has shown that magazines are important 
sources of cancer information (e.g., Jones, 2004; Frisby, 2002) and 
particularly heeded  by more women than men (Meissner et al., 1992; 
Murray & McMillan, 1993). Unlike most newspapers that appeal to 
broader and more general audiences, for example, magazines are often 
designed for quite narrow audiences; they are more specialized and 
can more easily be targeted to a niche market interested in certain 
health issues. In addition, magazine articles can devote more space 
to a health issue than can newspapers. Magazines targeting African 
American women are also known for their content and context of 
autobiographical, biographical, or fictionalized 'real life' cancer 
stories (Hoffman-Goetz, 1999). Cognitively, the detailed contents and 
tone of the cancer stories are likely to influence African American 
women of popular magazines in developing less negative perceptions of 
cancer-related information and reducing their fear about breast 
cancer as found in the present study.
The other media outlets examined in the study also showed more or 
less effect in influencing women's attitudes toward breast cancer. 
Attention to messages about breast cancer on the radio was an 
influential factor in explaining African American women's efficacy of 
the disease, and use of the Internet helped increase Caucasian women' 
efficacy (Tables 3 & 4). Our finding that radio was directly related 
to African American women's anxiety about breast cancer suggests that 
this format of broadcasting may deserve adequate attention in the 
domain of health communication. Like television news and newspapers, 
radio focuses on current events and is entirely auditory (Eveland, 
2003). These attributes of the medium may be more attractive to 
African American women than to their counterparts. If used 
appropriately, radio could be an effective approach for public health 
practitioners to reach African American women for breast 
cancer-related issues.
Meanwhile, both television news and newspapers failed to show any 
significant effect. One of the possible explanations is that 
television news and newspapers usually appeal to broader and more 
general audiences and readers and, as a result, they may not devote 
enough space or coverage to a particular health issue more 
interested, say, by women. Although health content is regularly 
featured on local television newscasts, there is a wide variety of 
topics in health news stories and most of the news stories tend not 
to offer contrasting viewpoints (Gantz & Wang, 2004). Nevertheless, 
these differences in media effects reported here suggest that more 
attention needs to be paid to study the unique attributes of various 
media because they may influence how people select and use the media 
for their informational needs for health (e.g., Eveland, 2003; Jones, 
2004; Witte et al., 1993).
The results of the present study also show that stronger religious 
beliefs led to less fear of breast cancer in African American women 
and to more efficacy of the disease in Caucasian women (Tables 3 & 
4). This finding is consistent with previous research and the notion 
that religious beliefs play an important role in emotional adjustment 
about breast cancer in African American women (e.g., Barber et al., 
1998; Matthews et al., 2002; Clarke-Tasker, 1993; Jennings, 1996; 
Hughes et al., 1996). It seems that the stronger religious beliefs 
African American have, the less fearful they feel about breast 
cancer. The positive impact of religious beliefs on Caucasian women's 
efficacy of the disease is noteworthy as well, suggesting that 
religion is not only an important factor that influences women's 
attitudes toward breast cancer, but also churches and church-related 
activities may be an important area for public health professionals 
and alike to focus their educational and promotional resources in 
order to effectively discuss issues related to breast cancer 
prevention with the two groups of women.
Further, the present data provide strong support to the importance of 
knowledge in breast cancer research as well as in its relationship to 
women's attitudes toward control of the disease (Table 4). Knowledge 
about breast cancer was significantly and positively related to 
efficacy of the disease for both groups of women, when demographic 
measures, religious beliefs, and media use variables were 
statistically controlled. The more correct knowledge they had about 
breast cancer prevention, the more in control of preventing the 
disease the women felt. However, our data did not show that knowledge 
was related to fear of breast cancer in both Caucasian and African 
American women. This could suggest that fear of breast cancer may 
have more to do with other factors such as personal experience in 
dealing with the disease for Caucasian women, and religious beliefs 
and use of news media for African American women, as evident in Table 4.
In addition, our results seem to suggest that because knowledge about 
breast cancer has been shown to be relatively poor among African 
American women (Royak-Schaler et al., 1995; McDonald et al., 1999; 
Frisby, 2002), they may pay more attention to the information in the 
media than Caucasian women, as suggested by the finding that the 
amount of variance of knowledge explained by the five media variables 
in the African American sample was 10.3%, compared to 4.3% of the 
variance in the Caucasian women sample (Table 5). Our analysis here 
also shows that demographic measures, including personal experience 
in dealing with breast cancer, played a much more important role in 
accounting for Caucasian women's knowledge than for African 
Americans'. As mentioned earlier, radio was influential in predicting 
knowledge about breast cancer in both samples, suggesting that 
broadcast media could be an important source to disseminate correct 
information about breast cancer and hence increase women's knowledge 
about the disease.
By examining the relationships of religious beliefs, knowledge, and 
use of various sources of news media to women's attitudes toward the 
disease, our study contributes to the understanding of the processes 
associated with acceptance and rejection of breast cancer messages at 
the individual level. From a practical point of view, our results 
imply that, in choosing a media channel or channels to promote 
appropriate attitudes or behaviors, health communicators should 
carefully consider the specific attributes of various media that 
appeal to different audiences. However, due to the correlational 
nature of our data, we could not be certain of the direction of 
causality – whether knowledge influences attitudes toward breast 
cancer or vice versa, for example. A multiwave panel design would 
enhance the quality of the proposed model. In addition, it would 
enable us to draw more sound conclusions regarding the effectiveness 
of various sources of news media for dissemination of useful messages 
about breast cancer had we had measures that tap into the specific 
attributes of different media as suggested by Eveland (2003).

References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of 
behavioral change.
Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. 
Media Psychology,
3(3), 265-266.

Barber, K. R. et al. (1998). Differences between African American and 
Caucasian men
participating in a community-based prostate cancer screening program. 
Journal of Community Health, 23(6), 441-451.

Berman, S. H., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Fear of cancer and knowledge 
of cancer: A review
and proposed relevance to hazardous waste sites. Social Science of 
Medicine, 31(1), 81-90.

Bobo, J. (1995). Black women as cultural readers. New York: Columbia 
University Press.

Brashers, D. E., Goldsmith, D. J., & Hsieh, E. (April, 2002). 
Information seeking and avoiding in
health contexts. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 258-271.

Brodie, M., Hamel, E. C., Altman, D. E., Blendon, R. J., & Benson, J. 
M. (2003). Health news
and the American public, 1996-2002. Journal of Health Politics, 
Policy, and Law, 28(5), 927-950.

Brown, R. S., & Lees-Haley, P. R. (1992). Fear of future illness, 
chemical AIDS, and
cancerphobia: A review. Psychological Reports, 71, 187-207.

Cardwell, J. J., & Collier, W. V.  (1981). Racial differences in 
cancer awareness: What Black
Americans know and need to know about cancer. Urban Health, 12(3), 29-32.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2004). 2003 fact 
sheet – revised May
2004: The national breast and cervical cancer early detection program 
– reducing mortality through screening. Retrieved October 2, 2004 
from http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/about.htm.

Chaffee, S. H., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of 
attention to media news.
Human Communication Review, 13(1), 76-107.

Clark-Tasker, V. A. (1993). Cancer prevention and early detection in 
African Americans. In M.
Frank-Stromborg & S. J. Olsen (Eds.), Cancer prevention in minority 
populations: Cultural implications for health care professionals. St. 
Louis, MO: V. C. Mosby.

Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple 
regression/correlation analysis for the
	behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Coleman, C. (1993). The influence of mass media and interpersonal 
communication on societal
and personal risk judgments. Communication Research, 20(4), 611-628.

Dent, O. W., & Goulston, K. (1982). Community attitudes to cancer. 
Journal of Biosocial
	Science, 14, 359-372.

Denniston, R. W. (1981). Cancer knowledge, attitudes, and practices 
among Black Americans. In
C. Metlin & G. P. Murphy (Eds.), Cancer among Black populations. New 
York: Alan R. Liss.

Easerling, D. V., & Leventhal, H. (1989). Contributions of concrete 
cognition to emotion: neutral
symptoms as elicitors of worry about cancer. Journal of Applied 
Psychology, 74, 787-796.

Eveland, W. P. Jr. (2003). A "mix of attributes" approach to the 
study of media effects and new
communication technologies. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 395-410.

Frisby, C. M. (2002). Messages of hope: Health communication 
strategies that address barriers
preventing Black women from screening for breast cancer. Journal of 
Black Studies, 32(5), 489 – 505.

Gantz, W., & Wang, Z. (2004, August). Health content in local 
television news. Paper presented
at the annual convention of the Association for Education in 
Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC) in Toronto, Canada.

Graber, D. A. (1997). Mass media and American politics. Washington, 
D.C.: Congressional
Quarterly Inc.

Gram, I. T., & Slenker, S. E. (1992). Cancer anxiety and attitudes 
toward mammography among
	screening attenders, nonattenders, and women never invited. American 
Journal of Public
	Health, 82(2), 249-251.

Gutteling, J. M., Seydel, E. R., & Weigman, O. (1986). Perceptions of 
cancer. Journal of
	Psychosocial Oncology, 4(3), 77-91.

Hoffman-Goetz, L. (1999). Cancer experiences of African-American 
women as portrayed in
popular mass magazines. Psycho-Oncology, 8, 36-45.

Holland, R., & Cullen, A. (1986). New insights and attitudes. In A. 
I. Holleb (Ed.), The
American Cancer Society book: Prevention, detection, diagnosis, 
treatment, rehabilitation, cure. New York: Doubleday.

Hughes, C., Lerman, C., & Lustbader, E. (1996). Ethnic differences in 
risk perception among
women at increased risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and 
Treatment, 40, 25-35.

Jennings, K. (1996). Getting black women to screen for cancer. 
Incorporating health beliefs into
practice. Journal of the Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 8(2), 53-59.

Jones, S. C. (2004). Coverage of breast cancer in the Australian 
print media – does advertising
and editorial coverage reflect correct social marketing messages? 
Journal of Health Communication, 9, 309-323.

Kaiser Family Foundation, & Harvard School of Pubic Health (2002). 
Health News Index Poll.
Retrieved October 26, 2004 from http://www.kaisernetwork.org.

Kellner, R., Abbott, P., Winslow, W. W. & Pathak, D. (1987). Fears, 
beliefs, and attitudes in
	DSM-III hypochondriasis. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 
175(1), 20-25.

Lewis, R. K., & Green, B. L. (2000). Assessing the health attitudes, 
beliefs, and
Behaviors of African Americans attending church: A comparison from 
two communities. Journal of Community Health, 25(3), 211-224.

Long, E.  (1993).  Breast cancer in African American women: Review of 
the literature. Cancer
Nursing, 16(1), 1-24.

Matthews, A. K., Sellergren, S. A., Manfredi, C., & Williams, M. 
(2002). Factors influencing
medical information seeking among African American cancer patients. 
Journal of Health Communication, 7, 205-219.

Mattson, M. (1999, September). Toward a reconceptualization of 
communication Cues to action
in the Health Belief Model: HIV test counseling. Communication 
Monographs, 16, 240-265.

McDonald, P. A., Thorne, D. D., Pearson, J. C., & Adams-Campbell, L. 
L. (1999, Winter).
Perceptions and knowledge of breast cancer among African-American 
women residing in public housing. Ethn Dis., 9(1), 81-93.

McLeod, J. M., & McDonald, D. G. (1985, January). Beyond simple exposure: Media
orientations and their impact on political processes. Communication 
Research, 12, 3-33.

Meissner, H. I., Potosky, A. L., & Convissor, R. (1992). How sources 
of health information
relate to knowledge and use of cancer screening exams. Journal of 
Community Health, 17, 153-165.

Murray, M., & McMillan, C. L. (1993). Gender differences in 
perceptions of cancer. Journal of
Cancer Education, 8, 53-62.

National Cancer Institute (NCI, 2004). Quick facts: Annual report to 
the nation on the status of
cancer 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer 
prevention and control. Retrieved October 3, 2004 from 
http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleasese/reportfactsheet
Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., & Becker, M. H. (1988, Summer). 
Social learning theory and
	the health belief model. Health Education Quarterly, 15(2), 175-183.

Royak-Schaler, R., DeVellis, B. M., & Emerson, J. A. (1995). Breast 
cancer in African-
American families: Risk perception, cancer worry, and screening 
practices of first-degree relatives. Annals of the New York Academy 
of Sciences, 768, 281-285.

Speckens, A. E. M., Spinhoven, P., Sloekers, P. P. A., Bolk, J. H., & 
van Hemert, A. M. (1996).
A validation study of the Whitley Index, the Illness Attitude Scales, 
and the Somatosensory Amplification Scale in general medical and 
general practice patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 40(1), 95-104.

Steptoe, A., Horti, J. & Stanton, S. (1986). Concern about cancer in 
women undergoing elective
gynecological surgery. Social Science and Medicine, 23(11), 1139-1145.

Squires, C. (2002). Black audiences, past and present: Commonsense 
media critics and activists.
In R. R. M. Coleman (Ed.), Say it loud! African-American audiences, 
media, and identity (pp. 45-76). New York: Routledge.

The American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2000). 
Standard definitions: Final
dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Ann Arbor, 
Michigan: AAPOR.

Witte, K., Stokols, D., Ituarte, P., & Schneider, M. (1993, August). 
Testing the Health Belief
Model in a field study to promote bicycle safety helmets. 
Communication Research, 20(4), 564-586.

Wood, J. F. (2002). House Negro versus field Negro: The inscribed 
image of race in television
news representations of African-American identity. In R. R. M. 
Coleman (Ed.), Say it loud! African-American audiences, media, and 
identity (pp. 96-114). New York: Routledge.
1
Fear & Efficacy of Breast Cancer
TABLE 1 Descriptive Statistics for Demographic Controls and Media 
Variables Used in the Analysis
																		
      Caucasian Women (n=240)     			African American Women (n=206)	
Variables						Mean		s.d.	    Range			Mean		s.d.	     Range	
																		
Demographics & Controls
     Age							59.36		12.35	    40-87			55.09		10.78	     40-91	
     Education						15.70		2.61	     3-20			14.67		3.03	     1-20
     Income						3.15		1.53	     0-6			2.37		1.51 	     0-6	
     Have you ever been diagnosed with breast cancer 
b 		.05		.22	     0-1			.03		.17	     0-1
     Does anyone in your family have breast cancer 
c		.20		.40	     0-1			.21		.41	     0-1
Attention to breast cancer information in the media
     Attention to breast cancer information on 
TV		2.86		.88	     1-4			3.23		.87	     1-4
     Attention to breast cancer information on the 
radio		2.20		1.04	     1-4			2.39		1.18	     1-4
     Attention to breast cancer information in newspapers 
2.67		1.06	     1-4			1.68		1.14	     1-4
     Attention to breast cancer information in magazines 
2.83		.98	     1-4			2.95		1.04	     1-4
     Attention to breast cancer information on the Internet 
1.90		1.08	     1-4			1.79		1.13	     1-4
																		
Note.	a & b. yes = 1, no = 0.
1
Fear & Efficacy of Breast Cancer
TABLE 3
Hierarchical Multiple Regression Predicting Fear and Efficacy of 
Breast Cancer without Knowledge about Breast Cancer
																		
	            Fear of Breast Cancer				          Efficacy of Breast Cancer
             Caucasians    	     African 
Americans            	            Caucasians    	     African 
Americans 

               (n = 240)	            (n = 206)			              (n = 
240)	            (n = 206)
																		
Step 1
   Age						-0.13*			0.04				  -0.03			0.16*
   Education			 		-0.07			0.05	  			  0.06			-0.03
   Income				    		-0.17* 			-0.18**				  0.08			0.14*
   Have you ever been diagnosed with breast cancer 
a 	-0.22**			-0.09				  0.05			-0.03
   Does anyone in your family have breast cancer b 
0.04			-0.09				  0.00			-0.18**
   Incremental R2 (%)			    	8.8**	    		5.3*				  4.1			6.2*
Step 2
   Religious beliefs				-0.06			-0.16**				  0.17**			0.02
   Incremental R2 (%)				0.4			2.0*				  3.7**			0.7
Step 3
   Attention to breast cancer info on TV		0.05			0.10				  0.08			0.06
   Attention to breast cancer info on the 
radio		-0.09			0.12				  0.11			0.32***
   Attention to breast cancer info in newspapers	0.02			0.15				  -0.05			-0.09
   Attention to breast cancer info in magazines	0.06			-0.26**				  0.11			0.04
   Attention to breast cancer info on the Internet 
0.01			-0.01				  0.15*			-0.05
   Incremental R2 (%)				1.2			5.2 #				  7.0**			9.7**
   Total R2 (%)					10.4			12.5				  14.8			16.6
																		
Note. 	a & b. yes = 1, no = 0.
	Entries are standardized beta coefficients.
# p _ .10, *p _  .05, **p _ .01, ***p _  .001.
TABLE 4
Full Hierarchical Multiple Regression Predicting Fear and Efficacy of 
Breast Cancer
																		
	            Fear of Breast Cancer				          Efficacy of Breast Cancer
             Caucasians    	     African 
Americans            	            Caucasians    	     African 
Americans 

               (n = 240)	            (n = 206)			              (n = 
240)	            (n = 206)
																		
Step 1
   Age						-0.11 #			0.03				  0.06			0.15*
   Education			 		-0.08			0.05	  			  0.03			-0.02
   Income				    		-0.18** 			-0.20**				  0.00			0.12 #
   Have you ever been diagnosed with breast cancer 
a 	-0.24***			-0.10				  -0.02			-0.05
   Does anyone in your family have breast cancer b 
0.04			-0.10				  0.01			-0.18**
   Incremental R2 (%)			    	8.8**	    		5.0*				  4.1			6.2*
Step 2
   Religious beliefs				-0.05			-0.15*				  0.20**			0.05
   Incremental R2 (%)				0.4			2.0*				  3.7**			0.7
Step 3
   Knowledge about breast cancer			0.08			0.10				  0.35***		0.19**
   Incremental R2 (%)				1.2			1.4				  9.0***			6.4***
Step 4
   Attention to breast cancer info on TV		0.05			0.10				  0.08			0.06
   Attention to breast cancer info on the 
radio		-0.11			0.09				  0.04			0.27**
   Attention to breast cancer info in newspapers	0.02			0.15				  -0.06			-0.09
   Attention to breast cancer info in magazines 
0.07			-0.26**				  0.16*			0.04
   Attention to breast cancer info on the Internet 
0.01			-0.01				  0.16*			-0.07
   Incremental R2 (%)				1.5			4.6				  7.1**			6.6*
   Total R2 (%)					10.9			13.2				  23.9			19.8
																		
Note. 	a & b. yes = 1, no = 0.
	Entries are standardized beta coefficients.
# p _ .10, *p _  .05, **p _ .01, ***p _  .001.

1
Fear & Efficacy of Breast Cancer
TABLE 2
Questionnaire Items & Factor Loadings for Perceived Fear and Efficacy 
of Breast Cancer
												
						          Factor 1		 	Factor 2
Questionnaire item				Fear of Breast Cancer 	Efficacy of Breast Cancer
												
1. Getting breast cancer would make me feel
     isolated from other people.            			0.73			    0.06

2. I feel that others would avoid me if I had breast 
cancer.        0.60			    0.10	

3. Having breast cancer might make being in public
     uncomfortable.          					0.63			    0.06

4. I avoid some behaviors because they may cause
     breast cancer.					     	0.16			    0.60

5. There are many things I can do to avoid breast cancer. 	0.04			    0.52

6. I follow some behaviors because they may prevent
     breast cancer.						0.11			    0.74
												
Note.
	1. n = 446.

TABLE 5
Hierarchical Multiple Regression Predicting Knowledge about Breast Cancer
											
             Caucasians    	     African 
Americans 

               (n = 240)	            (n = 206)	
											
Step 1
   Age						-0.28***			0.07
   Education			 		0.10 #			-0.04	
   Income				    		0.21** 			0.11#
   Have you ever been diagnosed with breast cancer a	0.20***			0.08
   Does anyone in your family have breast cancer b	-0.02			0.01
   Incremental R2 (%)			    	21.1***    		2.9
Step 2
   Religious beliefs				-0.08			-0.12 #
   Incremental R2 (%)				0.3			0.03
Step 3
   Attention to breast cancer info on TV		0.00			0.01
   Attention to breast cancer info on the radio		0.20**			0.26**
   Attention to breast cancer info in newspapers	0.02			0.03
   Attention to breast cancer info in magazines	-0.14			-0.01
   Attention to breast cancer info on the Internet	-0.04			0.13
   Incremental R2 (%)				4.3*			10.3**
   Total R2 (%)					25.8			13.5
											
Note. 	a, b, c, & d. Yes = 1, No = 0.
	Entries are standardized beta coefficients.
# p _ .10, *p _  .05, **p _ .01, ***p _  .001.

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main AEJMC Page

Permalink



LIST.MSU.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager