STeve Andre' <[log in to unmask]> writes:

> On Tuesday 19 April 2005 16:21, m. kolb wrote:
>> Peter J Murray <[log in to unmask]> writes:
>> > Something that comes up all the time is the fact that people are
>> > brushing up against their 64mb quota  Its not the quota that bothers
>> > them so much (although 64 doesn't seem as big as it used to), it's that
>> > they have no notice other than the fact that they stop receiving
>> > emails.  Is there some plan to offer at least a notification service
>> > (and perhaps even a soft quota) via email to let users know that they
>> > are hitting the ceiling, or are at least close?
>>
>> This is being considered.
>>
>> ./muk
>
> Realizing fully that money does not grow on trees, I think that raising
> the 64M default should be considered.  I'm getting an amazing (well,
> depressing) amount of spam these days, and have actually hit that
> limit when I've been busy and not looked at it for a while.

I know that this is also being considered.

./muk