|
Understanding Consumer Intention to Shop Online: A Comparison of Three Intention-Based Models
Jae-Jin Park* Doctoral Candidate Missouri School of Journalism
Address: 1700 Forum Blvd. #305 Columbia, MO 65203 Telephone: 573) 446-6033 E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Glen T. Cameron Professor Missouri School of Journalism
Address: School of Journalism University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, MO 65211 Telephone: 573) 884-2607 E-mail: [log in to unmask]
*Correspondence concerning this manuscript should be addressed to Jae-Jin Park.
A manuscript submitted to the Communication Theory and Methodology Division of AEJMC for possible presentation at the convention to be held in Kansas City, MO, July 30 – August 2, 2003.
Understanding Consumer Intention to Shop Online: A Comparison of Three Intention-Based Models
Abstract
By using a sample of 733 consumers, this study employed path analysis to compare three intention-based models (i.e., the theory of reasoned action, the theory of planned behavior, and the technology acceptance model) in terms of the extent to which each can be used to predict and understand the consumer's online-shopping intention. This study found that the theory of planned behavior provides a more robust theoretical basis for the study of online shopping than does the theory of reasoned action. The significant roles of usefulness and ease of use in this study confirm that the technology acceptance model can be successfully applied to the domain of online shopping beyond information systems usage.
Understanding Consumer Intention to Shop Online: A Comparison of Three Intention-Based Models
Introduction
Although the Internet has a short history, it has dramatically changed the way firms do business and the way consumers purchase products or services. Besides working as an interactive communication channel, the Internet serves as a market with the development of its technologies and its interactivity (Hoffman and Novak, 1977). Because the Internet provides users with rapid access to a variety of information and the ability to easily compare competitors and prices, the market represented by the Internet has "the potential to be a more efficient market than conventional markets." (Hoffman and Novak, 1997, p.50) These distinctive features of the Internet are leading to the increased popularity of online shopping. Online shoppers are expected to increase from 64.1 million in 2000 to more than 100 million by 2003 (Jupiter direct, 2002). The U.S. Department of Commerce estimated that online retail sales reached $10.2 billion in the second quarter of 2002, up 24.2 percent from the second quarter of 2001 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2002). Although reports about the number of online shoppers and e-commerce revenues yield a variety numbers, it is agreed that such numbers have dramatically increased every year. The rapid growth of online shopping has led researchers to devote their efforts to expanding our understanding of the ways consumers shop online. Researchers have explored a variety of factors that might affect consumers' decisions to shop online. Researchers have examined the roles of such influences as Website design characteristics (Chau, Au, and Tam, 2000), demographic characteristics (Donthu and Garcia, 1999; Fram and Grady, 1995), product or service types (Peterson, Balasubramanian, and Bronnenberg, 1997; Phau and Poon, 2000), and emotional/motivational factors (Goldsmith, 2000; Koufaris, 2002; Limayem, Khalifa, and Frini, 2000; Swaminathan, Lepkowska-White, and Rao, 1999). Although those studies provide critical insights into understanding the consumer's online-shopping behavior, most research in this area has been exploratory. Little research has contributed to theoretical developments in this area. The lack of a strong theoretical framework to investigate the consumer's online-shopping behavior may negatively influence the validity of research in this area. Thus, it is important to revisit existing consumer-behavior theories to test their applicability in the context of online shopping. Because online shopping allows the consumer to use only two senses (i.e., sight and sound), whereas offline shopping permits use of all five senses (i.e., sight, sound, feel, smell, and taste), and because online shopping requires the consumer to extensively use a technology (i.e., specifically the Internet in this study), the consumer's online shopping behavior needs to be understood from different perspectives than does conventional shopping behavior. Based on the assumption that an individual's behaviors are under his/her volitional control, the theory of reasoned action (TRA) was developed to predict and understand an individual's psychological processes that influence a certain behavior (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975; Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980). The TRA posits that an individual's psychological responses intervene between social pressures and personal factors (Abdul-Gader and Kozar, 1995). As an extended model of the TRA, the theory of planned behavior (TPB) was developed to explain an individual's behavior under non-volitional as well as volitional control. The main difference between the two theories is that the TPB accounts for non-volitional factors, such as opportunities and resources required for performing a behavior, as determinants of behavioral intentions or behaviors. Since the TRA and the TPB have been successfully adopted to predict and understand a variety of behaviors, they may also provide theoretical frameworks with studies that investigate the consumer's online-shopping behavior. Based on these theories, we can assume that before the consumer purchases products or services through the Internet, s/he would have intention to perform the behavior. This intention is based on how s/he personally feels about online shopping, what important-others think about shopping online, and whether or not s/he has opportunities or resources to shop online. The technology acceptance model (TAM), which has its theoretical background in the TRA, was developed to predict and understand an individual's information systems acceptance in the workplace (Davis, 1989). Compared to the TRA and the TPB, the distinctive feature of the TAM is that it is specific and simple, identifying a salient belief set (i.e., perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use) as antecedents of behavioral intention. Because online shopping also requires consumers to extensively use computer technologies, it is necessary to involve the two constructs of the TAM (i.e., usefulness and ease of use) in a study that examines the consumer's intention to shop online. Although numerous studies have successfully employed the three intention-based models (i.e., the TRA, the TPB, and the TAM) in a variety of situations, little research has been conducted to compare the explanatory powers of the three models in predicting and understanding consumers' online-shopping intentions. The lack of research in this area led the authors to compare the three intention-based models in terms of the extent to which each can be used to predict and understand the consumer's online-shopping behavior. Results of this study will indicate whether all three of the given models are adequate to explain the consumer's online shopping behavior, will identify the relative strengths of each model, and suggest which model would be more useful than the others. The authors hope that answering these questions contributes to the development of the three models, providing future research in the area of online consumer behavior with a more robust theoretical foundation.
Literature review The theory of reasoned action Based on the studies of social psychology, Fishbein and Ajzen (1975) and Ajzen and Fishbein (1980) developed the theory of reasoned action (TRA) to predict and understand an individual's behavior. They assumed that human beings are rational or motivation-based, so humans systematically use the information available to them and consider the implications of their behaviors "before they decide to engage or not engage in a given behavior." (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980, p.5) According to the TRA (see Figure 1), behavioral intention (BI) is the immediate antecedent of an individual's performance of a behavior. The TRA posits that "most behaviors of social relevance are under volitional control and are thus predictable from intention." (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980, p.41) [Insert Figure 1 here] The TRA specifies that behavioral intention is a function of two determinants: a personal factor termed "attitude toward the behavior" (A) and a person's perception of social pressures termed "subjective norm" (SN). The former refers to "[an] individual's positive or negative evaluation of performing the behavior," (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980, p.6) whereas the latter refers to an individual's perception of important-others' desire for him/her to perform or not perform a behavior (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980; Ajzen and Madden, 1986). That is, the TRA assumes that an individual's behavioral intention is a weighted function of his/her positive evaluations of behaviors in question and his/her perception that significant referents think s/he should perform them (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980). That is, Behavioral intention = w1A + w2SN The TRA reaches its boundary at the determinants of attitude and subjective norm, called behavioral and normative beliefs respectively, to predict a behavior. In other words, attitude is a function of a set of beliefs (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980). A behavioral belief refers to an individual's subjective probability that a behavior will lead to a certain consequence (e.g., it saves time to use the Internet for shopping) (Davis, Bagozzi, and Warshaw, 1989). According to the TRA, the strength of each behavioral belief (bi) is multiplied by the evaluation of its consequence (ei), and attitude is determined by summing the resulting products across all salient behavioral beliefs. The evaluation is defined as "an implicit evaluative response to the consequence." (Davis et. al., 1989, p.984) Thus, attitude can be illustrated as Attitude = Subjective norm is also a function of a set of beliefs termed normative beliefs. Normative beliefs "are concerned with the likelihood that important referent individuals or groups would approve or disapprove of performing the behavior." (Ajzen and Madden, 1986, p.455) According to the TRA, to obtain an estimate of a subjective norm, each normative belief (nbi) of an individual is first multiplied by his/her motivation to comply with the referent (mci). Then, the cross-products are summed for all salient referents. That is, Subjective norm = Only a few studies adopted the TRA to predict the consumer's online-shopping behavior. Through a nationwide mail survey with a sample of 355 subjects, Yoh (1999) found that both attitude and subjective norm significantly contribute to the prediction of Internet apparel shopping intention, and the determinants of the factors (i.e., attitude and subjective norm) are their corresponding beliefs. Shim and Drake (1990) also revealed similar results in the context of electronic apparel shopping. Although the psychological processes of the TRA have been demonstrated to be applicable in understanding a variety of behaviors, it has been argued that the predictive power of the TRA may be weak because it was designed to predict only behaviors under volitional control. Although some behaviors can be explained based on the logic of the TRA, under some circumstances, an individual's behavior can be determined by non-volitional factors such as opportunities and resources (e.g., time, money, and skills). For example, even if a consumer has a favorable attitude and subjective norm toward online shopping, s/he cannot afford it if s/he cannot access or operate the Internet. In 1985, Ajzen proposed an extension of the TRA to account for non-volitional factors that can be determinants of behavioral intention or behavior as explained in the next section.
The theory of planned behavior The theory of planned behavior (TPB) is an extension of the TRA. As Figure 1 presents, the only difference between the TRA and the TPB is that the TPB takes account for non-volitional control, named "perceived behavioral control," over the behavior. Perceived behavioral control is defined as the individual's perception "as to how easy or difficult performance of the behavior is likely to be." (Ajzen and Madden, 1986, p.457) As Figure 1 shows, perceived behavioral control influences behavior directly as well as indirectly. The direct approach is based on the assumption that, holding intention constant, the individual's effort or confidence to successfully perform a behavior in question strongly influences performance of the behavior (Ajzen, 1991). For example, a person who, although inexperienced, is more confident in his/her ability to use the Internet is more likely to succeed in shopping online than an unconfident inexperienced person (Ajzen, 1991; George, 2002). However, a direct relation between perceived behavioral control and actual behavior becomes strong only under two conditions: (1) when the behavior in question is completely non-volitional and (2) when perceived behavior control accurately reflects actual control (Ajzen and Madden, 1986). With respect to indirect effects of perceived behavioral control on behavior, the TPB posits that behavioral intention is an immediate determinant of behavior and that behavioral intention is determined by attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control with relative weights (w). That is, Behavioral intention = w1A + w2SN + w3PBC Just as attitude and subjective norm are affected by behavioral and normative beliefs respectively, perceived behavioral control is also a function of beliefs, termed control beliefs. Control beliefs refer to the individual's perception of the extent to which s/he possesses internal and external factors that may increase or decrease the perceived difficulty of performing the behavior. Internal factors include such variables as individual differences, information, skills, abilities, power of will, emotions, and compulsions, whereas external factors involve time, opportunity, and dependence of others (Ajzen, 1985). To obtain an estimate of perceived behavioral control, each control belief (cbi) is multiplied by the perceived power of the control factor to facilitate or inhibit performance of the behavior (ppi), and the resulting products are summed across all salient control beliefs. That is, Perceived behavioral control = Recently, a few studies adopted the TPB to explain the consumer's online-shopping behavior. George (2002) investigated predictors that influence online shopping by using the secondary data of the tenth World Wide Web user survey conducted in October 1998 by Graphics, Visualization and Usability. Although he said that his study was based on the TPB, it seemed to be based on the TRA rather than the TPB because he did not investigate the effects of subjective norm and perceived behavioral control on intention to shop online. The results revealed that actual online shopping was a function of intention, and intention, in turn, was a function of attitude. Limayem, Khalifa, and Frini (2000) demonstrated that intention to shop online is a function of attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control. They also found that intention and perceived behavioral control equally contribute to the prediction of actual online shopping. These results imply that online shopping is low in volitional control and requires adequate resources and opportunities to successfully perform. Thus, we expect that the predictive power on intention of the TPB would be greater than that of the TRA in the context of online shopping. Previous studies also demonstrated that the TPB has a greater power in predicting and understanding behaviors than does the TRA. They include predicting unethical behavior (Chang, 1998) and students' getting an "A" in a class (Ajzen and Madden, 1986). Note that because the TPB encompasses all constructs of the TRA as an extension model of the TRA, this study presents hypotheses based on the TPB.
Hypothesis 1: The TPB has better explanatory power than the TRA in predicting the consumer's online-shopping intention.
Hypothesis 2a-2c: In the online-shopping context, there are positive relationships between (a) behavioral belief and attitude, (b) normative belief and subjective norm, and (c) control belief and perceived behavioral control.
Hypothesis 3a-3c: In the online-shopping context, the consumer's intention to shop online is a function of the following determinants: (a) attitude, (b) subjective norm, and (c) perceived behavioral control.
The technology acceptance model Based on the TRA, Davis (1989) developed the technology acceptance model (TAM) (see Figure 2) to explain the individual's information systems (IS) acceptance behavior. The most distinctive feature of the TAM is that it is specific and simple. That is, the TAM uses a salient belief set (i.e., perceived usefulness (U) and perceived ease of use (EOU)) that is consistently applicable across various situations. Perceived usefulness is defined as "the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would enhance his or her job performance." (Davis, 1989, p.320) On the other hand, perceived ease of use is defined as "the degree to which a person believes that using a particular system would be free of effort." (Davis, 1989, p.320) [Insert Figure 2 here] Consistent with the TRA, the TAM posits that IS usage is a function of behavioral intention. However, in the TAM, behavioral intention to use IS is determined by attitude toward using the system, which reflects an individual's positive or negative evaluation of using the system, and a belief, perceived usefulness, with relative weights (w). That is, Behavioral intention = w1A+ w2U As the TRA posits that attitude is a function of a belief set, the TAM identifies that attitude toward using a system is determined by two specific beliefs (i.e., perceived usefulness and ease of use) with relative weights. With respect to the impact of usefulness on attitude, Davis et. al. (1989) insisted that although the individual's attitude toward a behavior may differ from attitude toward any possible reward as an outcome of the behavior, positively perceived outcomes often improve the individual's attitude toward achieving those outcomes. Davis et. al. (1989) also insisted that ease of use directly influences attitude toward IS usage. This is because individuals who believe that a system is easy to interact with are more likely to increase their sense of self-efficacy. This, in turn, influences attitude, effort persistence, and motivation to use the system. Thus, attitude can be illustrated as Attitude = w3U + w4EOU Increasing ease of use may also increase performance. Increasing ease of use maximizes efficiency of effort, allowing an individual to accomplish more work for his/her effort. A change in weighted ease of use will also proportionally affect usefulness. Thus, usefulness can be illustrated as Usefulness = w5EOU Although the TAM originates from the theoretical background of the TRA, the two models have several different theoretical assumptions in explaining the relationship between behavioral intention and other predetermined factors affecting behavioral intention. First, contrary to the TRA, the TAM does not include subjective norm as a determinant of behavioral intention. Davis et. al. (1989) noted that although subjective norm is an important factor in predicting individual behavior, the TRA has theoretical problems in conceptualizing subjective norm. Specifically, they asserted that It is difficult to distinguish direct effects of subjective norm on behavioral intention from indirect effects via attitude; in addition, attitude may influence subjective norm, for example, due to the false consensus effect in which people project their attitudes to others. (p.986)
Second, a salient belief set should be elicited to explain each behavior in the TRA. The TRA is not based on a specific behavior; therefore, each behavior requires its distinctive and specific belief set (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980). On the other hand, the TAM uses a specific belief set (i.e., usefulness and ease of use) that may be consistently applicable across a variety of situations. Third, the TAM considers its two beliefs (i.e., usefulness and ease of use) as "distinct but related constructs." (Davis et. al., 1989, p.987) In contrast, all behavioral beliefs of the TRA are multiplied by their corresponding evaluations, and then the cross-products are summed. Finally, the direct relationship between usefulness and behavioral intention in the TAM violates the basic assumption of the TRA that attitude mediates the relationship between beliefs and behavioral intention (Taylor and Todd, 1995). According to Davis et. al. (1989), this violation originates from the concept that within organizations, people evaluate behaviors in terms of how they will increase their job performance instead of on the emotional reactions the behavior may receive. The researchers suggest that this is due to the importance of performance in achieving rewards for the work. The TAM has been predominantly applied to predict and understand user acceptance of IS (e.g. Chau and Hu, 2001; Davis, 1989; Malhotra and Galletta, 1999; Taylor and Todd, 1995). However, the results of TAM studies are inconsistent in predicting causal links between constructs in the TAM, especially between attitude and intention. Thus, some current TAM studies (e.g., Gefen and Straub, 2000; Lederer et. al., 2000; Teo, Lim, and Lai, 1999; Venkatesh and Davis, 1996; Venkatesh and Morris, 2000) have measured direct effects of usefulness and ease of use on technology usage intention or actual technology usage by excluding attitude. This method of research has been based on the assumption that attitude does not function as a strong mediating variable between the two beliefs (i.e., usefulness and ease of use) and behavioral intention as originally expected (Chau and Hu, 2001). In this study, however, attitude has been retained to test the TAM because one of objectives of this study is to fairly compare validations of the TRA, the TPB, and the TAM in predicting the individual's online-shopping behavior. The three theories articulate that the effects of beliefs on behavioral intention are mediated by attitude. Rich literature (e.g., Davis et. al., 1989; Limayem et. al., 2000; Mathieson, 1991; Taylor and Todd, 1995) about the TRA, the TPB, and the TAM has also demonstrated that attitude takes an important role in the individual's decision to perform a behavior in question. For example, in a model comparison study, Mathieson (1991, p.187) reported that the "TAM explained attitude toward using an IS much better than [the] TPB." Since online shopping requires the consumer to extensively use Internet technologies, the TAM can be applied to predict and understand the consumer's intention to shop online. Considering the Internet as a system, it can be expected that the more the consumers believe that using the Internet will enhance their "shopping productivity" (e.g., perceived usefulness) and will be easy to use (e.g., perceived ease of use), the more they will use it for shopping (Koufaris, 2002, p.209). As Table 1 shows, previous research has demonstrated that the TAM is applicable to online shopping and World Wide Web studies. Based on the assumption that the effect of ease of use on information technology usage depends on the nature of the task, Gefen and Straub (2000) investigated roles of usefulness and ease of use in two situations: an extrinsic task (e.g., purchasing products online) and an intrinsic task (e.g., inquiring about products through the Internet). They found that while both usefulness and ease of use significantly influenced the intrinsic task, only usefulness had a positive relationship with the extrinsic task. They concluded that "extrinsic motivation is more important than intrinsic motivation in IT adoption," (p.19) and many subsequent TAM studies (e.g., Chau and Hu, 2001; Koufaris, 2002) have supported this assertion. [Insert Table 1 here] Model comparison studies have been conducted to identify which model is more likely to be suitable to predict user acceptance of IS. For example, Davis et. al. (1989) compared the TRA and the TAM in terms of acceptance of a word-processing program with 107 MBA students, and they found that the TAM explained more variances of intention than did the TRA. Results of previous studies comparing the TPB and the TAM have been inconsistent. In a study investigating a physician's intention to adopt technology, Chau and Hu (2001) found that the TAM is better than the TPB in explaining the variance of behavioral intention. Mathieson (1991) also found a similar result in a study of user acceptance of a spreadsheet. He, however, insisted that it is difficult to determine that one model is better than the other because the difference is not large. In addition, he mentioned that while the "TAM supplies very general information about ease of use and usefulness, [the] TPB delivers more specific information, measuring the system's performance on various outcomes." (p.187) On the other hand, Taylor and Todd (1995) found that although both the TAM and the TPB have the same predictive power on actual usage behavior, the TPB explains more variance of behavioral intention than does the TAM. Riemenschneider (1997) also demonstrated that the TPB accounts for a small firm's intention to adopt an IS slightly more than does the TAM.
Hypothesis 4: The TPB has better explanatory power than the TAM in predicting the consumer's online-shopping intention.
Hypothesis 5: Ease of use is positively related to usefulness.
Hypothesis 6: Ease of use and usefulness are both positively related to attitude toward online shopping.
Hypothesis 7: Usefulness and attitude are both positively related to intention to shop online.
Methodology Measures Since the TPB was not developed to predict and understand a specific behavior, analyzing a behavior in question requires eliciting its distinctive and specific belief set (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980). They suggest three tactics for eliciting a belief set:
1. Beliefs may be the results of direct observation 2. [Beliefs] may be acquired indirectly by accepting information from outside sources 3. [Beliefs] are self-generated through inference processes. (p.63)
They also asserted that it would be the simplest and most direct method to ask subjects to describe the attitude object using "a free-response format," (p.63) and that method has been applied most frequently in TPB studies (e.g., Limayem et. al., 2000; Mathieson, 1991). However, the authors of this study chose to indirectly elicit beliefs from extensive study of prior literature in online shopping rather than from interviews with potential subjects. This choice was made for two reasons: (1) to use scales that have been validated in previous research and (2) to compare three models (i.e., the TRA, the TPB, and the TAM) in a similar situation by using two specific components of the TAM (i.e., usefulness and ease of use) across the other models. Four salient consequences that influence adoption of the Internet for shopping were included to measure behavioral beliefs: usefulness, ease of use, playfulness, and trust. Previous research has consistently demonstrated the significant effects of both playfulness (Koufaris, 2002; Moon and Kim, 2001; Webster, Trevino, and Ryan, 1993) and trust (Heijden and Verhagen, 2002; Jarvenpaa and Todd,1997; Jarvenpaa and Tractinsky, 1999) on consumers' intentions to shop online or to use World Wide Web. This study measures online shopping playfulness in terms of cognitive enjoyment. More specifically, this study considers the extent to which the consumer's cognitive curiosity is aroused when interacting with the Internet for shopping and the extent to which the consumer finds the interaction with the Internet for shopping intrinsically enjoyable and interesting (Moon and Kim, 2001; Webster et. al., 1993). With respect to trust, this study defines trust as "the subjective probability with which consumers believe that [Web vendors] will perform a particular interaction in a manner consistent with [consumers'] expectations." (Stewart, Pavlou, and Ward, 2002, p.361) The definition of trust in this study involves three dimensions: perception of security, perception of privacy, and perception of product quality. Based on Limayem et. al. (2000), three referent groups were included to measure normative beliefs: friends, family, and media. Control beliefs consisted of self-efficacy and technology facilitating conditions. Self-efficacy refers to the individual's perception of "how well [s/he] can execute courses of action required to deal with prospective situations." (Bandura, 1982, p.122) According to social cognitive theory, self-efficacy works as a crucial factor governing the individual's behavior (Bandura, 1986). In the online shopping context, self-efficacy can be defined as the individual's perception of efficacy in purchasing products through the Internet (Marakas, Yi, and Johnson, 1998). Self-efficacy has been found to influence in online shopping behavior (Limayem et. al., 2000) and computer usage (Compeau and Higgins, 1995). Facilitating conditions can be defined as "objective factors, out there in the environment, that several judges or observers can agree make an act easy to do." (Triandis, 1979, p.205) In the context of online shopping, effective technological supports (e.g., fast download speed, easy access to Web stores, and efficient transaction process) of Web stores can be considered as a type of facilitating condition. Limayem et. al. (2000) reported that technology facilitating conditions were positively associated with Internet shopping behavior directly and indirectly through intention. Table 2 shows scales used to measure constructs of this study. All items were measured with 7-point scales. As Fishbein and Ajzen (1975) suggested, all items were adapted to specifically measure the consumer's online shopping behavior. Appendix C shows sample items. [Insert Table 2 here] Measures of intention, attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, usefulness, and ease of use were checked for reliability using Cronbach's alpha and revealed reliable estimates: .99, .93, .83, .91, .90, and .92 respectively. In the analyses, multiple items consisting of those constructs were summed together for each construct, and these sums were then divided by the numbers of the items included. Sets of behavioral beliefs, normative beliefs, and control beliefs were not subject to Cronbach's alpha of internal consistency because each belief construct was estimated by summing all products of two items (e.g., a behavioral belief (b) and its consequence (e)) across all beliefs in each construct. By the same token, Harrison, Mykytyn, and Riemenschneider (1997, p.182) asserted that Fishbein and Ajzen (1975) and Ajzen and Fishbein (1980) strongly rule against calculating [reliability estimates for sets of beliefs] because it is reasonable to assume that people will possess contrasting (positive and negative) beliefs about the particular attributes of any reasonably complex course of action. In a sense, then, internal consistency estimates such as coefficient alpha for [_biei, _nbimci, and _cbippi] would not be meaningful because such estimates assume a homogeneous unidimensional construct.
Data collection Zoomerang research company, a corporation specializing in sampling for online surveys and online marketing research, hosted the online survey for this study. Specifically, the company generated the sample for this study from its database of registered panelists, sent invitation e-mails to potential respondents, and automatically collected response data in a spreadsheet format. The invitation e-mail contained an introduction to the purpose of the study and the Website URL for the actual survey. The Website was also provided by the company. Respondents could connect to the survey Website by clicking the URL embedded in the e-mail. The survey was conducted from the end of November to early December 2002. A stratified random sample of 4,000 potential respondents was initially drawn from Zoomerang's zSample database of registered panelists. The sample for this study was generated to be representative of U.S. Internet users, based on Harris Interactive's study depicting the profile of U.S. Internet users (Greenspan, 2002). A week after sending the first invitation e-mail, Zoomerang sent a reminder e-mail to potential respondents who had not yet responded. At this time, another invitation e-mail was also sent to an additional 500 panelists between the ages of 18 and 29. Because the company allows researchers to check survey responses hours or even minutes after deploying their surveys, the authors were able to note the low response rate of this age group – statistically the largest group of Internet users – from the first invitation e-mail. The additional 500 invitations helped supplement this demographic so that the respondent group would match the profile of the U.S. online population. Of a sample of 4,500 potential respondents, a total of 807 respondents completed surveys.
Evaluation of assumptions Prior to main analyses, data screening and an evaluation of assumptions were preformed with a sample of 807 responses. Twenty eight cases were deleted because of severe missing values, leaving 779 cases. In a handful of cases, values randomly left out were replaced by the expectation-maximization method through SPSS MVA. The assumptions of normality and linearity were satisfactory. Thirty four cases that had extremely low or high z scores (z _ _ 3.29, p < .001) were found to be univariate outliers and deleted from analyses. Using Mahalanobis distance, 12 cases were multivariate outliers (p < .001) and also deleted. Multicollinearity and singularity were not a threat in this data set. Analyses for this study were performed using data from 733 respondents.
Sample description Of a sample of 4,500 prospective respondents, a total of 807 respondents completed surveys, and 733 valid responses were used for analyses. The overall response rate was 17.9 percent. The respondents' profile is presented in Table 3. The total number of respondents within each demographic group is different because of missing values. Of the eligible respondents, slightly more than 50 percent were male. In terms of age, both age groups of 18 to 29 and 40 to 49 showed high response rate. The two age groups took approximately 57 percent of the respondents. The majority of respondents were white (86 percent). For income, respondents were fairly distributed within four household income categories except the category of less than $20,000 (6 percent). The majority of respondents (58 percent) reported their education level as college graduate or higher. About 54 percent were married, and 46 percent were single. [Insert Table 3 here]
Findings Using AMOS 4.0 with a maximum-likelihood estimation, path analysis was conducted to test the hypothesized models and paths in the models. To assess models, this study used five indices: the x2 statistic, the goodness-of-fit index (GFI), the adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI), the normed fit index (NFI), and the comparative fit index (CFI). Although the x2 is the most common fit test, it was not significantly considered to assess the fit of the model because the x2 is very sensitive to sample size (Baumgartner and Homburg, 1996). It has been reported that the x2 test is not a good index for model fit when the sample is large (Baumgartner and Homburg, 1996; Marsh, Balla, and McDonald, 1988). A chi-square greater than .05, a GFI greater than .90, an AGFI greater than .80, a NFI greater than .90, and a CFI greater than .90 are considered as indicating a good fit (Baumgartner and Homburg, 1996; Segars and Grover, 1993). Although AGFI values exceeding .90 are preferable, the more liberal cutoff of .80 has been used for a good model fit (Chau, 1997; Taylor and Todd, 1995). In addition, path coefficients (e.g., direct, indirect, and total causal effects) and predictive powers were examined for each model. Standardized path coefficients were used for path coefficients. The total causal effect of an independent construct on a dependent construct is the summation of its direct and indirect effects. Predictive power was examined by using R2 for each dependent construct.
The theory of reasoned action Path analysis to examine the theory of reasoned action resulted in a less-than-adequate model fit. The path analysis revealed a significant x25 (176.96, p < .0001). Although the GFI was .92, other model fit indices were not satisfactory (AGFI = .75, NFI = .87, and CFI = .87). The coefficients for determination were .39 for intention, .45 for attitude, and .29 for subjective norm. As shown in Figure 3, all paths in this model were positively significant. Table 4 presents indirect and total causal effects of each construct on intention to shop online (see Figure 3 for direct effects). Interestingly, the indirect effect (_ = .41, p < .01) of behavioral beliefs on intention was greater than the direct effect (_ = .07, p < .05) of subjective norm on intention. Attitude had the strongest total causal effect (_ = .61, p < .01) on intention to shop online. [Insert Figure 3 here] [Insert Table 4 here]
The theory of planned behavior Path analysis to examine the theory of planned behavior revealed an adequate model fit. Although the x212 value was significant (231.87, p < .0001), other model fit indices were satisfactory for a good model fit (GFI = .92, AGFI = .82, NFI = .90, and CFI = .91). The coefficients of determination were .43 for intention, .45 for attitude, .29 for subjective norm, and .30 for perceived behavioral control (see Figure 4). Compared with the TRA, the TPB – which adds the two additional constructs of control beliefs and perceived behavioral control – revealed a slight increase of explanatory power on intention (R2I = .43 and .39 for the TPB and the TRA, respectively) and better model fit indices. Thus, hypothesis 1 – the TPB has better explanatory power than the TRA in predicting the consumer's online-shopping intention – is supported. As summarized in Figure 4, all paths – except that between subjective norm and intention – were positively significant. Thus, hypotheses 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, and 3c are supported but hypothesis 2b is not. As Table 4 presents, while behavioral belief and control belief constructs (i.e., _biei and _cbippi) have significant indirect effects on intention to shop online, the normative belief construct (i.e., _nbimci) has a non-significant indirect effect on intention. [Insert Figure 4 here]
The technology acceptance model Path analysis to examine the technology acceptance model resulted in an adequate model fit. Again the x21 value was significant (45.63, p < .0001), and this time other model fit indices were also satisfactory for a good model fit (GFI = .97, AGFI = .91, NFI = .97, and CFI = .97). The coefficients for determination were .43 for intention, .47 for attitude, and .42 for usefulness (see Figure 5). Although the TAM showed somewhat-improved model fits, it revealed the same explanatory power on intention as did the TPB (R2I = .43 for both the TPB and TAM). Thus, hypothesis 4 – the TPB has better explanatory power than the TAM in predicting the consumer's online-shopping intention – is not supported. As summarized in Figure 5, all paths in the TAM model were positively significant. Therefore, hypotheses 5, 6, and 7 are supported. As shown in Table 4, both usefulness and ease of use had significant indirect effects on intention. With respect to direct, indirect, and total causal effects of usefulness and ease of use on attitude, this study found that although the direct effect of usefulness (_ = .52, p < .01) was greater than that of ease of use (_ = .22, p < .05), the total causal effect of usefulness (_ = .52, p < .01) was smaller than that of ease of use (_ = .56, p < .01). These findings suggest that usefulness takes an important mediating role between ease of use and attitude toward online shopping. [Insert Figure 5 here]
Discussion Model comparison Three models (i.e., the TRA, the TPB, and the TAM) were compared in terms of the power of each to predict and understand the consumer's online-shopping behavior based on model fit indices and explanatory powers in predicting intention to shop online. The fit statistics revealed that the TRA provided a somewhat-inadequate model fit to the data. This finding indicates that the TRA would be improved by including other variables. The TPB, which adds perceived behavioral control to the TRA, provided a better model fit and a moderately better explanatory power than did the TRA (R2I = .43 and .39 for the TPB and the TRA, respectively). These results are consistent with previous studies (Ajzen and Madden, 1986; Chang, 1998; Madden, Ellen, and Ajzen, 1992) and indicate that non-volitional factors such as the perception of ability to use the Internet for shopping and Webstore features (e.g., site accessibility, product description, and loading speed of Websites) significantly affect intention to shop online. Thus, it can be assumed that the inclusion of perceived behavioral control takes an important role in predicting and explaining the consumer's online-shopping intention and provides a more robust theoretical basis for the study of online shopping. The TAM that has been typically adopted in IS studies (e.g., Davis, 1989; Davis, et. al., 1989; Mathieson, 1991) was also successfully applied to the domain of online shopping behavior. The TAM revealed an adequate model fit to the data and the same amount of variance in explaining intention to shop online as did the TPB (R2I = .43 for both models). With respect to the variance in explaining attitude, the TAM was better than the TPB, but the difference was not severe (R2A = .47 and .45 for the TAM and the TPB, respectively). Previous studies comparing the two models had revealed inconsistent results. While Mathieson (1991) and Chau and Hu (2001) found that the TAM had more explanatory power in predicting behavioral intention than did the TPB, Taylor and Todd (1995) demonstrated that the TPB accounted for more variance than did the TAM. Results of the previous studies, however, were similar in that the R2I differences were not severe. These results make it difficult to determine which model is best to apply to practical situations. In addition, the two models have the trade-off between information provided by models and parsimony (Taylor and Todd, 1995). While the TPB provides more information, it is also more complex to use. The TAM is more parsimonious and provides directive information, but it explains only attitudinal components. Thus, this study concludes that the best model to use may depend on variables of interest. If the research focus is Internet technology usage in online shopping, the TAM would be preferable to the TPB. If a focus of research encompasses social and non-volitional factors in online shopping, the decomposed TPB would be better than the TAM.
Effects on intention to shop online This study found that, across the three models, attitude toward online shopping had the strongest effect on intention to shop online. Recently, several TAM studies (Gefen and Straub, 2000; Lederer et. al., 2000; Venkatesh and Davis, 1996; Venkatesh and Morris, 2000) have adopted a diminished TAM that excludes attitude. The reasoning for this was that attitude did not function as a strong mediator between its antecedents (i.e., usefulness and ease of use) and intention (Chau and Hu, 2001). In order to test the role of attitude in the online-shopping context, this study compared path coefficients and explanatory powers of the diminished TAM and the original TAM. Table 5 shows the results. Although the total causal effect of ease of use on intention increased in the diminished TAM, the explanatory power of intention and the total causal effect of usefulness on intention decreased in the diminished TAM (R2I = .37 and .43 for the diminished TAM and the TAM, respectively). It should be also noted that the indirect effect of ease of use on intention dramatically decreased in the diminished TAM, and the indirect effect of usefulness on intention was greater than the direct effect of usefulness on intention in the TAM. Thus, it seems reasonable to conclude that attitude takes an important mediating role between its antecedents and intention in the online-shopping context. [Insert Table 5 here] Interestingly, this study found that subjective norm was not a significant predictor of intention to shop online in the TPB. As Davis et. al. (1989, p.986) indicated that "subjective norm may influence behavioral intention indirectly via attitude," several TPB studies (Chang, 1998; Malhotra and Galletta, 1999) found significant direct effect of subjective norm on attitude, although no direct effect of subjective norm on intention was observed. This study also tested the causal link between subjective norm and attitude in the online-shopping context by subtracting the link between subjective norm and intention. The result revealed significant direct effects of subjective norm on attitude (_ = .16 for both the TRA and the TPB) and significant indirect effects of subjective norm on intention to shop online (_ = .10 for the TRA and _ = .08 for the TPB, p < .01). It should also be noted that the indirect effect of subjective norm on intention in the alternative TRA that links subjective norm with attitude instead of intention was greater than the direct effect of subjective norm on intention in the original TRA. Supporting Davis et. al.'s (1989) assumption, these findings indicate that subjective norm influences intention through attitude indirectly rather than directly in the online-shopping context. Thus, it can be assumed that consumers consider how important-others evaluate shopping online when the consumers form their own attitudes toward online shopping, and, their intention is, in turn, determined by attitude. Since using the Internet for shopping is fairly voluntary, personal, and individual, as compared to the use of technology in the workplace, consumers may rely actively on individual desire to shop through the Internet. The TPB revealed direct effects of perceived behavioral control on intention to shop online. As mentioned before, the addition of perceived behavioral control to the TRA revealed a better model fit and explained the increased variance in intention to shop online. These findings indicate that online shopping is not totally under the consumer's volitional control. In other words, resources and abilities to use the Internet for shopping are required to successfully shop online. As expected, attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control in the TPB were direct functions of their corresponding beliefs. In the TPB, normative beliefs did not have a significant indirect effect on intention, whereas behavioral beliefs and control beliefs had significant indirect effects on intention. In the TAM, usefulness had significant direct and indirect effects on intention to shop online. These findings imply that online shoppers have a utilitarian nature to improve their shopping productivity by saving money and time and easily comparing products. Ease of use also had a significant indirect effect on intention. Interestingly, the indirect effect of ease of use on intention was comparable to both the total causal effect of usefulness on intention and the direct effect of attitude on intention. This result indicates that ease of use takes an important role as an antecedent affecting the consumer's attitude formation and perception of usefulness. The significant roles of usefulness and ease of use in this study confirm that the TAM can be successfully applied to the domain of online shopping beyond IS usage.
Limitations and future research This study has a number of limitations, and these limitations would provide guidelines for future research to improve our understanding of online-shopping behavior. First, this study did not capture consumers' actual shopping behavior. Since the positive relationship between intention and actual behavior has been consistently demonstrated in the TRA, the TPB, and the TAM studies (e.g., Davis et. al., 1989; George, 2002; Moon and Kim, 2001; Limayem et. al., 2000; Taylor and Todd, 1995), it is expected that this limitation does not pose a serious problem in interpreting findings of this study and that further studies that measure actual behavior in the online-shopping context resolve the concern. The second limitation is subject to the convenience sample comprising panelists who registered with an online research company. Panelists may possess better Internet skills and have experienced more online shopping than the average user. This limit embodied in the sample makes it difficult to generalize the findings of this study. Thus, it is hoped that future research using different populations of consumers would test validations of the findings and expand our understanding of online-shopping behavior. The third limitation results from the method to elicit a distinctive and specific belief set for the TPB. As mentioned before, this study adapted beliefs validated in previous studies, instead of eliciting beliefs through interviews with potential respondents as Ajzen and Fishbein (1980) recommended. This might have led the TRA and the TPB to account for less than fifty percent of the variance in intention; however, many studies in journalism and mass communication also account for less variance than fifty percent. These results imply the need to continue exploration of other important variables that influence the consumer's intention to shop online. Thus, it is suggested that future research uses in-depth interviews with consumers as well as extensive study of related literature to expand the scope of antecedents hampering or increasing the consumer's online-shopping intention. Beyond these limitations, more research is required to continue to test how subjective norm affects intention in the online-shopping context. As explained earlier, this study found the indirect effect of subjective norm on intention through attitude instead of its direct effect on intention as proposed by the TPB. The relationship between subjective norm and attitude/intention may be different based on demographic characteristics, level of Internet skills, and product category. For example, when purchasing high-touchable products (e.g., clothing, flowers, jewelry, and furniture) through the Internet, risks of product satisfaction rise because the consumer cannot taste, smell, and touch the product when purchasing online. Therefore, it is expected that the consumer will consider important-referents' responses and will contemplate his/her ability to successfully shop online more carefully than when purchasing low-touchable products (e.g., books, music, and computers) through the Internet.
Appendix A: Tables
Table 1. TAM research in online shopping and World Wide Web Authors Constructs Applications Methodology Findings Gefen and Straub BI, Intended inquiry, Online shopping Experiential BI = U, Inquiry = U + EOU, (2000) U, & EOU, survey & U = EOU Koufaris (2002) BI, U, & EOU Online shopping E-mail survey BI = U Lederer et. al. (2000) Usage,U, & EOU WWW E-mail survey Usage = U + EOU Moon and Kim (2000) Usage, BI, A, U, EOU, WWW Survey Usage = BI, BI = A + U + P, & Playfulness (P) A = U + EOU + P, U = EOU, & P = EOU Morris and Dillon Usage, BI, A, U, Netscape Survey Usage = BI, BI = A + U, (1997) & EOU
& A = U + EOU
Table 2. Summary of scales Construct Source No. of items Scales Intention Limayem et. al. (2000) Three 7-point Likert Attitude Taylor and Todd (1995) Four 7-point semantic Subjective norm Mathieson (1991) Three 7-point Likert Behavioral control Taylor and Todd (1995) Three 7-point Likert Behavioral beliefs Usefulness Davis (1989) & Limayem et. al. (2000) Six 7-point Likert Ease of use Davis (1989) Four 7-point Likert Trust Jarvenpaa and Todd (1997) Three 7-point Likert Playfulness Koufaris (2002) & Webster et. al. (1993) Six 7-point Likert Normative beliefs Friend influence Limayem et. al. (2000) Two 7-point Likert Family influence Limayem et. al. (2000) Two 7-point Likert Media influence Limayem et. al. (2000) Two 7-point Likert Control beliefs Self-efficacy Hollenbeck and Brief (1987) Four 7-point Likert Technology Limayem et. al. (2000) Four 7-point Likert
Table 3. Demographic characteristics of respondents Variable Description Frequency Percent Gender Male 384 53% Female 343 47% Age 18-29 244 33% 30-39 148 20% 40-49 175 24% 50-64 121 17% Over 65 44 6% Race White 629 86% African-American 34 5% Hispanic 17 2% Asian 21 3% Other 28 4% Income Less than $20,000 41 6% $20,000 - $40,000 178 25% $40,000 - $60,000 173 24% $60,000 - $80,000 136 19% Over $80,000 183 26% Education Less than high school 9 1% High school graduate 68 9% Some college 229 31% College graduate 242 33% Some graduate school or higher 183 25% Marital status Single 334 46%
Married 395 54% Note: Missing values lead to the variance in respondent numbers of each demographic group.
Table 4. Effects on behavioral intention of the models
TRA TPB TAM Indirect effect åbiei .41** .33** - ånbimci .04** .02 - åcbippi - .17** - Usefulness - - .25** Ease of use - - .42** Total causal effect Attitude .61** .50** .48** Subjective norm .07* .03 - Perceived behavioral control - .30** - åbiei .41** .33** - ånbimci .04** .02 - åcbippi - .17** - Usefulness - - .48** Ease of use - - .42** * p < .05 and ** p < .01
Table 5. Path analysis results of the TAM and the diminished TAM^
The TAM The diminished TAM Direct effects Ease of use to usefulness .65** .65** Ease of use to attitude .22** - Ease of use to intention - .34** Usefulness to attitude .52** - Usefulness to intention .23* .33** Attitude to intention .48** - Indirect effects on intention Ease of use .42** .21** Usefulness .25** Total causal effects on intention Ease of use .42** .56** Usefulness .48** .33** ^ The diminished TAM excludes attitude in the original TAM model. * p < .05 and ** p < .01
Appendix B: Figures
Appendix C: Sample questionnaire items
Attitudinal constructs
Playfulness (Sample) b: I would/do find it enjoyable to use the Internet for shopping. e: How important is it to you to enjoy shopping?
b: I would/do find it exciting to use the Internet for shopping. e: How important is it to you to be excited about shopping?
Usefulness (Sample) b: Online shopping would/does enable me to save time. e: How important is it to you to save time when shopping?
b: Online shopping would/does allow me to save money. e: How important is it to you to save money when shopping?
Ease of use (Sample) b: The process of interacting with the Internet for shopping would be/is clear and understandable. e: How important is it to you that your shopping process is clear and understandable?
b: Learning to use the Internet for shopping would be/is easy for me. e: How important is it to you that the system you use to shop is easy to learn?
Trust (Sample) b: Products purchased on the Internet would/do meet my expectations. e: How important is it to you to purchase products that meet your expectations?
Normative constructs (Sample)
nb: My friends would/do (oppose/support) my shopping online. mc: Generally speaking, I don't want to do what my friends oppose.
nb: My family would/does (disapprove/approve) of my shopping online. mc: Generally speaking, I want to do what my family approves.
nb: Media frequently encourage people to shop online. mc: Generally speaking, I want to do what media encourage people to do.
Control constructs
Self-efficacy (Sample) cb: I would be/am confident in my abilities to use the Internet for shopping. pp: For me, being confident in my abilities to use a system for shopping is (Extremely unimportant/Extremely important).
cb: It would be/is possible for me to shop online at the level I would like. pp: For me, the possibility of shopping at the level I would like is (Extremely unimportant/Extremely important).
Facilitating conditions (Sample) cb: Online stores would be/are easily accessible (e.g., through search engines, cyber malls, and Web ads). pp: For me, easy accessibility of online stores (e.g., through search engines, cyber malls, and Web ads) would be/is (Extremely unimportant/Extremely important).
cb: Products of online stores would be/are well described. pp: For me, descriptions of products online would be/is (Extremely unimportant/Extremely important).
Attitude
Using the Internet for shopping would be/is a (bad/good, foolish/wise, and unpleasant/pleasant) idea. I (dislike/like) the idea of using the Internet for shopping
Subjective norm
People who are important to me would/do (oppose /support) my shopping online. People who are important to me would/do (disapprove/approve) of my shopping online. Media that promote opinions I value encourage people to shop online.
Perceived behavioral control
I am able to use the Internet to shop online. Online shopping is entirely within my control. I have the resources, the knowledge and the ability to use the Internet for shopping.
Behavioral Intention
I intend to shop online in next six months. It is likely that I will shop online in next six months. I expect to shop online in next six months. References
Abdul-Gader, A. H. & Kozar, K. A. (1995). The impact of computer alienation on information technology investment decisions: An exploratory cross-national analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 535-559.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.
(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
, & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
, & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161.
Chang, M. K. (1998). Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(16), 1825-1834.
Chau, P. Y. K. (1997). Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 309-334.
, Au, G., & Tam, K. Y. (2000). Impact of information presentation modes on online shopping: An empirical evaluation of a broadband interactive shopping service. Journal of organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 1-22.
, & Hu, P. J. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 699-719.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
, Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
Donthu, N., & Garcia, A. (1999). The Internet shopper. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(3), 52-58.
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fram, E., & Grady, D. (1995). Internet buyers: Will the surfers become buyers? Direct Marketing, 57(10), 63-65.
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1), 1-28.
George, F. F. (2002). Influences on the intent to make Internet purchases. Internet Research, 12(2), 165-180.
Goldsmith, R. E. (2000). How innovativeness differentiates online buyers. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(4), 323-333.
Greenspan, R. (April 17, 2002). Two-third hit the net. Insert online address [Online]. Available: http://cyberatlas.internet.com/big_picture/geographics/article /0,,5911_1011491,00.html.
Harrison, D. A., Mykytyn, Jr., P. P., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (1997). Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: Theory and empirical tests. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 171-195.
Heijden, H., & Verhagen, T. (2002). Measuring and assessing online store image: A study of two online bookshops in the Benelux. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Hoffman, D., & Novak, T. (1997). A new marketing paradigm for electronic commerce. The Information Society, 13(1), 43-54.
Jarvenpaa, S., & Todd, P. (1997). Is there a future for retailing on the Internet? In Peterson, R. A. (Eds.), Electronic marketing and the consumer (pp. 139-154). Thousands Oak, CA; Sage Publications.
, & Tractinsky, N. (1999). Consumer trust in an Internet store: A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication [Online], 5(2). Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue2/jarvenpaa.htm.
Jupiterdirect (2002). ECommerce B2C: US consumer shopping, buying, and demographics [Online]. Available: http://jupiterdirect.com/item/0,,2317769_1,00.html.
Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205-223.
Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29(3), 269-282.
Limayem, M., Khalifa, M., & Frini, A. (2000). What makes consumers buy from Internet? A longitudinal study of online shopping. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 30 (4), 421-432.
Madden, T., Ellen, P. S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18 (1), 3-9.
Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391-410.
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38, 217-230.
Peterson, R. A., Balasubramanian, S., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (1997). Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 329-346.
Phau, I., & Poon, S. M. (2000). Factors influencing the types of products and services purchased over the Internet. Internet Research, 10(2), 102-113.
Riemenschneider, C. K. (1997). Understanding IT adoption/acquisition in small business: A comparison of three models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Arlington.
Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 517-525.
Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325-343.
Shim, S., & Drake, M. (1990). Consumer intention to utilize electronic shopping. Journal of Direct Marketing, 4(3), 22-33.
Stewart, D. W., Pavlou, P., & Ward, S. (2002). Media influences on marketing communications. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 353-396). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Swaminathan, V., Lepkowska-White, E., & Rao, B. P. (1999). Browsers or buyers in cyberspace? An investigation of factors influencing electronic exchange. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication [Online], 5(2). Available: http://www.ascusc.org/ jcmc/vol5/issue2/swaminathan.htm.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144-176.
Teo, T., Lim, V., & Lai, R. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. OMEGA: The International Journal of Management Science, 27, 25-37.
Triandis, H. C. (1979). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. In Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1979: Beliefs, attitudes, and values (pp. 195-259). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
U.S. Census Bureau (2002). United States Department of Commerce News [Online]. Available: http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/current.html.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
, & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.
Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 411-426.
Yoh, E. (1999). Consumer adoption of the Internet for apparel shopping. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.
|